端义镭. 对二语写作书面纠正性反馈的再认识——基于二语习得理论视角[J]. 云南农业大学学报(社会科学), 2016, 10(4): 100-105. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-390X(s).2016.04.019
引用本文: 端义镭. 对二语写作书面纠正性反馈的再认识——基于二语习得理论视角[J]. 云南农业大学学报(社会科学), 2016, 10(4): 100-105. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-390X(s).2016.04.019
DUAN Yilei. Reconsidering Written Corrective Feedback in L2 Writing: From the Perspective of SLA Theories[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Social Science), 2016, 10(4): 100-105. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-390X(s).2016.04.019
Citation: DUAN Yilei. Reconsidering Written Corrective Feedback in L2 Writing: From the Perspective of SLA Theories[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Social Science), 2016, 10(4): 100-105. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-390X(s).2016.04.019

对二语写作书面纠正性反馈的再认识——基于二语习得理论视角

Reconsidering Written Corrective Feedback in L2 Writing: From the Perspective of SLA Theories

  • 摘要: 针对书面纠正性反馈能否促进二语习得展开探讨。分析指出,书面纠正性反馈的有效性虽然不为基于普遍语法的二语习得理论和监控理论所支持,但却能得到包括语言可加工性理论、联结主义、信息加工模型、互动理论和社会文化理论在内的其他主流二语习得理论的认可。综合来看,书面纠正性反馈是值得肯定的,我们应对书面纠错无用论表示反对。

     

    Abstract: This paper probes into the issue of whether or not written corrective feedback facilitates second language acquisition (SLA). The analysis shows that the effectiveness of written corrective feedback, though not supported by Universal Grammar-based SLA theory and monitor theory, can be predicted within the framework of other mainstream SLA theories, including processability theory, connectionism, information processing models, interactionist approach and sociocultural theory. In general, we should give credit to written corrective feedback and oppose the polemic against this teaching practice.

     

/

返回文章
返回