任中秀. 质疑“撤村并居”[J]. 云南农业大学学报(社会科学), 2012, 6(1): 5-8.
引用本文: 任中秀. 质疑“撤村并居”[J]. 云南农业大学学报(社会科学), 2012, 6(1): 5-8.
REN Zhong-xiu. Questioning on “Withdrawing Villages and Combining Residences”[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Social Science), 2012, 6(1): 5-8.
Citation: REN Zhong-xiu. Questioning on “Withdrawing Villages and Combining Residences”[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Social Science), 2012, 6(1): 5-8.

质疑“撤村并居”

Questioning on “Withdrawing Villages and Combining Residences”

  • 摘要: 撤村并居近年来已在全国许多省市实行。但其政策依据增减挂钩办法与《土地管理法》等上位法相矛盾,其合法性值得质疑;撤村并居及增减挂钩办法类似于国外的土地发展权制度,但却很不完善,其妥当性值得质疑;撤村并居的实施效果存在外部性,效果并不理想;撤村并居不能解决中国的用地矛盾,应构建完备的土地发展权制度并完善相关配套制度。

     

    Abstract: In recent years withdrawing villages and combining residences in many provinces and cities have been implemented in the country. However its legitimacy is questionable because its policy means of increasing anddecreasing has contradictions with Land Management Law and other upper laws; and its appropriateness is questionable because it is not similar to thesystem of land development rights abroad and it is imperfect; and the results of its implementation effectiveness with externality are unsatisfactory; whichcan not solve Chinas land problem. We should build a comprehensive system of land development right and improve the supporting systems.

     

/

返回文章
返回