• Core Journal of Chinese Humanities and Social Sciences of AMI
  • National Excellent Social Science Journal of Agricultural Universities
  • The most popular journal of Comprehensive Humanities and Social Sciences
Volume 14 Issue 2
Apr.  2020
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Related Articles
CHEN Shuman, KE Youpeng, WANG Chunwen, WANG Jianan. The Farmers ’ Low Behavior and High Willingness of Safety Production: Taking the Mango Farmers in Hainan Province as An Example[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Social Science), 2020, 14(2): 91-96, 103. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-390X(s).201907023
Citation: CHEN Shuman, KE Youpeng, WANG Chunwen, WANG Jianan. The Farmers ’ Low Behavior and High Willingness of Safety Production: Taking the Mango Farmers in Hainan Province as An Example[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Social Science), 2020, 14(2): 91-96, 103. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-390X(s).201907023
shu

The Farmers ’ Low Behavior and High Willingness of Safety Production: Taking the Mango Farmers in Hainan Province as An Example

DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-390X(s).201907023

  • College of Economics and Management, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China

More Information
  • Received Date: July 16, 2019
  • Revised Date: August 08, 2019
  • Available Online: December 22, 2019
  • Published Date: March 31, 2020
    Graphical Abstract
    • Abstract
  • The aim of this study was to provide a reference for how to popularize safety production behavior among farmers and improve the quality of ago-products in China. Using the theory of planned behavior and risk expectation, it analyzed the micro-data collected from mango farmers in Hainan province, and discussed the potential causes of the mismatch of the willingness and behavior of the farmers in safety production. The results showed that farmers have strong will and weak behavior in safety production. Importantly, only by taking realistic factors into consideration, farmers would choose to transform willingness into behavior. Through the empirical analysis, we found that behavioral attitude, subjective norms and perceptual control had significant positive effect on safety production willingness of farmers. In addition, behavioral attitude and subjective norms had significant positive effect on safety production behavior of farmers, while perceptual control had no such significant effect. Furthermore, the risks factors, including output risk, price risk and sales risk, were the key factors that blocked the transformation of farmers ’ safety willingness to their behavior.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References (20)
  • [1]
    KISHOR A. Pesticide Use Knowledge and Practices: A Gender Differences in Nepal[J]. Environmental Research, 2007(104): 305. DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2007.01.001.
    [2]
    杨天和, 薛庆根, 褚保金. 中国农产品质量安全问题研究[J]. 世界农业, 2006(10): 1. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-4433.2006.10.001.
    [3]
    王常伟, 顾海英. 规模化、农户能力对农产品合格率影响的实证分析[J]. 农业技术经济, 2017(11): 4. DOI: 10.13246/j.cnki.jae.2017.11.001.
    [4]
    王建华, 马玉婷, 刘茁. 农户农产品安全生产意愿的主要影响因素分析[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2015, 15(1): 78. DOI: 10.13968/j.cnki.1009-9107.2015.01.013.
    [5]
    江激宇, 柯木飞, 张士云, 等. 农户蔬菜质量安全控制意愿的影响因素分析: 基于河北省藁城市151份农户的调查[J]. 农业技术经济, 2012(5): 35. DOI: 10.13246/j.cnki.jae.2012.05.007.
    [6]
    LIU E, HUANG J. Risk preferences and pesticide use by cotton farmers in China[J]. Journal of Development Economics, 2013(103): 202. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2012.12.005.
    [7]
    袁雪霈, 刘天军, 侯晓康. 交易模式对农户安全生产行为的影响: 来自苹果主产区1001户种植户的实证分析[J/OL]. 农业技术经济, 2019(2): 1.[2019-07-11]. https://doi.org/10.13246/j.cnk.jae.20190524.002. DOI: 10.13246/j.cnki.jae.20190524.002.
    [8]
    杨小山, 林奇英. 经济激励下农户使用无公害农药和绿色农药意愿的影响因素分析: 基于对福建省农户的问卷调查[J]. 江西农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2011, 10(1): 50. DOI: 10.13246/j.cnki.jae.20190524.002.
    [9]
    陈超, 杨海霞. 市场导向、生产经营风险与果农种植品种决策: 基于江苏省桃种植户的实证分析[J]. 湖南农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2019, 20(1): 35. DOI: 10.13331/j.cnki.jhau(ss).2019.01.005.
    [10]
    李昊, 李世平, 南灵. 农户农业环境保护为何高意愿低行为: 公平性感知视角新解[J]. 华中农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2018(2): 18. DOI: 10.13300/j.cnki.hnwkxb.2018.02.003.
    [11]
    许增巍, 姚顺波, 苗珊珊. 意愿与行为的悖离: 农村生活垃圾集中处理农户支付意愿与支付行为影响因素研究[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2016, 30(2): 1. DOI: 10.13448/j.cnki.jalre.2016.037.
    [12]
    张童朝, 颜廷武, 何可, 等. 有意愿无行为: 农民秸秆资源化意愿与行为相悖问题探究: 基于MOA模型的实证[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2019, 33(9): 30. DOI: 10.13448/j.cnki.jalre.2019.262.
    [13]
    卫龙宝, 王恒彦. 安全果蔬生产者的生产行为分析: 对浙江省嘉兴市无公害生产基地的实证研究[J]. 农业技术经济, 2005(6): 4. DOI: 10.13246/j.cnki.jae.2005.06.001.
    [14]
    秦宏, 叶川川. 农户安全农产品生产意愿影响因素研究: 基于湖南省水稻农户调查数据分析[J]. 东岳论丛, 2017, 38(7): 127. DOI: 10.15981/j.cnki.dongyueluncong.2017.07.014.
    [15]
    陈春霞. 行为经济学和行为决策分析: 一个综述[J]. 经济问题探索, 2008(1): 124. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-2912.2008.01.027.
    [16]
    CIALDINI R B, KALLGREN C A, RENO R R. A focus theory of normative conduct: A theoretical refinement and reevaluation of the role of norms in human behavior[J]. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 1991, 24(1): 201. DOI: 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60330-5.
    [17]
    赵亮, 张宁宁, 张峭. 风险预期的农业投入—产出均衡及对收入稳定性的影响: 基于Lyaponof稳定性定理[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2015, 20(1): 213. DOI: 10.11841/j.issn.1007-4333.2015.01.29.
    [18]
    刘明国. 中国特色现代农业风险保障机制: 基于机会成本视角下的贵州烟草农业风险保障机制构建[J]. 贵州社会科学, 2014(10): 124. DOI: 10.13713/j.cnki.cssci.2014.10.028.
    [19]
    黄祖辉, 钟颖琦, 王晓莉. 不同政策对农户农药施用行为的影响[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2016, 26(8): 148. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2104.2016.08.020.
    [20]
    彭泰中, 廖文梅. 信息不对称理论下的农产品市场风险研究: 从农民承担的风险视角分析[J]. 农机化研究, 2007(5): 8. DOI: 10.13427/j.cnki.njyi.2007.05.003.
    • Related Articles

  • Related Articles

    [1]JIAN Wending, MA Dingchou, SHI Dingrun. Analysis of the Herd Behavior in the Decision-making of Farmer Homestead Withdrawal Based on the Theory of Planning Behavior: Evidence from 638 Households Who Have Withdrawn from Their Homesteads in Suzhou District, Jiuquan City, Gansu Province[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Social Science), 2024, 18(6): 146-153. DOI: 10.12371/j.ynau(s).202406229
    [2]ZHOU Wei, WANG Ruiyan, LU Guiping. The Impact of Farmers’ Awareness of Environmental Health Risks on the Willingness to Adopt Environmental ProtectionTechnologies: Take Xinhuang Dong Autonomous County in Hunan Province as An Example[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Social Science), 2024, 18(3): 87-93. DOI: 10.12371/j.ynau(s).202401007
    [3]YI Changmin, FU Wei, SHI Huishuang. Research on the Deviation of Farmers’ Willingness and Behavior in Green Agriculture Production in Yunnan Province[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Social Science), 2024, 18(1): 84-92. DOI: 10.12371/j.ynau(s).202307083
    [4]MA Yanyan, LIU Mei, FAN Chenlu. Effects of Information Acquisition and Risk Bearing on Farmers’ Green Technology Adoption Behavior: Microscopic Evidence from Ningxia[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Social Science), 2023, 17(2): 61-70. DOI: 10.12371/j.ynau(s).202209091
    [5]LI Xuelan, YUAN Hangyu. The Pro-environment Behavior of Family Farms from the Perspective of Resource Endowment and Psychological Expectation: A Case Study of Zhoukou, Henan Province[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Social Science), 2022, 16(6): 57-64. DOI: 10.12371/j.ynau(s).202206123
    [6]SUN Liangjie. Problems and Solutions of Rural Governance in China from the Perspective of Communication Behavior Theory[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Social Science), 2019, 13(6): 20-25. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-390X(s).2019.06.004
    [7]YANG Xianyan, LIU Weiping, HUANG Qiaoping, LIU Fangfang, CHEN Minqi. The Influence of Forestry Reform Related Policies on Farmers' Forestry Production and Management Behavior[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Social Science), 2018, 12(3): 41-46. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-390X(s).2018.03.007
    [8]WANG Min. The Predicament and Countermeasures of the Academic Papers Publishment of Higher Vocational Colleges and Universities Teachers:A Theory of Expectation[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Social Science), 2017, 11(3): 105-110. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-390X(s).2017.03.020
    [9]CHENG Shuping, CHENG Yebin, ZHANG Dehua. Study on the Urbanization Willingness of Agricultural Transfer Population from the Perspective of New Urbanization[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Social Science), 2016, 10(6): 5-8. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-390X(s).2016.06.002
    [10]WANG Yanwei, LI Yongneng, LIU Lufeng, ZHANG Dongyan, WANG Changwei. Discussion on the Path of Ascension of Occupational Career Planning of College Students Based on PDCA Theory[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Social Science), 2015, 9(3): 66-70. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-390X(s).2015.03.013

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(1)

    1. 丁晨，廖思雨，任莹，刘燊源，纪金雄. 多重约束下茶农绿色生产“强意愿弱行为”研究. 现代营销(下旬刊). 2022(05): 52-55 .

    Other cited types(4)

Catalog

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML
    Article views (1752) PDF downloads (4) Cited by(5)

    Copyright Reserved by  Editorial Department of Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Social Science)

    Address:Editorial Department of Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming, China China Pos:650201

    Tel: 0871-65227596 Fax: 0871-65229890 E-mail：ynndxbsk@qq.com

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd.

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return