• Core Journal of Chinese Humanities and Social Sciences of AMI
  • National Excellent Social Science Journal of Agricultural Universities
  • The most popular journal of Comprehensive Humanities and Social Sciences
Volume 16 Issue 6
Oct.  2022
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Related Articles
LI Shengnan, LI Tan. The Affects of Concurrent Business to Farmer’ s Preference for Green Manure Environmental Attributes[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Social Science), 2022, 16(6): 36-45. DOI: 10.12371/j.ynau(s).202204113
Citation: LI Shengnan, LI Tan. The Affects of Concurrent Business to Farmer’ s Preference for Green Manure Environmental Attributes[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Social Science), 2022, 16(6): 36-45. DOI: 10.12371/j.ynau(s).202204113
shu

The Affects of Concurrent Business to Farmer’ s Preference for Green Manure Environmental Attributes

DOI: 10.12371/j.ynau(s).202204113

  • College of Economics and Management, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, China

More Information
  • Received Date: April 25, 2022
  • Revised Date: June 13, 2022
  • Accepted Date: June 20, 2022
  • Available Online: August 18, 2022
  • Published Date: October 13, 2022
    Graphical Abstract
    • Abstract
  • Green manure is one of the important green agricultural technologies to fix carbon and release oxygen and improve the quality of cultivated land. It is still unclear whether farmers’ concurrent work will affect their preference and heterogeneity of the environmental attributes of green manure. Based on this, this paper uses the Choice experiment method and Random parameter Logit model to conduct empirical tests on small farmers in the four provinces of Hebei, Shandong, Henan and Anhui. The results show that: （1） Concurrent Business has a significant negative impact on farmers’ application of green manure. （2） The willingness to pay for green manure of low concurrent farmers (pure farmers and type Ⅰ farmers) is significantly higher than that of high concurrent farmers (type Ⅱ farmers and non-farmers). Among them, the willingness to pay of pure farmers is 185.627 yuan/（667 m2·a）, the willingness to pay of the type Ⅰ farmers is 270.659 yuan/（667 m2·a）, the willingness to pay of the type Ⅱ farmers is 119.461 yuan/（667 m2·a）, and the willingness to pay of pure farmers is 140.875 yuan/（667 m2·a）. （3） Different types of farmers have obvious differences in the environmental attributes and options of green manure. The pure farmers prefer to improve water quality, improve the quality and fertility of cultivated land, improve air quality, and reduce the environmental attributes of natural disasters. The type Ⅰ farmers prefer to improve water quality and improve environmental attributes of cultivated land quality and fertility. The type Ⅱ farmers prefer environmental attributes that improve water quality and slightly improve air quality. The non-farmers prefer environmental attributes that improve air quality. Accordingly, it propose that: （1） formulate different policies for farmers with different degrees of part-time work; （2） promote social services; （3） increase investment in rural education and improve the rural education system; （4） broaden information channels through the Internet and radio to enhance farmers’ perception of the environment and their awareness of green fertilizer.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References (23)
  • [1]
    黄炎忠, 罗小锋, 刘迪, 等. 农户有机肥替代化肥技术采纳的影响因素: 对高意愿低行为的现象解释[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(3): 632. DOI: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201903014.
    [2]
    王桂霞, 杨义风. 农户有机肥替代化肥技术采纳行为决定: 市场驱动还是政府激励——基于农户分化视角[J]. 农村经济, 2021(4): 102.
    [3]
    钟甫宁, 陆五一, 徐志刚. 农村劳动力外出务工不利于粮食生产吗: 对农户要素替代与种植结构调整行为及约束条件的解析[J]. 中国农村经济, 2016(7): 36.
    [4]
    钟太洋, 黄贤金, 王柏源. 非农业就业对农户施用有机肥的影响[J]. 中国土地科学, 2011, 25(11): 67. DOI: 10.13708/j.cnki.cn11-2640.2011.11.014.
    [5]
    黄炜虹, 齐振宏, 邬兰娅, 等. 农户从事生态循环农业意愿与行为的决定: 市场收益还是政策激励?[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2017, 27(8): 69. DOI: 10.12062/cpre.20170354.
    [6]
    丰军辉, 何可, 张俊飚. 家庭禀赋约束下农户作物秸秆能源化需求实证分析: 湖北省的经验数据[J]. 资源科学, 2014, 36(3): 530.
    [7]
    闵继胜, 胡浩. 江苏省农业生产过程中碳减排潜力的理论与实证分析[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2012, 29(8): 35. DOI: 10.6049/kjjbydc.2011040098.
    [8]
    曹慧, 赵凯. 代际差异视角下粮农保护性耕作投入意愿的影响因素分析[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2018, 18(1): 115. DOI: 10.13968/j.cnki.1009-9107.2018.01.15.
    [9]
    王珊珊, 张广胜. 非农就业对农户碳排放行为的影响研究: 来自辽宁省辽中县的证据[J]. 资源科学, 2013, 35(9): 1855.
    [10]
    刘慧, 翁贞林. 农户兼业、农业机械化与规模经营决策: 基于江西省种植户调研[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2020, 25(2): 235. DOI: 10.11841/j.issn.1007-4333.2020.02.23.
    [11]
    翁贞林, 高雪萍, 檀竹平. 农户禀赋、区域环境与粮农兼业化: 基于9省份1647个粮食种植户的问卷调研[J]. 农业技术经济, 2017(2): 61.
    [12]
    LANCASTER K J. A new approach to consumer theory[J]. The Journal of Political Economy, 1966, 74(2): 132. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-51565-1_34.
    [13]
    李潇. 基于农户意愿的国家重点生态功能区生态补偿标准核算及其影响因素: 以陕西省柞水县、镇安县为例[J]. 管理学刊, 2018, 31(6): 21. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-6511.2018.06.003.
    [14]
    MCFADDEN D. Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice[M]. ZAREMBKA P., Editor. New York: Academic Press, 1973: 105-142.
    [15]
    史恒通, 睢党臣, 吴海霞, 等. 公众对黑河流域生态系统服务消费偏好及支付意愿研究: 基于选择实验法的实证分析[J]. 地理科学, 2019, 39(2): 342.
    [16]
    谭永忠, 陈佳, 王庆日, 等. 基于选择试验模型的基本农田非市场价值评估: 以浙江省德清县为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2012, 27(11): 1981. DOI: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2012.11.017.
    [17]
    王奕淇, 李国平. 基于选择实验法的流域中下游居民生态补偿支付意愿及其偏好研究: 以渭河流域为例[J]. 生态学报, 2020, 40(9): 2877. DOI: 10.5846/stxb201903220543.
    [18]
    畅倩, 李晓平, 谢先雄, 等. 非农就业对农户生态生产行为的影响: 基于农业生产经营特征的中介效应和家庭生命周期的调节效应[J]. 中国农村观察, 2020(1): 76.
    [19]
    褚彩虹, 冯淑怡, 张蔚文. 农户采用环境友好型农业技术行为的实证分析: 以有机肥与测土配方施肥技术为例[J]. 中国农村经济, 2012(3): 68.
    [20]
    高瑛, 王娜, 李向菲, 等. 农户生态友好型农田土壤管理技术采纳决策分析: 以山东省为例[J]. 农业经济问题, 2017, 38(1): 38.
    [21]
    王学婷, 何可, 张俊飚, 等. 农户对环境友好型技术的采纳意愿及异质性分析: 以湖北省为例[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2018, 23(6): 197. DOI: 10.11841/j.issn.1007-4333.2018.06.22.
    [22]
    李坦, 王欣, 宋燕平. 资本禀赋、环境变化感知与农户种植绿肥的环境属性支付意愿: 基于小农户小麦豆科绿肥间作的选择实验例证[J]. 华中农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2021(2): 60. DOI: 10.13300/j.cnki.hnwkxb.2021.02.008.
    [23]
    张丽娟. 非农就业对农户是否选择购买地下水灌溉服务的影响: 基于跨度16年5轮实地追踪调查数据的实证分析[J]. 中国农村经济, 2021(5): 124.
    • Related Articles

  • Related Articles

    [1]WEI XinYu, WANG Lei. The Impact of Agricultural Insurance on Agricultural Economic Resilience[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Social Science), 2025, 19(2): 84-91. DOI: 10.12371/j.ynau(s).202410066
    [2]TIAN Fengxia, ZHANG Rui. Study on the Influence and Spillover Effect of Carbon Emissions Trading on Agricultural Green Total Factor Productivity[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Social Science), 2024, 18(6): 119-127. DOI: 10.12371/j.ynau(s).202407084
    [3]WU Mengyao, DAI Lizheng, MEI Ying. Decision of Land Transfer: A Study on the Effect of Non-agricultural Employment in Adjusting Agricultural Land Rights[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Social Science), 2024, 18(4): 156-162. DOI: 10.12371/j.ynau(s).202403102
    [4]XU Juan, LI Qing, QI Jianling, JIN Jing. ICT, Land Transfer and Farm’ s Income Increase[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Social Science), 2024, 18(1): 19-26. DOI: 10.12371/j.ynau(s).202308066
    [5]CHEN Pengwei, SONG Huiqi, WU Yaojie, CHEN Youcheng. Evaluation of China’ s Rural Economic Resilience and Its Influencing Factors[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Social Science), 2022, 16(5): 43-52. DOI: 10.12371/j.ynau(s).202205061
    [6]GAO Xiu, LIU Congjiu, ZHANG Pengcheng. Analysis of Dynamic Correlation between Agricultural Economic Growth and Input Elements in Shandong Province[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Social Science), 2021, 15(4): 42-50. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-390X(s).202011079
    [7]MA Yanqun, MU Saihua. The Influence of the Transfer of Rural Surplus Labor Force on the Area of Land Transfer under the Dual Structure of Urban and RuralAreas: Based on the Analysis of Instrumental Variable Method[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Social Science), 2020, 14(5): 92-98. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-390X(s).202001035
    [8]NIU Feiliang, HUANG Qinghua, CHEN Yanxi. The Effect of Poverty Alleviation Policy in Yunnan Province[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Social Science), 2019, 13(6): 67-73. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-390X(s).2019.06.011
    [9]CAI Xi, LIU Pengling. Evaluation of Agricultural Land Transfer Efficiency Based on DEA_Malmquist Model in Anhui Province[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Social Science), 2018, 12(5): 94-100. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-390X(s).2018.05.016
    [10]ZHANG Weigang. Temporal and Spatial Differences of Fiscal Policy Effects on Agricultural Supply Structure[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Social Science), 2018, 12(5): 61-69. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-390X(s).2018.05.011

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(6)

    1. 胡英姿. 农业劳动力转移对粮食产量的影响分析：基于东三省面板数据. 山西农经. 2024(19): 101-104 .
    2. 张春芳. 包头市农村土地流转现状浅析. 内蒙古统计. 2024(04): 43-46 .
    3. 何泽洪. 土地流转的历史脉络与多元探索. 农村经济与科技. 2024(19): 17-21 .
    4. 史湘湘. 流通数字化对农业经济发展韧性的影响研究. 中小企业管理与科技. 2024(18): 39-42 .
    5. 何泽洪，何小瑞，叶作龙. 农地流转、农村劳动力迁移与农村农民共同富裕：理论分析与实证检验. 农村经济与科技. 2024(23): 14-19 .
    6. 陈相强. 农业经济中土地流转政策对农民收入增加的影响研究. 河北农机. 2024(24): 151-153 .

    Other cited types(0)

Catalog

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML
    Article views (1517) PDF downloads (12) Cited by(6)

    Copyright Reserved by  Editorial Department of Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Social Science)

    Address:Editorial Department of Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming, China China Pos:650201

    Tel: 0871-65227596 Fax: 0871-65229890 E-mail：ynndxbsk@qq.com

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd.

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return