• Core Journal of Chinese Humanities and Social Sciences of AMI
  • National Excellent Social Science Journal of Agricultural Universities
  • The most popular journal of Comprehensive Humanities and Social Sciences
YANG Yijie. The Integrity of Rural Land System Reform[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Social Science), 2024, 18(5): 111-117. DOI: 10.12371/j.ynau(s).202404113
Citation: YANG Yijie. The Integrity of Rural Land System Reform[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Social Science), 2024, 18(5): 111-117. DOI: 10.12371/j.ynau(s).202404113

The Integrity of Rural Land System Reform

DOI: 10.12371/j.ynau(s).202404113
More Information
  • Received Date: April 24, 2024
  • Revised Date: May 29, 2024
  • Accepted Date: June 02, 2024
  • Available Online: June 23, 2024
  • There are two aspects of significance in the integrity of the rural land system reform, namely, the realization of equality of land rights, and the effectiveness , openness and compatibility of the land rights system to meet the needs of practical development. The legalization of the policy of “separation of three rights” for household contracted land, and the extension of the contract period, the update of land expropriation rules, the entry into the market of collective operated construction land and the indexed trading of construction land, and the implementation of the policy of “separation of three rights” for rural homesteads, are the main manifestations of the overall advancement of the reform of the rural land system. Land use planning and its implementation as well as the legal status of the government in the trading of land rights are the two basic factors for analyzing the scientificity and effectiveness of land rights trading rules. To further promote the reform of the rural land system as a whole and achieve its stated policy objectives, it is necessary to establish a scientific system of rural collective property rights, deepen the land income distribution mechanism, and improve the land use planning mechanism and land index trading mechanism guided by market demand.

  • [1]
    陶然, 汪晖. 中国尚未完成之转型中的土地制度改革: 挑战与出路[J]. 国际经济评论, 2010(2): 93.
    [2]
    祝天智, 刘文丽. 征地与相关改革的非协同性问题探讨[J]. 理论探索, 2016(5): 77. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-4175.2016.05.013.
    [3]
    黄小虎. 征地制度改革和集体建设用地流转[J]. 经济研究参考, 2008(31): 13. DOI: 10.16110/j.cnki.issn2095-3151.2008.31.006.
    [4]
    高圣平. 论集体建设用地使用权的法律构造[J]. 法学杂志, 2019(4): 13.
    [5]
    赵红梅. 集体经营性建设用地入市的价值取向与制度安排[J]. 环球法律评论, 2022(4): 5. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6728.2022.04.002.
    [6]
    汪洋. “三块地”改革背景下集体建设用地使用权的再体系化[J]. 云南社会科学, 2022(3): 137. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8691.2022.03.015.
    [7]
    孙秋鹏. 集体经营性建设用地: 入市与地方政府行为[J]. 上海经济研究, 2020(11): 5. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-1309.2020.11.002.
    [8]
    陈小君. 深化农村土地制度联动改革的法治目标[J]. 法学家, 2023(3): 15.
    [9]
    马翠萍. 集体经营性建设用地制度探索与效果评价: 以全国首批农村集体经营性建设用地入市试点为例[J]. 中国农村经济, 2021(11): 35.
    [10]
    胡大伟. 土地征收与集体经营性建设用地入市利益协调的平衡法理与制度设计[J]. 中国土地科学, 2020(9): 10. DOI: 10.11994/zgtdkx.20200731.100626.
    [11]
    华子岩. 土地征收成片开发的制度架构与风险控制[J]. 中国土地科学, 2022(2): 28. DOI: 10.11994/zgtdkx.20220117.101555.
    [12]
    罗秀丽, 杨忍. 农村建设用地整治的空间生产机制及其效应: 以广东省窑塘村为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2022(8): 2085. DOI: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20220811.
    [13]
    金晓斌, 罗秀丽, 周寅康. 试论全域土地综合整治的基本逻辑、关键问题和主要关系[J]. 中国土地科学, 2022(11): 1. DOI: 10.11994/zgtdkx.20220920.095400.
    [14]
    陆铭, 楼帅舟, 李鹏飞. 大国的城乡融合: 城市化和相关改革的进展与问题[J]. 中央财经大学学报, 2023(12): 101.
    [15]
    祝之舟. 农村土地承包关系自主调整机制的法理内涵与体系完善[J]. 法学家, 2021(2): 86.
    [16]
    胡凌啸, 曹丹丘, 刘余. 二轮延包下的土地调整问题: 来自延包试点的启示[J]. 南京农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2023(2): 144.
    [17]
    郑志浩, 高杨. 中央“不得调地”政策: 农民的态度与村庄的土地调整决策: 基于对黑龙江、安徽、山东、四川、陕西 5 省农户的调查[J]. 中国农村观察, 2017(4): 72.
  • Related Articles

    [1]ZHANG Qihui. The Impact of Rural Land System Reform on Fiscal Pressure in County Governments: A Quasi-natural Experiment Based on the “Three Land Plots” Reform Pilot[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Social Science), 2024, 18(6): 140-145. DOI: 10.12371/j.ynau(s).202408084
    [2]XIN Bixin. The Generation Mechanism of the Market Entry System of Rural Collective Commercial Construction Land at the County Level: Empirical Analysis Based on Multiple-streams Framework[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Social Science), 2023, 17(3): 118-124. DOI: 10.12371/j.ynau(s).202211138
    [3]LI Chengxing. Innovative Ideas on the Rural Pension Security Model under the Background of Land Right Confirmation[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Social Science), 2022, 16(1): 65-70. DOI: 10.12371/j.ynau(s).202101105
    [4]YANG Yating, WANG Simin. The Law Path of “Implementing Collective Ownership of Homestead” under the Background of Three Rights Separation[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Social Science), 2021, 15(3): 89-95. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-390X(s).202007050
    [5]XIANG Dingyi, WANG Jiayi. Analysis on the System of Land Management Right in Rural Land Contracting Law[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Social Science), 2021, 15(1): 97-104. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-390X(s).202005022
    [6]QIN Wen. Conflict and Protection of Female Land Rights and Interests from the Perspective of Structural Functionalism: Taking the Distribution of Female Land Requisition as an Example[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Social Science), 2020, 14(5): 29-35. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-390X(s).201912049
    [7]LI Li, HUANG Peifeng, CHEN Nafei. Government Subsidy, Property Rights and Operation Performance of Agricultural Enterprises[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Social Science), 2019, 13(6): 83-90. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-390X(s).2019.06.013
    [8]SHI Weimin, HU Rui. The Land Use Control Law Consummation in the Farmland Management Right Circulation[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Social Science), 2019, 13(5): 102-107. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-390X(s).2019.05.016
    [9]CHEN Cuirong, LIU Weiping, CHEN Siying. Study on Reform of Collective Forest Right in Zhenghe County Lintun Village in the Perspective of Economies of Scale[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Social Science), 2016, 10(3): 55-59. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-390X(s).2016.03.012
    [10]GAO Huiling, QIN Ying, LI Changhan. Skill Inheritors Training and Knowledge Property Rights Protection Under the Perspective of Intangible: A Case of Yunnan Province[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Social Science), 2015, 9(1): 30-33. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-390X(s).2015.01.007
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(1)

    1. 张起慧. 农村土地制度改革对县级政府财政压力的影响研究——基于“三块地”改革试点的准自然实验. 云南农业大学学报(社会科学). 2024(06): 140-145 . 本站查看

    Other cited types(0)

Catalog

    Article views (411) PDF downloads (44) Cited by(1)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return