Livelihood Capital and Farmers’  Willingness to Withdraw Their Homesteads with Compensation: Based on the Intermediary Role of Citizenship

ZHANG Yuedong; ZHENG Yifang; XU Jiaxian; WU Xin

doi:10.12371/j.ynau(s).202305128

Volume 17 Issue 6

Oct. 2023

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Social Science) > 2023 > 17(6): 80-88. > DOI: 10.12371/j.ynau(s).202305128

ZHANG Yuedong, ZHENG Yifang, XU Jiaxian, WU Xin. Livelihood Capital and Farmers’ Willingness to Withdraw Their Homesteads with Compensation: Based on the Intermediary Role of Citizenship[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Social Science), 2023, 17(6): 80-88. DOI: 10.12371/j.ynau(s).202305128

Citation:

PDF (650 KB)

Livelihood Capital and Farmers’ Willingness to Withdraw Their Homesteads with Compensation: Based on the Intermediary Role of Citizenship

DOI: 10.12371/j.ynau(s).202305128

School of Public Management and Law, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China

More Information

Received Date: May 30, 2023
Revised Date: July 05, 2023
Accepted Date: July 05, 2023
Available Online: July 21, 2023

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Based on the China Land Economy Survey (CLES), this study used Probit and KHB models to construct an analytical framework for the impact of urbanization and livelihood capital on farmers’ willingness to withdraw from their homesteads. In order to gain an objective understanding of the factors driving the paid exit of farmers’ homesteads, it was necessary to thoroughly analyze the relationship between livelihood capital and this phenomenon. The results showed that: (1) Livelihood capital promoted farmers’ willingness to withdraw from homestead with compensation.The presence of natural capital, human capital, and social capital could contribute to an increased willingness among farmers to accept compensation and leave their homesteads. physical capital and financial capital could weaken farmers’ willingness to withdraw from homestead with compensation. (2) Citizenization had a mesomeric effect in the relationship between livelihood capital and farmers’ willingness to withdraw from homestead, as well as in the relationship between natural capital, human capital, social capital and farmers’ willingness to withdraw from homestead, and a masking effect in the relationship between financial capital, physical capital and farmers’ willingness to withdraw from homestead. Therefore, in the process of promoting the withdrawal of homesteads, the principle of voluntariness should be followed, and measures such as increasing farmers’ livelihood capital and implementing policies based on households should be taken to enhance their living ability and thus enhance their willingness to withdraw their homesteads with compensation.
- homestead land,
- livelihood capital,
- willingness to withdraw with compensation,
- Probit−KHB model

FullText(HTML)

References (33)

References

[1]	周静. 农村闲置宅基地盘活利用的意愿、障碍及其改革重点分析[J]. 华中农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2022(6): 145. DOI: 10.13300/j.cnki.hnwkxb.2022.06. 014.
[2]	张琛, 彭超, 孔祥智. 农户分化的演化逻辑、历史演变与未来展望[J]. 改革, 2019(2): 5.
[3]	李宪宝, 高强. 行为逻辑、分化结果与发展前景: 对1978年以来我国农户分化行为的考察[J]. 农业经济问题, 2013, 34(2): 56. DOI: 10.13246/j.cnki.iae.2013.02.010.
[4]	魏后凯, 姜长云, 孔祥智, 等. 全面推进乡村振兴: 权威专家深度解读十九届五中全会精神[J]. 中国农村经济, 2021(1): 2.
[5]	张慧利, 夏显力. 心理所有权对农户宅基地退出行为的影响研究: 基于相对剥夺感的中介效应和社会质量的调节效应分析[J]. 中国土地科学, 2022, 36(1): 37. DOI: 10.11994/zgtdkx.20211224.152754.
[6]	彭长生. 农民宅基地产权认知状况对其宅基地退出意愿的影响: 基于安徽省6个县1413户农户问卷调查的实证分析[J]. 中国农村观察, 2013(1): 21.
[7]	夏敏, 林庶民, 郭贯成. 不同经济发展水平地区农民宅基地退出意愿的影响因素: 以江苏省7个市为例[J]. 资源科学, 2016, 38(4): 728. DOI: 10.18402/resci.2016.04.14.
[8]	郭贯成, 戈楚婷. 推拉理论视角下的农村宅基地退出机制研究: 基于南京市栖霞区农户意愿调查[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2017, 26(6): 816. DOI: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201706003.
[9]	邹秀清, 武婷燕, 徐国良, 等. 乡村社会资本与农户宅基地退出: 基于江西省余江区522户农户样本[J]. 中国土地科学, 2020, 34(4): 26. DOI: 10.11994/zgtdkx.20200412.215856.
[10]	邹伟, 王子坤, 徐博, 等. 农户分化对农村宅基地退出行为影响研究: 基于江苏省1456个农户的调查[J]. 中国土地科学, 2017, 31(5): 31. DOI: 10.11994/zgtdkx.20170516.113053.
[11]	杨慧琳, 袁凯华, 陈银蓉, 等. 农户分化、代际差异对宅基地退出意愿的影响: 基于宅基地价值认知的中介效应分析[J]. 资源科学, 2020, 42(9): 1680. DOI: 10.18402/resci.2020.09.04.
[12]	栗滢超. 乡村振兴视角下农村宅基地有偿退出影响因素分析[J]. 经济经纬, 2019, 36(5): 49.
[13]	韩文龙, 刘璐. 权属意识、资源禀赋与宅基地退出意愿[J]. 农业经济问题, 2020(3): 31.
[14]	朱新华, 陆思璇. 风险认知、抗险能力与农户宅基地退出[J]. 资源科学, 2018, 40(4): 698. DOI: 10.18402/resci.2018.04.04.
[15]	杨慧琳, 袁凯华, 朱庆莹, 等. 农户分化、城镇住房对农户宅基地退出意愿的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2021, 30(1): 44. DOI: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj 202101005.
[16]	冯娜娜, 孙博睿, 赵启然, 等. 未来预期、农户分化与宅基地退出抉择[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2021, 30(10): 2383. DOI: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202110 007.
[17]	黄璐水, 罗海波, 钟锋. 贵州省农村宅基地退出的障碍因素调研与对策建议[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2014, 35(4): 94. DOI: 10.7621/cjarrp.1005-9121.20140415.
[18]	邹秀清, 李致远, 谢美辉. 农民产权认知冲突对宅基地退出意愿的影响[J]. 江西社会科学, 2021, 41(2): 228.
[19]	徐忠国. 浙江嘉兴市农户宅基地退出意愿的调查与分析[J]. 上海国土资源, 2013, 34(3): 29. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1329.2013.03.007.
[20]	晋洪涛, 郭秋实, 史清华. “代际剥削”对农户宅基地退出意愿的削弱: 基于农户分化视角[J]. 农村经济, 2022(1): 52.
[21]	陈霞, 李哲敏, 王玉庭. 农户社会资本与宅基地退出意愿: 基于抗险能力的中介效应分析[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2022, 43(10): 232. DOI: 10.7621/cjarrp.1005-9121.20221022.
[22]	孙鹏飞, 张仁慧, 赵凯, 等. 人力资本对农户宅基地退出行为的影响[J]. 经济经纬, 2022, 39(4): 41.
[23]	钱龙, 钱文荣, 郑思宁. 市民化能力、法律认知与农村宅基地流转: 基于温州试验区的调查与实证[J]. 农业经济问题, 2016, 37(5): 59.
[24]	DFID. Sustainable Livelihoods Guidance Sheets[J]. Dfid, 2007.
[25]	马小勇. 家庭禀赋、个人特征与农户劳动力资源配置[J]. 贵州社会科学, 2017(10): 146.
[26]	陈美球, 邝佛缘, 鲁燕飞. 生计资本分化对农户宅基地流转意愿的影响因素研究: 基于江西省的实证分析[J]. 农林经济管理学报, 2018, 17(1): 82. DOI: 10.16195/j.cnki.cn36-1328/f.2018.01.010.
[27]	魏秀华, 杨建州, 曹玮. 人力资本、产业结构与林业经济增长的交互效应: 基于南方集体林区的实证分析[J]. 福建论坛(人文社会科学版), 2019(12): 144.
[28]	赵文娟, 杨世龙, 王潇. 基于Logistic回归模型的生计资本与生计策略研究: 以云南新平县干热河谷傣族地区为例[J]. 资源科学, 2016, 38(1): 136. DOI: 10.18402/resci.2016.01.15.
[29]	涂丽. 生计资本、生计指数与农户的生计策略: 基于CLDS家户数据的实证分析[J]. 农村经济, 2018(8): 76. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7652.2018.07.003.
[30]	魏雪, 袁承程, 刘黎明. 农户城镇化意愿及其影响因素研究: 基于可持续生计分析框架[J]. 农业现代化研究, 2022, 43(1): 134. DOI: 10.13872/j.1000-0275.2022.0003.
[31]	章文光, 徐志毅, 廖冰武, 等. 生计资本、社会环境与贫困人口务工就业意愿[J]. 科学决策, 2022(8): 1. DOI: 10.3773/j.issn.1006-4885.2022.08.001.
[32]	KRISTIAN BERNT KARLSON, ANDERS HOLM, RICHARD BREEN. Comparing Regression Coefficients Between Same-sample Nested Models Using Logit and Probit[J]. Sociological Methodology, 2012, 42(1) : 286. DOI: 10.1177/0081175012444861.
[33]	CHAUDHURI S, JALAN J, SURYAHADI A . Assessing household vulnerability to poverty from cross-sectional data: A methodology and estimates from Indonesia[J]. discussion papers, 2002.

[1]	NIU Weiting, PAN Weiguang, GU Yikang. How Rural Collective Economy Affects Farmers’ Participation in Rural Construction[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Social Science). DOI: 10.12371/j.ynau(s).202412158
[2]	JIAN Wending, MA Dingchou, SHI Dingrun. Analysis of the Herd Behavior in the Decision-making of Farmer Homestead Withdrawal Based on the Theory of Planning Behavior: Evidence from 638 Households Who Have Withdrawn from Their Homesteads in Suzhou District, Jiuquan City, Gansu Province[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Social Science), 2024, 18(6): 146-153. DOI: 10.12371/j.ynau(s).202406229
[3]	FU Wenfeng, ZHAI Yuanqing, GUO Jie. A Study on Government Response, Rural Elites and Farmers’ Willingness to Pay for Rural Environmental Improvement[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Social Science), 2024, 18(6): 110-118. DOI: 10.12371/j.ynau(s).202405140
[4]	YI Changmin, FU Wei, SHI Huishuang. Research on the Deviation of Farmers’ Willingness and Behavior in Green Agriculture Production in Yunnan Province[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Social Science), 2024, 18(1): 84-92. DOI: 10.12371/j.ynau(s).202307083
[5]	TANG Junkang, ZHANG Shiyun, WANG Xiaojie, GE Wang. Land Fragmentation, Embeddedness of Cooperative Organizations and Adoption of Green Technologies by Farmers[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Social Science), 2023, 17(3): 125-134. DOI: 10.12371/j.ynau(s).202211072
[6]	XU Lei, GUAN Bo. Study on Farmers ’Willingness to Plant Grain and Its Influencing Factors in Hebei Province[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Social Science), 2023, 17(2): 53-60. DOI: 10.12371/j.ynau(s).202210097
[7]	HE Shuai. The Effect of Medical Policy on the Training Willingness of the Rural Elderly by Mediating Effect Model with Regulation[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Social Science), 2021, 15(2): 45-50. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-390X(s).202006065
[8]	LIU Xiaohui, CHEN Ying. The Status of the Idle Homestead and Its Influencing Factors: Based on Jingning County of Gansu Province[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Social Science), 2019, 13(3): 56-62. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-390X(s).2019.03.010
[9]	YANG Jieyu, CHEN Qiangqiang. The Farmers' Willingness to Pay For Rural Waste Management in Poverty Stricken Areas:Taking Gansu Province as an Example[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Social Science), 2019, 13(2): 71-77. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-390X(s).2019.02.011
[10]	SHI Zhiheng, SUN Pengfei, XU Keyuan. Willingness of Farmers on Rural Housing Land Exit: Based on the Investigation in Gansu Province[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Social Science), 2017, 11(2): 42-46. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-390X(s).2017.02.008

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(1)

钟国辉. 农户城镇购房会提高宅基地有偿退出意愿吗？. 安徽乡村振兴研究. 2024(04): 39-47 .

Other cited types(2)

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article views (1076) PDF downloads (16) Cited by(3)

Livelihood Capital and Farmers’ Willingness to Withdraw Their Homesteads with Compensation: Based on the Intermediary Role of Citizenship

DOI: 10.12371/j.ynau(s).202305128

Abstract

References

Related Articles

Cited by

Periodical cited type(1)

Other cited types(2)

Catalog

Livelihood Capital and Farmers’ Willingness to Withdraw Their Homesteads with Compensation: Based on the Intermediary Role of Citizenship

DOI: 10.12371/j.ynau(s).202305128

Abstract

References

Related Articles

Cited by

Periodical cited type(1)

Other cited types(2)

Catalog

Export File

Citation

Format

Content