• Chinese Science Citation Database (CSCD) Source Journals
  • A Guide to the Core Journals of China
  • Top 100 Sci-Tech Journals of Chinese Universities
  • Chinese Science and Technical Core Journals
  • China Agriculture and Forestry Core Journals (Category A)
Advanced Search
Tian BAI, Xinyu WANG, Yawen WU, et al. Study of Temporal and Spatial Evolution Characteristics of Ecological Sensitivity in Luohe District Based on GIS and FLUS[J]. JOURNAL OF YUNNAN AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY（Natural Science）, 2022, 37(4): 710-719. DOI: 10.12101/j.issn.1004-390X(n).202201012
Citation: Tian BAI, Xinyu WANG, Yawen WU, et al. Study of Temporal and Spatial Evolution Characteristics of Ecological Sensitivity in Luohe District Based on GIS and FLUS[J]. JOURNAL OF YUNNAN AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY（Natural Science）, 2022, 37(4): 710-719. DOI: 10.12101/j.issn.1004-390X(n).202201012
shu

Study of Temporal and Spatial Evolution Characteristics of Ecological Sensitivity in Luohe District Based on GIS and FLUS

  • 1.

    College of Landscape Architecture and Art, Henan Agricultural University, International Joint Laboratory of Landscape Architecture of Henan Province, Zhengzhou 450002, China

  • 2.

    College of Horticulture and Landscape, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming 650201, China

  • 3.

    Doctoral School of Landscape Architecture and Landscape Ecology, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Budapest 1114, Hungary

  • 4.

    Department of Art and Design, Huanghe Jiaotong University, Jiaozuo 454950, China

More Information
  • Received Date: January 11, 2022
  • Revised Date: June 07, 2022
  • Accepted Date: June 13, 2022
  • Available Online: June 15, 2022
  • Published Date: July 29, 2022
    Graphical Abstract
    • Abstract
  • PurposeThrough quantitative analysis of the relationship among ecological space indicators, we explored ecological sensitivity distribution rules and characteristics in Luohe district, providing the scientific basis for studying regional territorial space ecological planning.
    MethodsThe ecological sensitivity of Luohe district was studied and predicted by GIS static space analysis and FLUS dynamic simulation based on three levels of topography, ecological environment and urban construction, a total of 11 factors.
    Results1) The percentage of insensitive, low-sensitive, medium-sensitive, high-sensitive, and extreme-sensitive areas in the study area from 2015 to 2020 were 41.47%, 27.06%, 14.94%, 8.90%, 7.63% and 43.61%, 25.76%, 14.55%, 8.47%, 7.61% respectively, and the city tended to develop gradually in the direction of low sensitivity during the five years. 2) The low-sensitive areas were concentrated and had more robust expansion characteristics, while the high-sensitive areas were scattered and had higher protection difficulties. 3) Each factor influencing ecological sensitivity according to the weight was shown as environmental factor>topographic factor>construction factor. 4) ANN-CA simulation showed that active protection of high-sensitive and extreme-sensitive areas would effectively inhibit the spread of low-sensitive and insensitive areas.
    ConclusionBy analyzing the distribution rules, characteristics, and simulation of ecological sensitivity in the study area, planners can put forward scientific ecological protection strategies for urban and rural sustainable development planning.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References (33)
  • [1]
    吕彦莹, 王晓婷, 于新洋, 等. 山东省自然生态空间系统化识别与差异化管控研究[J]. 生态学报, 2022, 42(7): 3010. DOI: 10.5846/stxb202101070063.
    [2]
    许超, 孟楠, 张岩, 等. 城市生态保护红线划定与管理: 以澳门特别行政区为例[J]. 生态学报, 2021, 41(22): 9103. DOI: 10.5846/stxb202105071200.
    [3]
    吴方兴, 毛慧娟, 陈诚, 等. 生态视角下凤凰县建设用地适宜性评价[J]. 国土资源导刊, 2021, 18(3): 18. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-5603.2021.03.006.
    [4]
    黄心怡, 赵小敏, 郭熙, 等. 基于生态系统服务功能和生态敏感性的自然生态空间管制分区研究[J]. 生态学报, 2020, 40(3): 1065. DOI: 10.5846/stxb201811152474.
    [5]
    张晓琳, 金晓斌, 吴心怡, 等. 基于系统保护理念的弹性生态保护空间划定: 以广东省茂名市为例[J]. 生态学报, 2021, 41(18): 7393. DOI: 10.5846/stxb202010192655.
    [6]
    许静, 吴鑫悦, 李文龙. 区域尺度生态保护红线分区研究: 以我国西北地区为例[J]. 草业科学, 2021, 38(7): 1218. DOI: 10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.2020-0587.
    [7]
    胡梦姗, 叶长盛, 卢磊. 南昌市生态空间和生态保护红线划定研究[J]. 生态环境学报, 2021, 30(3): 631. DOI: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2021.03.022.
    [8]
    张贺. 河流生态敏感区分布特征分析与评价[J]. 水利技术监督, 2019(6): 7. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-1305.2019.06.003.
    [9]
    李德旺, 李红清, 雷晓琴, 等. 基于GIS技术及层次分析法的长江上游生态敏感性研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2013, 22(5): 633.
    [10]
    JAGTAP T G, KOMARPANT D S, RODRIGUES R S. Status of a seagrass ecosystem: an ecologically sensitive wetland habitat from India[J]. Wetlands, 2003, 23(1): 161. DOI: 10.1672/0277-5212(2003)023[0161:SOASEA]2.0.CO;2.
    [11]
    达良俊, 杨同辉, 宋永昌. 上海城市生态分区与城市森林布局研究[J]. 林业科学, 2004, 40(4): 84. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-7488.2004.04.015.
    [12]
    白天. 漯河城市地表景观对雨洪资源时空分配的影响[D]. 郑州: 河南农业大学, 2019.
    [13]
    刘荣增, 陈浩然. 基于ANN-CA的杭州城市空间拓展与增长边界研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2021, 30(6): 1298.
    [14]
    李振亚, 魏伟, 周亮, 等. 中国陆地生态敏感性时空演变特征[J]. 地理学报, 2022, 77(1): 150. DOI: 10.11821/dlxb202201011.
    [15]
    王李睿, 邓西鹏, 王晨, 等. 基于生态系统服务重要性与生态敏感性的生态空间划设: 以福建省永春县为例[J]. 生态学杂志, 2022, 41(1): 166. DOI: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.202201.011.
    [16]
    杨琪雪, 潘换换, 吴树荣, 等. 基于GIS的山西省煤田生态环境敏感性评价[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(3): 59. DOI: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2021-0250.
    [17]
    袁领兄, 李坤, 范舒欣, 等. 基于GIS的太原市土地生态敏感性评价[J]. 中国城市林业, 2021, 19(3): 19. DOI: 10.12169/zgcsly.2019.11.11.0001.
    [18]
    赵亚琛, 曾坚. 景观格局优化视角下水环境生态空间适应性发展研究: 以大运河沿线台儿庄古镇为例[J]. 中国园林, 2021, 37(5): 62. DOI: 10.19775/j.cla.2021.05.0062.
    [19]
    黄秋双. 天津市海岸生态敏感性分析[J]. 国土与自然资源研究, 2021(3): 25. DOI: 10.16202/j.cnki.tnrs.2021.03.007.
    [20]
    杜婕, 韩佩杰. 基于ArcGIS区统计的陇南市生态敏感性评价[J]. 测绘与空间地息, 2018, 41(7): 99. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-5867.2018.07.027.
    [21]
    舒波, 何洲历, 王玲, 等. 生态服务因子影响下的乐山地区生态敏感性研究[J]. 生态科学, 2020, 39(4): 184. DOI: 10.14108/j.cnki.1008-8873.2020.04.023.
    [22]
    胡最, 王慧. 多因素约束的城市空间扩张元胞自动机构建及其应用研究[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2020, 22(3): 616. DOI: 10.12082/dqxxkx.2020.190240.
    [23]
    马世发, 艾彬. 基于地理模型与优化的城市扩张与生态保护二元空间协调优化[J]. 生态学报, 2015, 35(17): 5874. DOI: 10.5846/stxb201311032653.
    [24]
    赵金涛, 马逸雪, 石云, 等. 基于ANN-CA模型的黄土丘陵区县域土壤侵蚀演变预测[J]. 中国水土保持科学, 2021, 19(6): 60. DOI: 10.16843/j.sswc.2021.06.008.
    [25]
    何苏玲, 邹凤琼, 王金亮. 基于AHP和MSE赋权法的龙南县生态敏感性评价[J]. 生态学杂志, 2021, 40(9): 2927. DOI: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.202109.022.
    [26]
    韩丽, 周炳江, 明亮, 等. 基于AHP-GIS统计的溪洛渡镇生态敏感性空间评价[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2021, 60(5): 80. DOI: 10.14088/j.cnki.issn0439-8114.2021.05.014.
    [27]
    张会霞, 刘丽荣. 基于GIS的吕梁山区贫困县生态环境敏感性评价[J]. 生态科学, 2020, 39(6): 30. DOI: 10.14108/j.cnki.1008-8873.2020.06.005.
    [28]
    李元征, 冯智志, 李立, 等. 基于GIS的黄河流域陆地生态系统生态敏感性评价[J]. 环境科学与技术, 2021, 44(4): 219. DOI: 10.19672/j.cnki.1003-6504.2021.04.028.
    [29]
    孔祥伦, 李云龙, 韩美, 等. 1986—2016年黄河三角洲土地利用/覆被变化及景观格局分析[J]. 西南林业大学学报(自然科学), 2020, 40(4): 122. DOI: 10.11929/j.swfu.201908006.
    [30]
    LI G J, KOU C H, WANG Y S, et al. System dynamics modelling for improving urban resilience in Beijing, China[J]. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2020, 161: 104954. DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104954.
    [31]
    HUANG L Y, WANG J, CHENG H G. Spatiotemporal change in ecological network resilience in the Shandong Peninsula urban agglomeration[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2022, 339: 130681. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130681.
    [32]
    刘建华, 张启斌, YANG D, 等. 基于MCR-ANN-CA模型的包头市生态用地演变模拟[J]. 农业机械学报, 2019, 50(2): 187. DOI: 10.6041/j.issn.1000-1298.2019.02.021.
    [33]
    武泽民, 余哲修, 李瑶, 等. 滇池流域土地利用演变及景观生态安全评价研究[J]. 西南林业大学学报(自然科学), 2021, 41(3): 122. DOI: 10.11929/j.swfu.202004008.
    • Related Articles

  • Related Articles

    [1]WANG Jing, LEI Chunyun, LIANG Xiang, XUE Shaowei, XIONG Yan, WANG Wenyu, ZHANG Jianbin. Characteristics of Filter Feeding Organs and Digestive Tissues, and Feeding Strategies of Hypophthalmichthys molitrix and Aristichys nobilis[J]. JOURNAL OF YUNNAN AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY（Natural Science）, 2023, 38(6): 942-947. DOI: 10.12101/j.issn.1004-390X(n).202202005
    [2]Xu WANG, Zhenzhen WANG, Jun ZHOU. Study on Control Strategy of Tandem Hybrid Tractor Considering Battery Life Decay[J]. JOURNAL OF YUNNAN AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY（Natural Science）, 2023, 38(3): 529-536. DOI: 10.12101/j.issn.1004-390X(n).202111070
    [3]Jianbin GUO, Ying ZHANG, Zhiwei ZHANG, Lei HOU, Weilian ZENG. Study of Land Use Intensity Change and Its Spatial Heterogeneity of Nyingchi City in Tibet[J]. JOURNAL OF YUNNAN AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY（Natural Science）, 2023, 38(3): 511-519. DOI: 10.12101/j.issn.1004-390X(n).202209064
    [4]Pengfei LI, Xiaofen YU, Shuming YANG, Yanmei ZHU, Bingli ZOU, Tianyang XU, Ying WANG, Xueli QIU. Spatial Variability Characteristics of Medium and Micro Nutrients in Wenshan Tobacco-growing Soil Based on GIS[J]. JOURNAL OF YUNNAN AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY（Natural Science）, 2022, 37(4): 703-709. DOI: 10.12101/j.issn.1004-390X(n).202103031
    [5]Hanwen CUI, Guangbin YANG, Wengang CUI. Distribution Characteristics and Risk Assessment of Soil Heavy Metal in Karst Peri-urban Areas in Guanshan Lake District, Guiyang City[J]. JOURNAL OF YUNNAN AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY（Natural Science）, 2022, 37(2): 351-357. DOI: 10.12101/j.issn.1004-390X(n).202104024
    [6]Dongmei LU, Cuiping ZHANG, Yufen WANG, Xianbin LIU, Shuying LI, Jiliang WEN, Chunrong ZHU, Yuanqing ZHOU. Health Risk Assessment for Drinking Water Source of the Feijinghai Reservoir in Hongta District of Yuxi City[J]. JOURNAL OF YUNNAN AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY（Natural Science）, 2020, 35(2): 345-352. DOI: 10.12101/j.issn.1004-390X(n).201905034
    [7]Hongbo ZHAO, Lutao GAO. Research on Planting and Fertilization of Patatos Based on GIS County: A Case Study of Xundian Hui & Yi Nationality Autonomous County in Yunnan Province[J]. JOURNAL OF YUNNAN AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY（Natural Science）, 2020, 35(2): 332-337, 352. DOI: 10.12101/j.issn.1004-390X(n).201909013
    [8]Li WU, Dejiang LIU. Ecological Security Evaluation of the Cultivated Land in Yuxi Based on GA-BP Neural Network[J]. JOURNAL OF YUNNAN AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY（Natural Science）, 2019, 34(5): 874-883. DOI: 10.12101/j.issn.1004-390X(n).201805041
    [9]De ZHANG, Guangxiong HE, Huiying LONG, Liangtao SHI. Effects of Phosphorus Addition on the Relationship between the Aboveground and Underground Biomass of Stylosanthes in Dry-hot Valley[J]. JOURNAL OF YUNNAN AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY（Natural Science）, 2018, 33(2): 294-300. DOI: 10.12101/j.issn.1004-390X(n).201702048
    [10]LI Xingyong, SHAO Xiaodong, MA Kebo, SHANG Zhiwei, JIANG Yangming, GUO Jifa. Group-based Image Interpretation on Tobacco Field Planning and Landscape Pattern Analysis on Baishui of Luxi County, Yunnan Province[J]. JOURNAL OF YUNNAN AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY（Natural Science）, 2015, 30(1): 119-124. DOI: 10.16211/j.issn.1004-390X(n).2015.01.020

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(6)

    1. 裴曾莉，何松膛，王道杰，林勇明，杨鸿飞，赵鹏，杨雨睛. 黑沙河泥石流滩地系统敏感性和景观脆弱性时空演变特征. 武汉大学学报(理学版). 2025(01): 62-72 .
    2. 管嘉文，杨国福，陈昊，王振国，王锡钰，徐斌. 基于荒野保护的浙江省生态保护红线动态优化. 应用生态学报. 2025(01): 238-248 .
    3. 闫天亮，王承武，陈梦茜，陈暄，赵文静. 基于土地生态敏感性评价的生态产品价值分区实现研究——以阿勒泰市为例. 干旱区地理. 2024(04): 612-621 .
    4. 贾海锋，马小波，王万宾，刘岳雄，罗怀秀，李森. 典型喀斯特地区生态保护与修复空间识别-以石林彝族自治县为例. 云南农业大学学报(自然科学). 2024(02): 145-154 .
    5. 赵晶. 基于AHP-CV法的赤水市生态敏感性评价. 农业技术与装备. 2024(10): 37-41 .
    6. 倪梦静，王天聪，谢祥财. 基于GIS的沿海城市宁德市生态敏感性评价研究. 黑龙江生态工程职业学院学报. 2023(02): 10-14 .

    Other cited types(3)

Catalog

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML
    Article views (2179) PDF downloads (26) Cited by(9)
    Turn off MathJax
    Article Contents
    Abstract
    References
    Related Articles
    • Copyright © Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University Editorial Department
    • Address: Room 108, Adult Education Building, Yunnan Agricultural University, No. 95 Heijin Road, Kunming, Yunnan Postal Code: 650201
    • Tel: +86-871-65227711 E-mail: ynauzkxb@foxmail.com

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd.

    Return