康丕菊, 彭志远, 张晓强. “刘易斯转折点”之争:一个文献综述[J]. 云南农业大学学报(社会科学), 2014, 8(4): 22-28. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-390X(s).2014.04.005
引用本文: 康丕菊, 彭志远, 张晓强. “刘易斯转折点”之争:一个文献综述[J]. 云南农业大学学报(社会科学), 2014, 8(4): 22-28. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-390X(s).2014.04.005
KANG Piju, PENG Zhiyuan, ZHANG Xiaoqiang. A Literature Review on the Debate of “Lewis Turning Point” in China[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Social Science), 2014, 8(4): 22-28. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-390X(s).2014.04.005
Citation: KANG Piju, PENG Zhiyuan, ZHANG Xiaoqiang. A Literature Review on the Debate of “Lewis Turning Point” in China[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Social Science), 2014, 8(4): 22-28. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-390X(s).2014.04.005

“刘易斯转折点”之争:一个文献综述

A Literature Review on the Debate of “Lewis Turning Point” in China

  • 摘要: 刘易斯转折点之争是我国当前一个重要问题,各种观点差异的根本原因在于:一是刘易斯转折点本身存在第一转折点和第二转折点,二是判断方法上存在工资和边际生产力两种方法。刘易斯转折点 之争要回答的关键问题一是无限劳动力供给时代到底是否还存在,二是劳动力的进一步转移是否会带来农业生产危机。

     

    Abstract: At present, there has been a lot of debates among scholars about the theory of Lewis Turning Point in China. In all, the root causes for this are as follows: first, the two implications of the theory itself the first turning point and the second turning point; second, the two different judgment methods wages and marginal productivity. We should answer the two questions: one is whether the supply of labor is unlimited, the other is whether we have agricultural crisis with the further labor migration.

     

/

返回文章
返回