Zoning of Cultivated Land Quality Improvement Based on Cultivated Land Quality Grade and Limiting Factors: A Case Study of Qingyang County in Anhui Province

XIE Xinyun; JIANG Yuanyuan; ZHAO Wen; WANG Cuiting; MA Youhua; MA Ming

doi:10.12371/j.ynau(s).202210052

Volume 17 Issue 2

Apr. 2023

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Social Science) > 2023 > 17(2): 149-156. > DOI: 10.12371/j.ynau(s).202210052

XIE Xinyun, JIANG Yuanyuan, ZHAO Wen, WANG Cuiting, MA Youhua, MA Ming. Zoning of Cultivated Land Quality Improvement Based on Cultivated Land Quality Grade and Limiting Factors: A Case Study of Qingyang County in Anhui Province[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Social Science), 2023, 17(2): 149-156. DOI: 10.12371/j.ynau(s).202210052

Citation:

PDF (1887 KB)

Zoning of Cultivated Land Quality Improvement Based on Cultivated Land Quality Grade and Limiting Factors: A Case Study of Qingyang County in Anhui Province

DOI: 10.12371/j.ynau(s).202210052

1.
College of Architecture and Planning, Anhui Jianzhu University, Hefei 230601, China
2.
Qingyang County Soil and Fertilizer General Station of Anhui, Qingyang 247100, China
3.
College of Resources and Environment, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, China

More Information

Received Date: October 23, 2022
Revised Date: November 13, 2022
Accepted Date: November 13, 2022
Available Online: November 20, 2022
Published Date: April 14, 2023

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Understanding the status quo of cultivated land quality is the basis for improving the quality of cultivated land, and defining the limiting factor is the key to improving cultivated land. Using spatial autocorrelation analysis and obstacle degree model to reveal the status quo and spatial distribution characteristics of cultivated land quality in Qingyang County, identify the types of land block constraints and determine the difficulty of improvement, and on this basis, divide cultivated land quality grade improvement zones. The results show that: The quality grade of cultivated land in the study area was mainly in grades 4 ~ 6, showing the spatial distribution characteristics of high in the north and low in the south, and showing strong spatial correlation. The distribution area of cultivated land limited by terrain location and irrigation capacity is the largest, and the difficulty of improving the limiting factor is generally higher in the south and lower in the north. Based on the results of cultivated land quality evaluation and restriction factor diagnosis, the cultivated land in Qingyang County was divided into key promotion areas, comprehensive promotion areas, general promotion areas, protected promotion areas and restricted promotion areas, and the relevant strategies were proposed according to the characteristics of these areas. The research results can provide a basis for the focus and direction of the cultivated land quality improvement project.
- cultivated land quality,
- limiting factor,
- quality improvement,
- zoning

FullText(HTML)

References (25)

References

[1]	张杰, 赵瑞东, 田超, 等. 基于限制程度排序的卢龙县耕地质量提升重点区域划定研究[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2017, 25(3): 429. DOI: 10.13930/j.cnki.cjea.160747.
[2]	孙晓兵, 孔祥斌, 温良友. 基于耕地要素的耕地质量评价指标体系研究及其发展趋势[J]. 土壤通报, 2019, 50(3): 739. DOI: 10.19336/j.cnki.trtb.2019.03.33.
[3]	陈正发, 龚爱民, 张刘东, 等. 基于质量评价的省域尺度坡耕地质量调控体系构建[J]. 农业工程学报, 2021, 37(20): 136. DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2021.20.015.
[4]	李志芳, 王锐, 沈新磊. 基于质量指数和空间自相关分析的耕地保护分区研究[J]. 土壤通报, 2021, 52(4): 785. DOI: 10.19336/j.cnki.trtb.2020090201.
[5]	熊昌盛, 栾乔林, 韦仕川. 基于空间自相关的耕地质量分布格局[J]. 地域研究与开发, 2016, 35(5): 128. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-2363.2016.05.023.
[6]	李子杰, 高沪宁, 丁琪洵, 等. 基于Moran’ s I的安徽省太湖县耕地质量时空格局分析[J]. 水土保持通报, 2021, 41(3): 350. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.03.045.
[7]	赵海乐, 徐艳, 张国梁, 等. 基于限制因子改良与耕地质量潜力耦合的耕地整治分区[J]. 农业工程学报, 2020, 36(21): 272. DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2020.21.033.
[8]	董婷, 杨朝现, 钟守琴, 等. 山地丘陵区耕地质量可提升潜力空间分布及保护分区: 以重庆市江津区为例[J/OL]. 农业资源与环境学报:1−15.[2022 − 11 − 11]. DOI: 10.13254/j.jare.2021.0679.
[9]	郭力娜, 张凤荣, 曲衍波, 等. 基于分等因素组合的农用地整理类型分区[J]. 农业工程学报, 2010, 26(9): 308. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-6819.2010.09.051.
[10]	王珂, 李玲, 黎鹏. 基于生态安全和粮食安全的高标准农田建设研究[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2021, 37(6): 706. DOI: 10.19741/j.issn.1673-4831.2020.0781.
[11]	曾吉彬, 邵景安, 谢德体. 基于遥感影像的重庆高标准基本农田建设难度与时序分析[J]. 农业工程学报, 2018, 34(23): 267. DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2018.23.035.
[12]	陈正发, 史东梅, 何伟, 等. 基于“要素−需求−调控”的云南坡耕地质量评价[J]. 农业工程学报, 2020, 36(12): 236. DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2020.12.029.
[13]	肖碧林, 陈印军, 卢布, 等. 当前我国耕地质量评价类型与问题分析[J]. 资源与产业, 2008(4): 58. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-2464.2008.04.013.
[14]	邵雅静, 员学锋. 基于限制因子分析的耕地质量提升潜力分区[J]. 生态学杂志, 2019, 38(8): 2442. DOI: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.201908.026.
[15]	宋戈, 刘燕妮, 张文琦, 等. 基于可改良限制因子的耕地质量等别提升潜力研究[J]. 农业工程学报, 2019, 35(14): 261.
[16]	孙妍芳, 裴久渤, 张立江, 等. 辽宁棕壤耕地质量评价及障碍因素类型分区研究[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2017, 38(11): 130.
[17]	王考, 姚云峰, 包玉海, 等. 内蒙古农牧交错带县域耕地健康评价及障碍因素分区研究[J]. 东北师大学报(自然科学版), 2020, 52(1): 153. DOI: 10.16163/j.cnki.22-1123/n.2020.01.027.
[18]	张立江, 汪景宽, 裴久渤, 等. 东北典型黑土区耕地地力评价与障碍因素诊断[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2017, 38(1): 110. DOI: 10.7621/cjarrp.1005-9121.20170117.
[19]	李保国. 土壤变化及其过程的定量化[J]. 土壤学进展, 1995, 23(2): 33.
[20]	孙晓兵, 孔祥斌, 张青璞, 等. 基于指标综合特征的耕地遗传质量和动态质量评价[J]. 农业工程学报, 2020, 36(22): 254. DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2020.22.029.
[21]	TOBLER W R. A computer movie simulating urban growth in the Detroit region[J]. Economic geography, 1970, 46(2): 234. DOI: 10.2307/143141.
[22]	杨开忠, 冯等田, 沈体雁. 空间计量经济学研究的最新进展[J]. 开发研究. 2009(2): 7. DOI: 10.13483/j.cnki.kfyj.2009.02.004.
[23]	刘洋, 余建新, 向冬蕾, 等. 基于局部空间自相关的思茅区耕地利用保护综合分区[J]. 水土保持研究, 2020, 27(1): 183. DOI: 10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2020.01.026.
[24]	胡辉, 谢梅生, 蔡斌, 等. GIS技术在县级土地利用总体规划修编基本农田划定中的应用: 以江西省安义县为例[J]. 中国土地科学, 2009, 23(12): 28. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8158.2009.12.005.
[25]	杨建宇, 徐凡, 赵龙, 等. 基于综合质量空间自相关性分析的耕地保护分区方法[J]. 农业机械学报, 2017, 48(3): 156. DOI: 10.6041/j.issn.1000-1298.2017.03.020.

[1]	ZHANG Ping, ZHU Jianjun. Study on the Influence of Digital Literacy on the Adoption Behavior of Cultivated Land Quality Protection Technology in Food and Agriculture[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Social Science), 2025, 19(1): 21-28. DOI: 10.12371/j.ynau(s).202409175
[2]	ZHOU Tao, LI Yongqian, CHENG Zhenbo, YU Jiaxiang. Evaluation and Differences of the Economic Efficiency of Fishery in the Yangtze River Economic Zone[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Social Science), 2024, 18(2): 8-15. DOI: 10.12371/j.ynau(s).202311033
[3]	ZHANG Yanjun. Cultivated Land Safety Evaluation and Obstacle Factor Diagnosis Based on DPSIR-TOPSIS Model[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Social Science), 2022, 16(4): 117-125. DOI: 10.12371/j.ynau(s).202203028
[4]	LI Peng, FAN Shuping, ZHANG Feifei, WANG Dong, XIAO Zegan. Research on Suitability Evaluation and Zoning Control of Rural Residential Land Based on Village Scale[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Social Science), 2022, 16(1): 123-132. DOI: 10.12371/j.ynau(s).202103086
[5]	LIAO Xiaoshu, LI Yanqiong, WANG Tao, JIANG Yudong, QU Zihao. Research on the Obstacles and Countermeasures of the Improvement of the Overall Quality of Farmers Cooperatives: Taking Anzhou District of Mianyang City in Sichuan as an Example[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Social Science), 2021, 15(5): 7-12. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-390X(s).202011067
[6]	KUANG Aiping, HU Chao. Comprehensive Evaluation of the Development Quality of Low Carbon Agriculture in Guangxi by Factor Analysis and Entropy Method[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Social Science), 2021, 15(3): 61-69. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-390X(s).202006098
[7]	ZHANG Yixin, TIAN Jing. Study on the Problems and Countermeasures of Human Resource Allocation in Yunnan Cross Border Economic Cooperation Zone[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Social Science), 2021, 15(2): 39-44. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-390X(s).202006050
[8]	YANG Qin, WEI Tong, BI Dong. The Construction of Qujing Public Cultural Service Demonstration Zone[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Social Science), 2020, 14(2): 17-23. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-390X(s).201908038
[9]	XIE Leilei, ZHANG Guo. The Livelihood Capital Mechanism and Survival Quality Ascension Path of The Reservoir Migrants[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Social Science), 2019, 13(1): 48-56,94. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-390X(s).2019.01.009
[10]	ZHANG Guobao, WANG Weizhong, ZHANG Dehua. Identification of the Critical Factors for Farmers' Risk Cognition Ability to Quality and Safety[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Social Science), 2016, 10(6): 40-48. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-390X(s).2016.06.009

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(2)

1.	汤雷鸣，应纯洋，洪开燕，武升，吴炳青，王强. 2022年来安县耕地质量等级特征研究. 现代农业科技. 2024(06): 98-101+112 .
2.	柴莎莎，任艳敏，姚兰，卢闯，陈文焘. 基于CRITIC-TOPSIS模型的耕地质量评价与提升分区研究. 江苏农业科学. 2024(10): 254-260 .

Other cited types(2)

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article views (1643) PDF downloads (13) Cited by(4)

Zoning of Cultivated Land Quality Improvement Based on Cultivated Land Quality Grade and Limiting Factors: A Case Study of Qingyang County in Anhui Province

DOI: 10.12371/j.ynau(s).202210052

Abstract

References

Related Articles

Cited by

Periodical cited type(2)

Other cited types(2)

Catalog

Zoning of Cultivated Land Quality Improvement Based on Cultivated Land Quality Grade and Limiting Factors: A Case Study of Qingyang County in Anhui Province

DOI: 10.12371/j.ynau(s).202210052

Abstract

References

Related Articles

Cited by

Periodical cited type(2)

Other cited types(2)

Catalog

Export File

Citation

Format

Content