董晓松. 事后不作为能否单独成立犯罪研究[J]. 云南农业大学学报(社会科学), 2009, 4(6): 11-16.
引用本文: 董晓松. 事后不作为能否单独成立犯罪研究[J]. 云南农业大学学报(社会科学), 2009, 4(6): 11-16.
DONG Xiao-song. A Research on Whether the Omission after Accomplishing Crime Constituting A Crime[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Social Science), 2009, 4(6): 11-16.
Citation: DONG Xiao-song. A Research on Whether the Omission after Accomplishing Crime Constituting A Crime[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Social Science), 2009, 4(6): 11-16.

事后不作为能否单独成立犯罪研究

A Research on Whether the Omission after Accomplishing Crime Constituting A Crime

  • 摘要: 从交通肇事中故意杀人切入,对基本犯罪可以引起作为义务予以证成,并对该类犯罪如何处理等价性问题进行了说明。在具体判断上,应将视野置于整个犯罪事实并加以通盘考虑,惟此才能既不违背禁止重复评价原则,又不使行为人获得刑法处断上之不当利益。

     

    Abstract: By cutting in intentional homicide of traffic accident crime,this paper proves that the action of antecedence may cause the duty of action,then concern how to handle the equal-value issues. It should be evaluated on the whole in concrete judgment,which means one hand we should think about the correlation between the act after the accomplishment of crime and the basic crime, on the other hand, we should try to avoid prohibiting the repeated evaluation on the same act.

     

/

返回文章
返回