Citation: | WANG Xiaoxuan, HU Zijun. The Impact of Health Shocks on Changes in Livelihood Strategies of Middle-aged and Elderly Farmers: Evidence from CHARLS Panel Data[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Social Science), 2023, 17(5): 144-153. DOI: 10.12371/j.ynau(s).202305005 |
Based on the sustainable livelihood analysis framework, this paper analyzed the impact and mechanism of health shocks on the livelihood strategy choices of middle-aged and elderly farmers by using CHARLS data and multi-period double difference method. The results showed that, middle-aged and elderly farmers were more likely to choose agricultural livelihood strategies rather than part-time agricultural and non-farm livelihood strategies after suffering health shocks. The heterogeneity analysis showed that, health shocks more significantly encouraged male farmers to choose agro-based livelihood strategies rather than part-farm livelihood strategies. The health shock, on the other hand, discouraged female farmers from engaging in off-farm livelihood activities. Moreover, the health impact on low-educated farmers was more pronounced, causing them to choose agricultural livelihood strategies and abandon agricultural part-time and non-agricultural livelihood activities. The mechanism test proved that, the lower the level of livelihood capital of middle-aged and elderly farmers, the more likely their livelihood strategy choices were to change due to health shocks. Accordingly, this paper put forward suggestions that, the government should strengthen health poverty alleviation, which provided a theoretical reference for promoting the diversified development of livelihood strategies of middle-aged and elderly farmers.
[1] |
张峻豪, 何家军. 能力再造: 可持续生计的能力范式及其理论建构[J]. 湖北社会科学, 2014(9): 41. DOI: 10.13660/j.cnki.42-1112/c.012794.
|
[2] |
秦立建, 程杰, 潘杰. 健康对农民工劳动供给时间的影响[J]. 统计与信息论坛, 2015, 30(3): 103. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-3116.2015.03.016.
|
[3] |
杨志海, 麦尔旦·吐尔孙, 王雅鹏. 健康冲击对农村中老年人农业劳动供给的影响: 基于CHARLS数据的实证分析[J]. 中国农村观察, 2015(3): 24.
|
[4] |
魏宁, 苏群. 健康与农村劳动力非农就业参与: 基于联立方程模型的实证研究[J]. 农村经济, 2013(7): 113.
|
[5] |
张义, 王爱君, 黄寰. 环境污染、健康冲击与劳动参与: 来自CFPS调查经验证据[J]. 西北人口, 2023, 44(2): 81. DOI: 10.15884/j.cnki.issn.1007-0672.2023.02.007.
|
[6] |
杨世龙, 赵文娟, 徐蕊, 等. 元江干热河谷地区农户生计策略选择机制分析: 以新平县为例[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2016, 30(7): 19. DOI: 10.13448/j.cnki.jalre.2016.209.
|
[7] |
伍艳. 贫困山区农户生计资本对生计策略的影响研究: 基于四川省平武县和南江县的调查数据[J]. 农业经济问题, 2016, 37(3): 88. DOI: 10.13246/j.cnki.iae.2016.03.011.
|
[8] |
王智新, 邢双美, 韩承斌. 自由贸易试验区与跨境电商发展: 来自准自然实验的证据[J]. 世界经济研究, 2023(2): 19. DOI: 10.13516/j.cnki.wes.2023.02.005.
|
[9] |
石大千, 丁海, 卫平, 等. 智慧城市建设能否降低环境污染[J]. 中国工业经济, 2018(6): 117. DOI: 10.19581/j.cnki.ciejournal.2018.06.008.
|
[10] |
袁东波, 陈美球, 廖彩荣, 等. 土地转出农户的生计资本分化及其生计策略变化[J]. 水土保持研究, 2019, 26(4): 349. DOI: 10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2019.04.052.
|
[11] |
BECK T, LEVINE R, LEVKOV A. Big bad banks? The winners and losers from bank deregulation in the United States[J]. The Journal of Finance, 2010, 65(5): 1637. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2010.01589.x.
|
[12] |
HECKMAN J J, ICHIMURA H, TODD P. Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator[J]. The review of economic studies, 1998, 65(2): 261. DOI: 10.1111/1467-937X.00044.
|
[13] |
白俊红, 张艺璇, 卞元超. 创新驱动政策是否提升城市创业活跃度: 来自国家创新型城市试点政策的经验证据[J]. 中国工业经济, 2022(6): 61. DOI: 10.19581/j.cnki.ciejournal.2022.06.016.
|
[14] |
阳灿, 刘明显, 刘忍妹. 科技金融政策提高了企业全要素生产率吗:来自中国工业企业的证据[J]. 武汉金融, 2022(10): 33. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-3540.2022.10.004.
|
1. |
钟国辉. 农户城镇购房会提高宅基地有偿退出意愿吗?. 安徽乡村振兴研究. 2024(04): 39-47 .
![]() |