• Core Journal of Chinese Humanities and Social Sciences of AMI
  • National Excellent Social Science Journal of Agricultural Universities
  • The most popular journal of Comprehensive Humanities and Social Sciences
ZHANG Yanjun. Cultivated Land Safety Evaluation and Obstacle Factor Diagnosis Based on DPSIR-TOPSIS Model[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Social Science), 2022, 16(4): 117-125. DOI: 10.12371/j.ynau(s).202203028
Citation: ZHANG Yanjun. Cultivated Land Safety Evaluation and Obstacle Factor Diagnosis Based on DPSIR-TOPSIS Model[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Social Science), 2022, 16(4): 117-125. DOI: 10.12371/j.ynau(s).202203028

Cultivated Land Safety Evaluation and Obstacle Factor Diagnosis Based on DPSIR-TOPSIS Model

DOI: 10.12371/j.ynau(s).202203028
More Information
  • Received Date: February 22, 2021
  • Revised Date: April 18, 2022
  • Accepted Date: April 20, 2022
  • Available Online: May 02, 2022
  • Published Date: May 18, 2022
  • Doing a good job of cultivated land security evaluation and the diagnosis of obstacles affecting cultivated land security can effectively improve the current situation of cultivated land security and provide a basis for the sustainable development of cultivated land security. Based on the standardized processing of cultivated land data in Shandong Province from 2000 to 2020, entropy method and analytic hierarchy process are selected to determine the index weight. Based on DPSIR model, taking the cultivated land data of the past 20 years as the original data, the improved TOPSIS Model and obstacle model are applied to scientifically analyze the current situation of cultivated land security in Shandong Province and diagnose its obstacle factors. The research shows that: (1) In the past 20 years, the cultivated land security in Shandong Province has generally shown a stable and positive trend, but the evaluation index has been lower than 0.6; (2) From the perspective of dimensions, the driving force layer and influence layer show an upward trend, the pressure layer shows a downward trend, the changes of state layer and response layer are tortuous; (3) The pressure layer, state layer and influence layer have great influence on cultivated land security in Shandong Province, while the driving force layer and response layer have little influence; (4) The per capita agricultural output benefit, per capita GDP, the proportion of primary production, the proportion of agricultural employed population and the use of agricultural film are the main obstacle factors affecting the safety of cultivated land. Cultivated land protection policy, socio-economic development and scientific and technological progress will promote the change of cultivated land security obstacle factors.
  • [1]
    GAO L, BRYAN B A. Finding pathways to national-scale land-sector sustainability[J]. Nature, 2017, 544(7649): 217. DOI: 10.1038/nature21694.
    [2]
    王国刚, 刘彦随, 陈秧分. 中国省域耕地集约利用态势与驱动力分析[J]. 地理学报, 2014, 69(7): 907. DOI: 10.11821/dlxb201407003.
    [3]
    XIE H L, HUANG Y Q, CHEN Q R, et al. Prospects for agricultural sustainable intensification: A review of research[J]. Land, 2019, 8(11): 157. DOI: 10.3390/land8110157.
    [4]
    单娜娜, 赖波. 基于集对分析的中国耕地资源安全的时间演变特征研究[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2011, 21(S1): 401.
    [5]
    刘庆, 陈利根. 长株潭地区土地可持续利用综合评价及空间分区[J]. 农业工程学报, 2013, 29(6): 245. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-6819.2013.06.030.
    [6]
    曲衍波, 朱伟亚, 郧文聚, 等. 基于压力—状态—响应模型的土地整治空间格局及障碍诊断[J]. 农业工程学报, 2017, 33(3): 241. DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2017.03.033.
    [7]
    BATEMAN I, AGARWALA M, BINNER A, et al. Spatially explicit integrated modeling and economic valuation of climate driven land use change and its indirect effects[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2016(181): 172. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.06.020.
    [8]
    谢花林, 邹金浪, 彭小琳. 基于能值的鄱阳湖生态经济区耕地利用集约度时空差异分析[J]. 地理学报, 2012, 67(7): 889. DOI: 10.11821/xb201207003.
    [9]
    陈会广, 崔娟, 陈江龙. 常州市耕地数量变化驱动力机制及政策绩效分析[J]. 资源科学, 2009, 31(5): 807. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1007-7588.2009.05.013.
    [10]
    郑华伟, 张锐, 孟展, 等. 基于PSR模型与集对分析的耕地生态安全诊断[J]. 中国土地科学, 2015, 29(12): 42. DOI: 10.11994/zgtdkx.2015.12.006.
    [11]
    吕晓, 牛善栋, 李振波, 等. 中国耕地集约利用研究现状及趋势分析[J]. 农业工程学报, 2015, 31(18): 212. DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2015.18.030.
    [12]
    刘芳, 张红旗. 我国农产品主产区土地可持续利用评价[J]. 自然资源学报, 2012, 27(7): 1138. DOI: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2012.07.006.
    [13]
    匡丽花, 叶英聪, 赵小敏, 等. 基于改进TOPSIS方法的耕地系统安全评价及障碍因子诊断[J]. 自然资源学报, 2018, 33(9): 1627. DOI: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20170754.
    [14]
    谭术魁, 张路, 齐睿. 基于系统动力学的区域耕地压力指数研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 2012, 27(5): 757. DOI: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2012.05.005.
    [15]
    ROSELL STAFFAN, OLVMO MATS, HOLMER BJORN, et al. Cultivated land: a scarce commodity in a densely populated rural area in South Wollo, Ethiopia[J]. Journal of Land Use Science, 2017(12): 252.
    [16]
    范胜龙, 杨玉珍, 陈训争, 等. 基于PSR和无偏GM(1, 1)模型的福建省耕地生态安全评价与预测[J]. 中国土地科学, 2016, 30(9): 19. DOI: 10.11994/zgtdkx.20161027.11013.
    [17]
    何艳宾. 山东省耕地生态安全评价及障碍因子诊断[D]. 济南: 山东农业大学, 2017.
    [18]
    DELGADO L E, ZÚ IGA C C, ASÚN R A, et al. Toward social-ecological coastal zone governance of Chiloé Island (Chile) based on the DPSIR framework. Science of the Total Environment, 2021(758): 143999. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143999.
    [19]
    HAN H, LI H M, ZHANG K Z. Urban water ecosystem health evaluation based on the improved fuzzy matter-element extension assessment model: case study from Zhengzhou city, China[J]. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2020(2): 7502342. DOI: 10.1155/2019/7502342.
    [20]
    BU J H, LI C H, WANG X, et al. Assessment and prediction of the water ecological carrying capacity in Changzhou city, China[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020(277): 123988. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123988.
    [21]
    曲衍波, 张彦军, 朱伟亚, 等. “三生”功能视角下全域土地综合整治格局与模式研究[J]. 现代城市研究, 2021(3): 33. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6000.2021.03.005.
    [22]
    左丽君, 张増祥, 董婷婷, 等. 耕地复种指数研究的国内外进展[J]. 自然资源学报, 2009, 24(3): 553. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-3037.2009.03.021.
    [23]
    葛艳艳, 王伟, 樊骋. 基于DPSIR-TOPSIS模型的安徽省耕地生态安全评价及其障碍因子研究[J]. 山东农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2021, 23(2): 80. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-8091.2021.02.012.
    [24]
    曲衍波, 张勇, 李慧燕, 等. 基于“五量”协同模型的山东省建设用地集约利用评价及障碍调控[J]. 资源科学, 2017, 39(6): 1013. DOI: 10.18402/resci.2017.06.03.
    [25]
    韩磊, 潘玉君, 高庆彦, 等. 基于PSR和无偏GM(1, 1)模型的云南省耕地生态安全评价与预测[J]. 生态经济, 2019, 35(2): 148.
  • Related Articles

    [1]YANG Chengda, QI Jianling, JIN Jing, YANG Tianhang. Analysis of the Spatiotemporal Evolution and Obstacle Factors of the Synergistic Development of Rural Revitalization and New Quality Productivity[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Social Science), 2025, 19(2): 9-19. DOI: 10.12371/j.ynau(s).202408145
    [2]CHEN Kaiyue, LI Qingrui, LI Qinjiayuan, LI Guochun. Research Progress on the Coordinated Coupling of Agricultural Economic Development and Ecological Environmental Protection[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Social Science), 2025, 19(1): 86-90. DOI: 10.12371/j.ynau(s).202410076
    [3]CAO Junyong, ZHANG Lezhu, HE Jiancheng, CHEN Le. New Productive Forces and Urban-rural Balanced Development: Coupling Coordination, Regional Differences and Dynamic Evolution[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Social Science), 2025, 19(1): 1-11. DOI: 10.12371/j.ynau(s).202408013
    [4]ZHANG Bin, ZENG Wenqing, SHAN Lan. The Coupling Coordination and Spatial Differentiation of Rural Population-Economy-Society in Gansu Province under Background of Rural Revitalization[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Social Science), 2022, 16(4): 1-8. DOI: 10.12371/j.ynau(s).202202001
    [5]ZHU Peiwei, JIN Niang, SHEN Yang. New Urbanization and Water Ecological Civilization: Interaction Mechanism and Coupling Coordination[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Social Science), 2021, 15(5): 130-137. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-390X(s).202011029
    [6]LI Jie, XIE Xinyang, SHEN Yueqin, FEI Ximin. An Empirical Study on the Integration Effect of Regional Agriculture and Tourism: Based on the Perspective of Coordinated Development of Economy, Society and Ecology[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Social Science), 2021, 15(4): 76-83. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-390X(s).202008072
    [7]ZHANG Tao, YU Zhongxiang, GE Yanyan, REN Feier, WU Zhenxiang, ZHANG Yongbo, CAO Yijun. Evaluation of the Relationship between Urbanization Development and Land Ecological Security in Anhui Province Based on the Coupling Coordination Model[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Social Science), 2021, 15(3): 96-103. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-390X(s).202007082
    [8]LUO Fang, WU Xuan. Evaluation on the Coupling and Coordination Relationship between Tourism and Cultural Industry in Yunnan[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Social Science), 2019, 13(4): 121-126. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-390X(s).2019.04.020
    [9]HE Ruhai, WANG Qishuai. Evaluation of Coupling Relationship and Coordination Degree between Rural Land Input and Farmers' Income:A Case Study of Dabie Moutain Area in Anhui Province[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Social Science), 2019, 13(2): 93-98. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-390X(s).2019.02.014
    [10]ZHANG Hongjun, LIU Yufan. The Countermeasures for the Coordinated Development of Three Industries in Anhui Province[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Social Science), 2018, 12(5): 70-75. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-390X(s).2018.05.012

Catalog

    Article views (2117) PDF downloads (53) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return