Impact of Different Film Mulching on the Photosynthetic Characteristics and the Yield of Sweet Potato Varieties

YAN Zheng; ZHANG Xiaohong; WANG Zhengrong

doi:10.16211/j.issn.1004-390X(n).2017.06.004

JOURNAL OF YUNNAN AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY（Natural Science） > 2017 > 32(6): 985-991. > DOI: 10.16211/j.issn.1004-390X(n).2017.06.004

YAN Zheng, ZHANG Xiaohong, WANG Zhengrong. Impact of Different Film Mulching on the Photosynthetic Characteristics and the Yield of Sweet Potato Varieties[J]. JOURNAL OF YUNNAN AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY（Natural Science）, 2017, 32(6): 985-991. DOI: 10.16211/j.issn.1004-390X(n).2017.06.004

Citation:

PDF (1733 KB)

Impact of Different Film Mulching on the Photosynthetic Characteristics and the Yield of Sweet Potato Varieties

Fuzhou Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Fuzhou 350018, China

More Information

Received Date: March 29, 2017
Revised Date: June 29, 2017

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

[Purposes] The experiment was to choose the best mulching method and provide a theoretical basis of high-yield cultivation of sweet potato.[Methods] We tested the yield and the photosynthetic characteristics related indicators of leaves and carried out the relevance analysis, using the straw and soil, black plastic film, and transparent plastic film as the mulching during cultivation of ‘Rongshu-819’.[Results] (1) The yield of the treatment with the black plastic film mulching was the highest, the transparent plastic film treatment lower, and the straw and soil treatment was the lowest. (2) The yield of three treatments all had extremely significant positive correlations with net photosynthesis rate(P_n), intercellular CO₂ concentration(C_i) and the contents of chlorophyll, significant positive correlations with transpiration rate(T_r). (3) In three treatments, P_n all had extremely significant positive correlations with C_i, T_r and the contents of chlorophyll, positive correlations with water use efficiency(WUE), and significant negative correlations with stomatal resistance(S_r).[Conclusion] In this experiment, we concluded that the black plastic film could be used as the mulching in production, which could increase P_n and the yield of sweet potatoes.
- sweet potato,
- photosynthetic characteristics,
- yield

FullText(HTML)

References (33)

References

[1]	邱永祥,邱思鑫,刘中华,等. 福建省沿海地区甘薯发展情况调查与分析[J]. 福建农业学报,2014,29(8):798. DOI: 10. 3969/j.issn.1008-0384.2014.08.018.
[2]	邱永祥,邱思鑫,许泳清,等. 闽西北特色甘薯产业带建设研究[J]. 福建农业学报,2013,28( 10): 1054.DOI: 10. 3969/j.issn.1008-0384.2013.10.025.
[3]	余文英,潘廷国,柯玉琴,等. 不同抗性甘薯品种感染疮痂病后光合机理的研究[J]. 中国生态农业学报,2006,14(4):161.
[4]	许可,周爽,何博文,等. 三个甘薯品种光合特性与生产量关系的比较[J]. 中国农学通报,2008,24(6):172.
[5]	潘妃,邢铮,秦玉芝,等. 几种特色甘薯叶片光合作用特征的研究[J]. 湖南农业科学,2013(21):26.DOI: 10.3969 /j.issn.1006-060X.2013.21.010.
[6]	柯玉琴,潘廷国. NaCl胁迫对甘薯叶片水分代谢、光合速率、ABA含量的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报,2001,7(3):337.DOI: 10. 11674/zwyf.2001.0315.
[7]	谢逸萍,马代夫,王欣,等. 盐胁迫对不同基因型甘薯光合、酶活和生物学特性的影响[J]. 华北农学报,2012,27(增):97.DOI: 10.3969 /j.issn.1000-7091.2012.z1.020.
[8]	李文卿,潘廷国,柯玉琴,等. 土壤水分胁迫对甘薯光合作用的影响及其与耐旱性的关系[J]. 福建农业大学学报,1999,28(3):31.DOI: 10. 3321/j.issn:1671-5470.1999.03.002.
[9]	张云华,王荣富,阮龙. 水分胁迫对甘薯叶绿素荧光和光合特性的影响[J]. 植物生理科学,2005,21(8):208.DOI: 10. 3969/j.issn.1000-6850.2005.08.060.
[10]	靳容,张爱君,史新敏,等. 干旱胁迫下钾对甘薯幼苗光合特性及根系活力的影响[J]. 江苏农业学报,2014,30(5):992.DOI: 10. 3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2014.05.011.
[11]	陆燕元,马焕成,邓西平. 严重土壤干旱后复水条件下转基因甘薯的光合响应特性[J]. 广东农业科学,2014(2):9.DOI: 10.3969 /j.issn.1004-874X.2014.02.003.
[12]	邱永祥,谢小珍,蔡南通,等. 不同氮素及硝化抑制剂对叶菜用甘薯光合特性、茎叶产量及硝酸盐含量的影响[J].西北农林科技大学学报,2006,34(12):58.DOI: 10. 3321/j.issn:1671-9387.2006.12.012.
[13]	陈晓光,李洪民,张爱君,等. 不同氮水平下多效唑对食用型甘薯光合和淀粉积累的影响[J]. 作物学报,2012,38(9):1728.
[14]	魏猛,唐忠厚,陈晓光,等. 不同氮素水平对叶菜型甘薯光合作用及生长特性的影响[J]. 江苏农业学报,2014,30(1):87.DOI: 10. 3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2014.01.015.
[15]	魏峥,贾挺进,陈晓丽,等. 3种观赏甘薯与"徐薯23"的嫁接对茎叶光合生理和块根产量的影响[J]. 河北农业大学学报,2010,33(5):54.
[16]	赵习武,王晨静,周雅倩,等. 不同遮阴处理对四种观赏甘薯光合特性的影响[J]. 北方园艺,2013(24):55.
[17]	徐志刚,崔瑾,焦学磊,等. 光照强度和CO₂浓度间接调控对甘薯无糖组培苗光合特性的影响[J]. 南京农业大学学报,2004,27(1):11.
[18]	崔瑾,徐志刚,李式军,等. 环境调控对甘薯组培苗光合自养和叶片超微结构的影响[J]. 中国农业科学,2004,37(6):821.DOI: 10. 3321/j.issn:0578-1752.2004.06.007.
[19]	陈发炜,赵建国,单明亮,等. 山区覆膜甘薯增产原理与高产开发技术[J]. 农业科技通讯,2001(6):5.
[20]	姜成选,张学芝,马京波,等. 春甘薯覆膜栽培增产因素的研究[J]. 莱阳农学院学报,2002,19(3):176.DOI: 10. 3969/j.issn.1674-148X.2002.03.004.
[21]	王茂勇,王旭芳,李金荣. 脱毒甘薯覆膜高产栽培技术[J]. 作物杂志,2005(3):48.DOI: 10.3969 /j.issn.1001-7283.2005.03.019.
[22]	于文东,于坤令,姜成选,等. 地膜覆盖对甘薯生长发育的影响[J]. 作物杂志,2003(1):18.
[23]	马志民,刘兰服,姚海兰,等. 地膜覆盖对甘薯生长发育的影响[J]. 西北农学报,2012,21(5):103.
[24]	兰孟焦,吴问胜,潘浩,等. 不同地膜覆盖对土壤温度和甘薯产量的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学,2015,43(1):104.
[25]	苏文瑾,雷剑,王连军,等. 不同地膜覆盖对淀粉型和紫色甘薯生长发育的影响[J]. 湖北农业科学,2013,52(22):5417.DOI: 10. 3969/j.issn.0439-8114.2013.22.007.
[26]	付文娥,刘明慧,王钊,等. 覆膜栽培对甘薯生长动态及产量的影响[J]. 西北农业学报,2013,22(7): 107.DOI: 10. 7606/j.issn.1004-1389.2013.07.019.
[27]	李云,宋吉轩,石乔龙,等. 覆膜对甘薯生长发育和产量的影响[J]. 南方农业学报,2012,43(8):1124.DOI: 10. 3969/j:issn.2095-1191.2012.08.1124.
[28]	辛国胜,林祖军,韩俊杰,等. 黑色地膜对甘薯生理特性及产量的影响[J]. 中国农学通报,2010,26(15):233.
[29]	吴炫柯. 不同木薯品种生长发育及一些光合衰老生理特性的研究[D]. 南宁:广西大学,2005.
[30]	黄咏梅,李彦青,吴翠荣,等. 甘薯不同时期干物质积累及光合特征研究[J]. 南方农业学报,2012,43(9):1287.
[31]	CONTRNIC G, BRIANTARI J M. Partitioning of photosynthetic electron flow between CO₂ and O₂ reduction in a C₃ leaf (Phaselolus vulgaris L.) at different CO₂ concentrations and during drought stress[J]. Planta, 1991,183(2):178. DOI: 10.1007/BF00197786.
[32]	LAL A M, KU S B, Edwards G E. Analysis of inhibition of photosynthesis due to water in the C₃ species Houdeum vulgate and Vicia faba:electron transport, CO₂ fixation and carboxylation capacity[J]. Photosynth Research, 1996, 49(1):57.DOI: 10.1007/BF00029428.
[33]	XU D Q, SHEN Y G. Diurnal variations in the photosynthetic efficiency in plants[J]. Acta Phytophysiologica Sinica, 1997, 23(4):410.DOI: 10.1007/s11099-015-0108-3.

[1]	Yanni ZHANG, Ting LIU, Duo YAO, Alamos, Ye JIN, Yan DUAN. Effects of Exercise on Intestinal Microflora, Intestinal Epithelial Morphology and Meat Quality of Sunit Sheep[J]. JOURNAL OF YUNNAN AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY（Natural Science）, 2023, 38(4): 566-572. DOI: 10.12101/j.issn.1004-390X(n).202112050
[2]	Zhongzhen LIN, Jingjing LI, Chaowu YANG, Chunlin YU, Han PENG, Huarui DU, Li WANG, Yiping LIU. Comparative Study on the Growth Performance and Meat Quality of Da-Heng Broilers at Different Ages[J]. JOURNAL OF YUNNAN AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY（Natural Science）, 2021, 36(6): 969-976. DOI: 10.12101/j.issn.1004-390X(n).202101056
[3]	Jingru NIE, Li MA, Shaoxiong LU, Jun DENG, Jintian LI, Lin WANG, Dawei YAN, Xinxing DONG. Comparison of Growth, Carcass and Meat Quality Traits between Diqing Tibetan Pig and Wild Boar×Diqing Tibetan Pig[J]. JOURNAL OF YUNNAN AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY（Natural Science）, 2021, 36(5): 805-810. DOI: 10.12101/j.issn.1004-390X(n).202101047
[4]	Jingquan ZHANG, Tongyong ZHOU. Effect of Foliar Application of Boron Fertilizer on the Yield and Quality of Blueberry[J]. JOURNAL OF YUNNAN AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY（Natural Science）, 2021, 36(3): 553-557. DOI: 10.12101/j.issn.1004-390X(n).202005024
[5]	Xiaoxia ZHOU, Li MA, Mingli LI, Shaoxiong LU, Minjuan LYU, Jingru NIE, Dawei YAN, Xinxing DONG. The Effects of Different Fattening Modes on the Meat Production Performance of Diqing Tibetan Pigs[J]. JOURNAL OF YUNNAN AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY（Natural Science）, 2020, 35(6): 977-982. DOI: 10.12101/j.issn.1004-390X(n).202002006
[6]	Xiaoqin TAN, Zhenzhen DUAN, Caiqiong ZHOU. Effect of Cryopreservation on the Hygienic and Sensory Quality of Vacuum-packed Sour Pork and Prediction of the Shelf Life of Sour Pork[J]. JOURNAL OF YUNNAN AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY（Natural Science）, 2020, 35(5): 871-877. DOI: 10.12101/j.issn.1004-390X(n).201910013
[7]	Wei HU, Xinxing DONG, Kezhong ZHANG, Jiashu HE, Dawei YAN, Hailian LI, Mingli LI, Shaoxiong LU. Polymorphisms of the Exon 5 in PRKAG3 Gene and Its Association with Meat Quality Traits of Xuanhe Pigs[J]. JOURNAL OF YUNNAN AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY（Natural Science）, 2020, 35(1): 26-32. DOI: 10.12101/j.issn.1004-390X(n).201909036
[8]	Xudong WU, Jiading ZHAO, Shaorong GONG, Hongjian ZHANG, Liqin TAN, Guowen FU, Zhenchao YANG, Yingliang ZHU, Guiying ZHAO. Performance Comparative Research on Baoshan Pigs with Duroc×Baoshan Pigs, Berkshire×Baoshan Pigs[J]. JOURNAL OF YUNNAN AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY（Natural Science）, 2018, 33(2): 249-254. DOI: 10.12101/j.issn.1004-390X(n).201704001
[9]	DUAN Hongxing, SUN Weiwei. Research on the Components and Sensory Quality of Fuding and Jinggu White Tea[J]. JOURNAL OF YUNNAN AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY（Natural Science）, 2016, 31(6): 1091-1096. DOI: 10.16211/j.issn.1004-390X(n).2016.06.019
[10]	QI Yanxia, ZHANG Xiaohui, WANG Yuqin, LIU Pei, ZHANG Tianliu, ZHANG Zhenxing. The Expression of MMP2,3,13 Genes in Skeletal Muscle Tissues and Its Relationship with Meat Quality in Cattle[J]. JOURNAL OF YUNNAN AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY（Natural Science）, 2016, 31(1): 62-66. DOI: 10.16211/j.issn.1004-390X(n).2016.01.010

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(1)

陈柔含，邓波，杨琳，高猛峰，张维谊. 新形势下猪肉品质评价方法研究浅析. 上海农业科技. 2025(01): 110-115 .

Other cited types(1)

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article views (1618) PDF downloads (31) Cited by(2)

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Impact of Different Film Mulching on the Photosynthetic Characteristics and the Yield of Sweet Potato Varieties

Abstract

References

Related Articles

Cited by

Periodical cited type(1)

Other cited types(1)

Catalog

Impact of Different Film Mulching on the Photosynthetic Characteristics and the Yield of Sweet Potato Varieties

Abstract

References

Related Articles

Cited by

Periodical cited type(1)

Other cited types(1)

Catalog

Export File

Citation

Format

Content