田逸飘, 刘明月, 廖望科. 乡村资源匮乏下入乡创业绩效的形成机制基于扎根理论的案例研究[J]. 云南农业大学学报(社会科学), 2024, 18(1): 62-69. DOI: 10.12371/j.ynau(s).202309027
引用本文: 田逸飘, 刘明月, 廖望科. 乡村资源匮乏下入乡创业绩效的形成机制基于扎根理论的案例研究[J]. 云南农业大学学报(社会科学), 2024, 18(1): 62-69. DOI: 10.12371/j.ynau(s).202309027
TIAN Yipiao, LIU Mingyue, LIAO Wangke. The Formation Mechanism of Entrepreneurial Performance in Rural Areas under the Scarcity of Rural Resources: A Case Study Based on Grounded Theory[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Social Science), 2024, 18(1): 62-69. DOI: 10.12371/j.ynau(s).202309027
Citation: TIAN Yipiao, LIU Mingyue, LIAO Wangke. The Formation Mechanism of Entrepreneurial Performance in Rural Areas under the Scarcity of Rural Resources: A Case Study Based on Grounded Theory[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Social Science), 2024, 18(1): 62-69. DOI: 10.12371/j.ynau(s).202309027

乡村资源匮乏下入乡创业绩效的形成机制基于扎根理论的案例研究

The Formation Mechanism of Entrepreneurial Performance in Rural Areas under the Scarcity of Rural Resources: A Case Study Based on Grounded Theory

  • 摘要: 入乡创业是充盈乡村“资源池”,丰富产业业态,实现产业兴旺的重要抓手。但在特殊的乡村环境下,创业资源匮乏与社会关系壁垒使入乡创业面临着诸多不确定性。本文基于扎根理论的单案例研究,深入分析乡村资源匮乏情境下入乡创业绩效的形成机制,以及正式制度环境与非正式制度环境的调节作用。研究发现:入乡创业者通过整合资金、信息与经验等创业资源,调整优化企业产品定位、生产经营模式和关键技术采用等战略选择,最终对创业绩效产生影响。在此过程中,以政策支持为表征的正式制度环境和以价值观念为表征的非正式制度环境通过“增减”机制发挥调节作用,即提升企业声誉,减少资源搜寻与投入成本,帮助企业控本增效。

     

    Abstract: Rural entrepreneurship is an important starting point for filling rural “resource pool” , enriching industrial form and realizing industrial revitalization. However, in the special rural environment, the lack of entrepreneurial resources and social barriers make rural entrepreneurship face many uncertainties. Based on the case study of grounded theory, this paper deeply analyzed the formation mechanism of entrepreneurial performance in rural areas under the context of resource scarcity, as well as the moderating effects of formal and informal institutional environments. The results showed that, through the integration of capital, information and experience, rural entrepreneurs adjusted and optimized the strategic choices of product positioning, production mode and key technologies, which ultimately affected entrepreneurial performance. In this process, the formal institutional environment characterized by policy support and the informal institutional environment characterized by values played a regulatory role through the “increase and decrease” mechanism, that is, to enhance corporate reputation, reduce resource search and input costs, and help enterprises control costs and increase efficiency.

     

/

返回文章
返回