• Core Journal of Chinese Humanities and Social Sciences of AMI
  • National Excellent Social Science Journal of Agricultural Universities
  • The most popular journal of Comprehensive Humanities and Social Sciences
LI Zhifeng, KONG Xing, QIAO Wenjing. Research on Influencing Factors of Farmers’ Inter-temporal Agricultural Technology Adoption Behavior: An Example of Straw Returning Technology[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Social Science), 2025, 19(1): 132-139. DOI: 10.12371/j.ynau(s).202409074
Citation: LI Zhifeng, KONG Xing, QIAO Wenjing. Research on Influencing Factors of Farmers’ Inter-temporal Agricultural Technology Adoption Behavior: An Example of Straw Returning Technology[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Social Science), 2025, 19(1): 132-139. DOI: 10.12371/j.ynau(s).202409074

Research on Influencing Factors of Farmers’ Inter-temporal Agricultural Technology Adoption Behavior: An Example of Straw Returning Technology

DOI: 10.12371/j.ynau(s).202409074
More Information
  • Received Date: September 19, 2024
  • Revised Date: October 08, 2024
  • Accepted Date: October 08, 2024
  • Available Online: October 09, 2024
  • Straw returning technology with intertemporal attributes is an important measure to promote the green development of agriculture areas in China. The internal factors, connecting factors and external factors that affect the adoption behavior of farmers’ straw returning technology were incorporated into the same analysis framework. Based on the survey data of 245 farmers in the central and eastern part of Gansu Province, the logistic model was used to determine the factors affecting the adoption behavior of straw returning technology. The main influencing factors, and then the ISM model was used to deeply analyze the logical relationship and hierarchical structure of each influencing factor. The research showed that: (1) There were 18 variables in the analysis framework of farmers’ straw returning technology adoption behavior influencing factors that had a significant impact on farmers’ adoption behavior; (2) The age of the head of the household, education level, whether it was located in the demonstration area, and whether to participate in technical training were important factors. The underlying root factors; the ability to obtain information, whether to join the cooperative, the scale of operation, the government’ s straw burning ban and subsidy policies were the indirect factors at the middle level; the level of farmers’ technical cognition, the level of part-time jobs, the per capita annual income of the family and the duration of land rights were the direct factors at the surface. Based on this, countermeasures and suggestions were put forward in terms of actively cultivating new professional farmers, improving agricultural technology extension system, stabilizing land management rights, expanding farmers’ information collection channels, and vigorously developing “three products and one standard” agricultural products.

  • [1]
    姜维军, 颜廷武, 张俊飚. 互联网使用能否促进农户主动采纳秸秆还田技术: 基于内生转换Probit 模型的实证分析[J]. 农业技术经济, 2021(3): 50. DOI: 10.13246/j.cnki.jae.2021.03.004.
    [2]
    任保平, 文丰安. 新时代中国高质量发展的判断标准、决定因素与实现途径[J]. 改革, 2018(4): 5.
    [3]
    颜廷武, 张童朝, 何可, 等. 作物秸秆还田利用的农民决策行为研究: 基于皖鲁等七省的调查[J]. 农业经济问题, 2017, 38(4): 39. DOI: 10.13246/j.cnki.iae.2017.04.005.
    [4]
    郑军, 史建民. 我国农作物秸秆资源化利用的特征和困境及出路: 以山东为例[J]. 农业现代化研究, 2012, 33(3): 354. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0275.2012.03.022.
    [5]
    姚科艳, 陈利根, 刘珍珍. 农户禀赋、政策因素及作物类型对秸秆还田技术采纳决策的影响[J]. 农业技术经济, 2018(12): 64. DOI: 10.13246/j.cnki.jae.2018.12.006.
    [6]
    盖豪, 颜廷武, 张俊飚. 感知价值、政府规制与农户秸秆机械化持续还田行为: 基于冀、皖、鄂三省1288份农户调查数据的实证分析[J]. 中国农村经济, 2020(8): 106.
    [7]
    郅建功, 颜廷武. 技术感知、风险规避与农户秸秆还田技术采纳行为: 基于对鄂皖冀3省1490个农户的调查[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2021, 35(11): 74. DOI: 10.13448/j.cnki.jalre.2021.300.
    [8]
    GEBREMEDHIN B, SWINTON S M. Investment in soil conservation in Northern Ethiopia: The role of land tenure security and public programs[J]. Agricultural Economics, 2003(29): 69.
    [9]
    徐志刚, 张骏逸, 吕开宇. 经营规模、地权期限与跨期农业技术采用: 以秸秆直接还田为例[J]. 中国农村经济, 2018(3): 61.
    [10]
    王振华, 李萌萌, 王苍林. 契约稳定性对农户跨期技术选择的影响: 基于2271个地块数据的分析[J]. 资源科学, 2020, 42(11): 2237. DOI: 10.18402/resci.2020.11.15.
    [11]
    张童朝, 颜廷武, 仇童伟. 年龄对农民跨期绿色农业技术采纳的影响[J]. 资源科学, 2020, 42(6): 1123. DOI: 10.18402/resci.2020.06.10.
    [12]
    郭利京, 赵瑾. 农户亲环境行为的影响机制及政策干预: 以秸秆处理行为为例[J]. 农业经济问题, 2014, 35(12): 78. DOI: 10.13246/j.cnki.iae.2014.12.010.
    [13]
    王晓敏, 颜廷武. 技术认知、环境规制与农户秸秆还田技术采纳行为[J]. 世界农业, 2022(4): 57. DOI: 10.13856/j.cn11-1097/s.2022.04.006.
    [14]
    张星, 颜廷武. 劳动力转移背景下农业技术服务对农户秸秆还田行为的影响分析: 以湖北省为例[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2021, 26(1): 196. DOI: 10.11841/i.issn.1007-4333.2021.01.20.
    [15]
    王洋, 王泮蘅. 基于计划行为理论的农户秸秆还田采纳意愿研究[J]. 河南农业大学学报, 2022, 56(1): 133. DOI: 10.16445/j.cnki.1000-2340.20210519.001.
    [16]
    郑旭媛, 王芳, 应瑞瑶. 农户禀赋约束、技术属性与农业技术选择偏向: 基于不完全要素市场条件下的农户技术采用分析框架[J]. 中国农村经济, 2018(3): 105.
    [17]
    JUST R E, D ZILBERMAN. The Effects of Agricultural Development Policies on Income Distribution and Technological Changein Agriculture[J]. Journal of Development Economics, 2006, 28(2): 193.
    [18]
    林毅夫. 再论制度、技术和中国农业发展[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2000.
    [19]
    胡乃娟, 孙晓玲, 许雅婷, 等. 基于Logistic-ISM模型的农户有机肥施用行为影响因素及层次结构分解[J]. 资源科学, 2019, 41(6): 1120. DOI: 10.18402/resci.2019.06.11.
  • Related Articles

    [1]HUANG Chaoqun, LIANG Bo, ZHAO Qi, LUO Tianxiao, TAN Jun. Analysis of Influencing Factors on the Willingness of Forest Farmers to Participate in the Protection and Construction of Ecological Public Welfare Forests: Based on the Survey Data of Guangxi[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Social Science), 2024, 18(6): 128-133. DOI: 10.12371/j.ynau(s).202407027
    [2]LI Jing, GUI Yating, ZHU Wenhao. Study on the Impacts of Social Capital on Consumers’ Willingness and Behavior to Purchase Fresh Agricultural Products with Group in Community[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Social Science), 2024, 18(5): 34-40. DOI: 10.12371/j.ynau(s).202404148
    [3]ZHOU Wei, WANG Ruiyan, LU Guiping. The Impact of Farmers’ Awareness of Environmental Health Risks on the Willingness to Adopt Environmental ProtectionTechnologies: Take Xinhuang Dong Autonomous County in Hunan Province as An Example[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Social Science), 2024, 18(3): 87-93. DOI: 10.12371/j.ynau(s).202401007
    [4]YI Changmin, FU Wei, SHI Huishuang. Research on the Deviation of Farmers’ Willingness and Behavior in Green Agriculture Production in Yunnan Province[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Social Science), 2024, 18(1): 84-92. DOI: 10.12371/j.ynau(s).202307083
    [5]ZHANG Yuedong, ZHENG Yifang, XU Jiaxian, WU Xin. Livelihood Capital and Farmers’ Willingness to Withdraw Their Homesteads with Compensation: Based on the Intermediary Role of Citizenship[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Social Science), 2023, 17(6): 80-88. DOI: 10.12371/j.ynau(s).202305128
    [6]XU Lei, GUAN Bo. Study on Farmers ’Willingness to Plant Grain and Its Influencing Factors in Hebei Province[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Social Science), 2023, 17(2): 53-60. DOI: 10.12371/j.ynau(s).202210097
    [7]KE Wenjing, LIANG Liping. The Influence of Wealth and Social Status on Farmers’ Willingness of Professional Fruit Farmers[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Social Science), 2021, 15(5): 70-77, 153. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-390X(s).202011080
    [8]CHEN Xiaoxia, LI Zhongbin. The Fresh Agricultural Products Consumers ’Omni-channel Purchase Intention Based on Structural Equation Model[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Social Science), 2020, 14(6): 76-81. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-390X(s).202003042
    [9]CHEN Shuman, KE Youpeng, WANG Chunwen, WANG Jianan. The Farmers ’ Low Behavior and High Willingness of Safety Production: Taking the Mango Farmers in Hainan Province as An Example[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Social Science), 2020, 14(2): 91-96, 103. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-390X(s).201907023
    [10]SHI Zhiheng, SUN Pengfei, XU Keyuan. Willingness of Farmers on Rural Housing Land Exit: Based on the Investigation in Gansu Province[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Social Science), 2017, 11(2): 42-46. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-390X(s).2017.02.008
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(1)

    1. 张清津. 基于交易成本的农产品市场失灵与三产融合. 理论学刊. 2023(03): 87-95 .

    Other cited types(7)

Catalog

    Article views (465) PDF downloads (21) Cited by(8)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return