吴正荣. 论中华文化心理结构中的两种生命价值取向——儒士诗与僧人诗比较研究[J]. 云南农业大学学报(社会科学), 2010, 4(5): 100-103.
引用本文: 吴正荣. 论中华文化心理结构中的两种生命价值取向——儒士诗与僧人诗比较研究[J]. 云南农业大学学报(社会科学), 2010, 4(5): 100-103.
WU Zheng-rong. Dissertation on the Two Types of Life Value Orientation in the Mental Structure of Chinese Culture:Research and Comparison of the Scholastic and Monastic Poems[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Social Science), 2010, 4(5): 100-103.
Citation: WU Zheng-rong. Dissertation on the Two Types of Life Value Orientation in the Mental Structure of Chinese Culture:Research and Comparison of the Scholastic and Monastic Poems[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Social Science), 2010, 4(5): 100-103.

论中华文化心理结构中的两种生命价值取向——儒士诗与僧人诗比较研究

Dissertation on the Two Types of Life Value Orientation in the Mental Structure of Chinese Culture:Research and Comparison of the Scholastic and Monastic Poems

  • 摘要: “儒士”自觉地承担着儒家的社会意识,而“僧人”则以完成生命的超越为己任。在三教合流的传统中,“儒士”和“僧人”的内在文化构成并不具备严格意义上的界分,常常互有融含。故而,论述时只能抽象出其“共相”意义上的概念,各置于“儒”“释”系统中剖析其最高价值追求,得出儒士诗重社会伦理,而僧人诗则重解构文化局限,求证生命本源的结论。

     

    Abstract: Scholars consciously assume the responsibility of disseminating the social ideology of Confucianism,whereas monks assume the accomplishment of transcending life as their personal responsibility. In the tradition of the confluent of the 3 religions, there is no strict segregation in purpose between the intrinsic cultural structure of the “scholars” and the “monks”,and they often have mutually harmonious implications. As such, in the dissertation, it is only possible to abstract the “common bearing” in the conceptual meaning,each is placed in the “ru” or scholastic and “shi” or monastic system to analyze their highest level pursuit, concluding that the scholastic poems place emphasis on social ethics while the monastic poems place importance in the liberation from cultural structure limitations and strive for the origin of life.

     

/

返回文章
返回