王靖康. 刑事诉讼中被追诉人虚假陈述问题研究[J]. 云南农业大学学报(社会科学), 2018, 12(2): 95-102. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-390X(s).2018.02.016
引用本文: 王靖康. 刑事诉讼中被追诉人虚假陈述问题研究[J]. 云南农业大学学报(社会科学), 2018, 12(2): 95-102. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-390X(s).2018.02.016
WANG Jingkang. The False Statement of the Accused in Criminal Procedure[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Social Science), 2018, 12(2): 95-102. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-390X(s).2018.02.016
Citation: WANG Jingkang. The False Statement of the Accused in Criminal Procedure[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Social Science), 2018, 12(2): 95-102. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-390X(s).2018.02.016

刑事诉讼中被追诉人虚假陈述问题研究

The False Statement of the Accused in Criminal Procedure

  • 摘要: 在刑事诉讼中,口供承载着多重功能,在大多司法办案人员眼中是案件基础。在我国司法实践中,被追诉人说谎话有恃无恐,做出虚假陈述的情况屡见不鲜,其会降低诉讼效率,甚至会引发冤假错案。究其原因,是我国对于被追诉人承担虚假陈述法律责任规制不够精细和完善。基于此,以2016年6月至2017年6月间与虚假陈述相关的一审刑事判决书为数据来源,从虚假陈述时间、动机、共犯、是否追责以及追什么责等几个方面对刑事诉讼中被追诉人虚假陈述的中国现状进行分析,并进一步探讨是否应追究被追诉人虚假陈述法律责任、如何追责以及追究其法律责任的程序意义等问题。

     

    Abstract: During criminal procedure, the confession have diverse functions and most judicial officers think it is the foundation of criminal cases. However, in Chinese judicial practice, the accused lies so casually and there are so many false statement of the accused that it decreases the efficiency of proceeding and results in injustices. As for the legal responsibility of false statement of the accused, the legal standard is vague and absent. Based on the first criminal judgment papers from June 2016 to June 2017, this paper research Chinese current situation of the false statement of the accused from aspects of the time of false statement, the motive, joint offenders and legal responsibility and makes further research on if the legal responsibility of false statement should be pursued, how to pursue the legal responsibility of false statement and procedure value.

     

/

返回文章
返回