• Chinese Science Citation Database (CSCD) Source Journals
  • A Guide to the Core Journals of China
  • Top 100 Sci-Tech Journals of Chinese Universities
  • Chinese Science and Technical Core Journals
  • China Agriculture and Forestry Core Journals (Category A)
Rui ZHAO, Xinyun REN, Weizhou SU, et al. Study on Distribution of Tuojiang River Basin Gross Ecosystem Product by Value Accounting System Combined with Material Flow Analysis[J]. JOURNAL OF YUNNAN AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY(Natural Science), 2023, 38(3): 520-528. DOI: 10.12101/j.issn.1004-390X(n).202209031
Citation: Rui ZHAO, Xinyun REN, Weizhou SU, et al. Study on Distribution of Tuojiang River Basin Gross Ecosystem Product by Value Accounting System Combined with Material Flow Analysis[J]. JOURNAL OF YUNNAN AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY(Natural Science), 2023, 38(3): 520-528. DOI: 10.12101/j.issn.1004-390X(n).202209031

Study on Distribution of Tuojiang River Basin Gross Ecosystem Product by Value Accounting System Combined with Material Flow Analysis

More Information
  • Received Date: September 18, 2022
  • Revised Date: May 05, 2023
  • Accepted Date: May 05, 2023
  • Available Online: May 10, 2023
  • Published Date: May 29, 2023
  • PurposeTo investigate the changes of gross ecosystem product (GEP) in Tuojiang River Basin from 2018 to 2019, providing insight into design of the ecological compensation mechanism.
    MethodsGEP accounting system combined with material flow analysis was used to implement GEP allocation for river basin affiliated cities, and reveal its temporal variation.
    Results1) The GEP of Tuojiang River Basin from 2018 and 2019 was 412.021 billion yuan and 447.767 billion yuan, respectively, in which climate regulation service value and cultural service value contributed the most, their cumulative contribution was 246.899 billion yuan and 272.114 billion yuan from 2018 to 2019, accounting for 59.9% and 60.8%, respectively. 2) The GEP of Chengdu was the largest in the basin, with 148.487 billion yuan and 158.917 billion yuan in 2018 and 2019, respectively, whilst the GEP in Luzhou was the smallest, with 15.059 billion yuan and 16.848 billion yuan, respectively. However, the GEP increase regarding Luzhou was the highest, reaching 11.9%. 3) Neijiang exported the most (42.768 billion yuan) GEP to the basin in 2018, but it decreased to 9.976 billion yuan in 2019. Chengdu had the largest increase in its GEP supply, from 19.215 billion yuan in 2018 to 32.949 billion yuan in 2019. Luzhou had changed from GEP supply to GEP consumption, from 7.493 billion yuan in 2018 reducing to −0.495 billion yuan in 2019, from the indemnified subject to the compensation subject.
    ConclusionDue to the supply and demand relationship between upstream and downstream in the river basin, GEP shows the characteristics of value flow, and its associated changes are mainly affected by ecological flow, policy incentives and industrial structure adjustment.
  • [1]
    靳乐山, 刘晋宏, 孔德帅. 将 GEP 纳入生态补偿绩效考核评估分析[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(1): 24. DOI: 10.5846/stxb201809252081.
    [2]
    HUANG L, HE C L, WANG B. Study on the spatial changes concerning ecosystem services value in Lhasa River Basin, China[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2022, 29(5): 7827. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-021-16245-8.
    [3]
    ZHANG Z M, GAO J F, FAN X Y, et al. Response of ecosystem services to socioeconomic development in the Yangtze River Basin, China[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2017, 72: 481. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.08.035.
    [4]
    YU H J, XIE W, YANG L, et al. From payments for ecosystem services to eco-compensation: conceptual change or paradigm shift?[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2020, 700: 134627. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134627.
    [5]
    陈默, 林育青, 张建云, 等. 水生态系统生产总值核算体系及应用[J]. 水资源保护, 2023, 39(1): 234. DOI: 10.3880/j.issn.1004-6933.2023.01.030.
    [6]
    欧阳志云, 朱春全, 杨广斌, 等. 生态系统生产总值核算: 概念、核算方法与案例研究[J]. 生态学报, 2013, 33(21): 6747. DOI: 10.5846/stxb201310092428.
    [7]
    石敏俊, 陈岭楠. GEP核算: 理论内涵与现实挑战[J]. 中国环境管理, 2022, 14(2): 5. DOI: 10.16868/j.cnki.1674-6252.2022.02.005.
    [8]
    COSTANZA R, D'ARGE R, GROOT R, et al. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital[J]. Nature, 1997, 387(6630): 253. DOI: 10.1038/387253a0.
    [9]
    谢高地, 鲁春霞, 成升魁. 全球生态系统服务价值评估研究进展[J]. 资源科学, 2001, 23(6): 5. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1007-7588.2001.06.002.
    [10]
    邓娇娇, 常璐, 张月, 等. 福州市生态系统生产总值核算[J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(11): 3835. DOI: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202111.018.
    [11]
    罗芳, 潘安, 陈忠升, 等. 四川省土地利用变化对生态系统服务价值的影响研究[J]. 云南农业大学学报(自然科学), 2021, 36(4): 734. DOI: 10.12101/j.issn.1004-390X(n).202010031.
    [12]
    宋昌素, 欧阳志云. 面向生态效益评估的生态系统生产总值 GEP 核算研究: 以青海省为例[J]. 生态学报, 2020, 40(10): 3207. DOI: 10.5846/stxb202004260999.
    [13]
    牛乐, 王娇月, 郗凤明, 等. 基于生态系统服务付费模型的福州市区域生态补偿额度核算[J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(11): 3805. DOI: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202111.009.
    [14]
    白玛, 卓嘎, 肖燚, 等. 基于生态系统生产总值核算的习水县生态保护成效评估[J]. 生态学报, 2020, 40(2): 499. DOI: 10.5846/stxb201812202767.
    [15]
    牟雪洁, 王夏晖, 张箫, 等. 北京市延庆区生态系统生产总值核算及空间化[J]. 水土保持研究, 2020, 27(1): 265. DOI: 10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2020.01.037.
    [16]
    陈梅, 纪荣婷, 刘溪, 等. “两山”基地生态系统生产总值核算与“两山”转化分析: 以浙江省宁海县为例[J]. 生态学报, 2021, 41(14): 5899. DOI: 10.5846/stxb202008032025.
    [17]
    高玉娟, 张莹. 国有林区生态生产总值GEP核算及生态贡献度研究[J]. 林业经济问题, 2020, 40(2): 173. DOI: 10.16832/j.cnki.1005-9709.2020.02.008.
    [18]
    陈宗铸, 雷金睿, 吴庭天, 等. 国家公园生态系统生产总值核算: 以海南热带雨林国家公园为例[J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(11): 3883. DOI: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202111.010.
    [19]
    OUYANG Z Y, SONG C S, ZHENG H, et al. Using gross ecosystem product (GEP) to value nature in decision making[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2020, 117(25): 14593. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1911439117.
    [20]
    赵筱青, 苗培培, 普军伟, 等. 抚仙湖流域土地利用变化及其生态系统生产总值影响[J]. 水土保持研究, 2020, 27(2): 291. DOI: 10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2020.02.041.
    [21]
    PASTOR A V, TZORAKI O, BRUNO D, et al. Rethinking ecosystem service indicators for their application to intermittent rivers[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2022, 137: 108693. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108693.
    [22]
    刘家倩, 陆建忠, 田晴, 等. 干旱对鄱阳湖流域植被生态系统 GEP 的影响[J]. 华中师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 56(3): 513. DOI: 10.19603/j.cnki.1000-1190.2022.03.019.
    [23]
    马元希, 于德永, 王欣烨, 等. 黄河青海流域生态系统服务价值评估方法研究及时空变化分析[J]. 青海民族大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 48(2): 70. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-9227.2022.02.009.
    [24]
    耿翔燕, 葛颜祥, 张化楠. 基于重置成本的流域生态补偿标准研究: 以小清河流域为例[J]. 中国人口资源与环境, 2018, 28(1): 140. DOI: 10.12062/cpre.20170720.
    [25]
    姚婧, 肖宇婷, 樊敏, 等. 沱江流域主要污染负荷预测及时空分布特征[J]. 中国环境监测, 2022, 38(3): 105. DOI: 10.19316/j.issn.1002-6002.2022.03.12.
    [26]
    吴之见, 杜思敏, 黄云, 等. 基于生态系统生产总值核算的生态保护成效评估: 以赣南地区为例[J]. 生态学报, 2022, 42(16): 1. DOI: 10.5846/stxb202104181007.
    [27]
    樊敏, 肖宇婷, 姚婧, 等. 沱江流域污染负荷与生态系统服务价值空间关系解析研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2022, 31(6): 1354. DOI: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202206016.
    [28]
    彭立, 邓伟, 黄佩, 等. 四川盆地多重生态系统服务景观指数评价与服务簇识别[J]. 生态学报, 2021, 41(23): 9328. DOI: 10.5846/stxb202009062319.
    [29]
    陈效逑, 乔立佳. 中国经济—环境系统的物质流分析[J]. 自然资源学报, 2000, 15(1): 17. DOI: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2000.01.003.
    [30]
    邓伟. 环境保护税税额地方确定权的实施现状与制度完善[J]. 税务研究, 2022(6): 33. DOI: 10.19376/j.cnki.cn11-1011/f.2022.06.021.
    [31]
    李倩娜, 唐洪松, 胡艳. 沱江流域生态补偿模式演变、实践困境及优化对策[J]. 环境保护, 2022, 50(19): 24. DOI: 10.14026/j.cnki.0253-9705.2022.19.003.
    [32]
    杨亮洁, 杨晓蓉, 杨永春. 城市内生竞争力与外生竞争力耦合协调研究: 以成渝城市群为例[J]. 人文地理, 2021, 36(6): 76. DOI: 10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2021.06.009.
    [33]
    王问苈, 时培豪, 黄庆华. 成渝地区双城经济圈绿色创新效率、演变趋势与影响因素研究[J]. 西南大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 44(3): 172. DOI: 10.13718/j.cnki.xdzk.2022.03.020.
    [34]
    郑小强, 蒲泱竹. 成渝双城经济圈产业结构升级与环境效率: 基于非动态面板门槛模型[J]. 软科学, 2021, 35(11): 58. DOI: 10.13956/j.ss.1001-8409.2021.11.10.
    [35]
    朱靖, 余玉冰, 王淑. 岷沱江流域水环境治理绩效综合评价方法研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2020, 29(9): 1995. DOI: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202009010.
    [36]
    张玲玲, 车力, 王宗志, 等. 长江经济带水污染与经济脱钩关系演变及驱动因素研究[J]. 水利水电技术, 2021, 52(12): 47. DOI: 10.13928/j.cnki.wrahe.2021.12.005.
    [37]
    温泉, 马迎群, 秦延文, 等. 成渝地区中小河流水生态环境保护存在的问题与对策[J]. 环境工程技术学报, 2022, 12(2): 493. DOI: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20210639.
    [38]
    蔡绍洪, 谷城, 张再杰. 长江经济带绿色发展水平测度及时空演化特征[J]. 华东经济管理, 2021, 35(11): 25. DOI: 10.19629/j.cnki.34-1014/f.210519005.
    [39]
    ALHARBI O M L, BASHEER A A, KHATTAB R A. Health and environmental effects of persistent organic pollutants[J]. Journal of Molecular Liquids, 2018, 263: 442. DOI: 10.1016/j.molliq.2018.05.029.
    [40]
    邓元杰, 侯孟阳, 贾磊, 等. 基于生态系统服务价值评估的长征沿线革命老区生态补偿策略[J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(1): 159. DOI: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202201.019.
    [41]
    陈影, 文传浩, 沈体雁. 成渝地区双城经济圈绿色发展效率评价及时空演变研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2022, 31(5): 1137. DOI: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202205017.
  • Related Articles

    [1]ZHANG Fan, WANG Hong, ZHANG Xuebing, CHEN Jianjun. Effects of 3-Indole Butyric Acid (IBA) on the Physiological and Biochemical Indexes of Adventitious Root Formation in Peach Rootstock GF677[J]. JOURNAL OF YUNNAN AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY(Natural Science), 2023, 38(6): 1025-1031. DOI: 10.12101/j.issn.1004-390X(n).202303056
    [2]Chuan SHEN, Xia LI, Jianfeng QIN. Effect of Soft Rot on Changes in Endogenous Hormone Content and Transcript Levels of Related Genes in Konjac[J]. JOURNAL OF YUNNAN AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY(Natural Science), 2023, 38(1): 34-40. DOI: 10.12101/j.issn.1004-390X(n).202205053
    [3]Dan WANG, Yaqi LI, Lin CHEN, Junrong TANG, Debing XU, Shi CHEN, Yulan XU, Nianhui CAI. Effects of Stumping Season on the Relationship between Sprouting and Endogenous Hormones of Pinus yunnanensis Seedlings[J]. JOURNAL OF YUNNAN AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY(Natural Science), 2022, 37(5): 853-861. DOI: 10.12101/j.issn.1004-390X(n).202111063
    [4]Lin QI, Xishu TANG, Shihong WANG, Jihui LIU, Zhanyong GAO, Changgui QIU, Xianzhou LYU, Hui GAO. Determination of Cut Stem Content in Cut Filler by Chromatic Aberration Method[J]. JOURNAL OF YUNNAN AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY(Natural Science), 2020, 35(6): 1023-1028. DOI: 10.12101/j.issn.1004-390X(n).202002028
    [5]Jinxin BAI, Guanghai ZHANG, Huachun GUO. Studied on the Correlation between Tuber Growth and Endogenous Hormones in the Leaves and Polysaccharides Contents of Bletilla striata[J]. JOURNAL OF YUNNAN AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY(Natural Science), 2019, 34(2): 309-317. DOI: 10.12101/j.issn.1004-390X(n).201803008
    [6]Jia LI, Jiming LIU, Chang LUO, Mingming DENG, Yinghui HOU. Effect of Different Cutting Sizes and Seasons on the Cutting Rooting of Cinnamomum migao[J]. JOURNAL OF YUNNAN AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY(Natural Science), 2018, 33(5): 911-915. DOI: 10.12101/j.issn.1004-390X(n).201709034
    [7]Hengfeng ZHANG, Qingcui WEI, Gengguo TANG. Changes in the Endogenous Hormones and Carbohydrate Contents in Crocus sativus L. during Floral Bud Differentiation[J]. JOURNAL OF YUNNAN AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY(Natural Science), 2018, 33(4): 684-689. DOI: 10.12101/j.issn.1004-390X(n).201705006
    [8]SUN Liang, WANG Youguo, JIA Wenjie, WANG Qi. Preliminary Study on the Effect of Exogenous NO on the Germination and Endogenous Hormone Contents of Lily Bulb[J]. JOURNAL OF YUNNAN AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY(Natural Science), 2017, 32(4): 685-690. DOI: 10.16211/j.issn.1004-390X(n).2017.04.017
    [9]LI Jin, YANG Rongping, HONG Mingwei, WU Xing'en, WANG Yan, LI Songkai, LI Wenxiang. Variation of Endogenous Hormone in Perfect and Imperfect Flowers of Pomegranate[J]. JOURNAL OF YUNNAN AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY(Natural Science), 2015, 30(6): 986-990. DOI: 10.16211/j.issn.1004-390X(n).2015.06.025
    [10]DU Juan, GUO Huachun. The Correlation Analysis of Potato Seedling seed Germination and Endogenous Hormone Contents[J]. JOURNAL OF YUNNAN AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY(Natural Science), 2015, 30(2): 198-202. DOI: 10.16211/j.issn.1004-390X(n).2015.02.006
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(3)

    1. 陈智华,乔振升,李嘉其,张晓琳,马少杰,何承忠,纵丹. 滇杨TCP基因家族的全基因组鉴定与分析. 生物技术通报. 2024(11): 214-226 .
    2. 徐珊珊,徐大平,洪舟,刘小金,杨曾奖,李毓琦,薛世玉,郭俊誉. 降香黄檀生根的生理机制. 中南林业科技大学学报. 2021(10): 1-10 .
    3. 邹辛联,周安佩,纵丹,甘沛华,费璇,何承忠. 滇杨正/倒扦插苗叶片和树皮组织的转录组比较分析. 西北植物学报. 2019(02): 240-249 .

    Other cited types(3)

Catalog

    Article views (1517) PDF downloads (12) Cited by(6)