谭淑娟, 刘婕, 赵鸭桥, 喜超. 云南县域特色农业发展指数评价与实证分析以云南省X县为例[J]. 云南农业大学学报(社会科学), 2024, 18(1): 75-83. DOI: 10.12371/j.ynau(s).202307055
引用本文: 谭淑娟, 刘婕, 赵鸭桥, 喜超. 云南县域特色农业发展指数评价与实证分析以云南省X县为例[J]. 云南农业大学学报(社会科学), 2024, 18(1): 75-83. DOI: 10.12371/j.ynau(s).202307055
TAN Shujuan, LIU Jie, ZHAO Yaqiao, XI Chao. Evaluation and Empirical Analysis on the Development Index of the Characteristic Agricultural in Yunnan County Level: Take X County in Yunnan Province as An Example[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Social Science), 2024, 18(1): 75-83. DOI: 10.12371/j.ynau(s).202307055
Citation: TAN Shujuan, LIU Jie, ZHAO Yaqiao, XI Chao. Evaluation and Empirical Analysis on the Development Index of the Characteristic Agricultural in Yunnan County Level: Take X County in Yunnan Province as An Example[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Social Science), 2024, 18(1): 75-83. DOI: 10.12371/j.ynau(s).202307055

云南县域特色农业发展指数评价与实证分析以云南省X县为例

Evaluation and Empirical Analysis on the Development Index of the Characteristic Agricultural in Yunnan County Level: Take X County in Yunnan Province as An Example

  • 摘要: 本文在解析特色农业概念与内涵的基础上,结合云南发展“三个经济”的重大部署,根据OSM指标体系构建原则形成云南县域特色农业发展指数评价指标体系,利用收集的X县2022年特色农业发展截面数据,通过专家打分方式获得模糊综合评价集,运用AHP进行权重测度,综合得出X县特色农业发展指数为74.879。分析X县各级指标得分,一级指标“园区经济”和“基础设施建设”对当地的特色农业发展贡献最大;“资源经济”和“口岸经济”评分均低于整体水平。在所有指标中,“资源经济”的“特色农产品认证”和“品牌影响力”两个指标和“口岸经济”的“口岸通达度”和“经济外向度”两个指标是制约当地特色农业发展的重要因素。最后根据X县特色农业发展现状提出4条建议:一是要充分挖掘本土农业资源,着力彰显特色农业显示度;二是要提升特色农业品牌建设水平;三是要着眼总部经济,提升经济外向度;四是要强化科技投入,不断提升科技支撑特色农业发展的力度。

     

    Abstract: On the basis of analyzing the concept and connotation of characteristic agriculture, this article combined the major deployment of Yunnan’ s development of the “Three Economies” , and formed an evaluation index system for the development of characteristic agriculture in Yunnan counties based on the principles of OSM index system construction. Using the collected cross-sectional data of X County’ s characteristic agriculture development in 2022, a fuzzy comprehensive evaluation set was obtained through expert scoring, and AHP was used for weight measurement, the comprehensive development index of characteristic agriculture in X County is 74.879. Analyzing the scores of indicators at all levels in X County, the first level indicators “park economy” and “infrastructure construction” had the greatest contribution to the development of local characteristic agriculture; The scores of “resource economy” and “port economy” were both lower than the overall level. Among all indicators, the two indicators of “resource economy” , “characteristic agricultural product certification” and “brand influence” , and the two indicators of “port economy” , “port accessibility” and “economic extroversion” , were important factors that constrain the development of local characteristic agriculture. At the end of the article, four suggestions were proposed based on the current development status of characteristic agriculture in X County: First, it was necessary to fully tap into local agricultural resources and focus on highlighting the display of characteristic agriculture. The second was to enhance the level of building distinctive agricultural brands. The third was to focus on the headquarters economy and enhance the degree of economic extroversion. Fourthly, we needed to strengthen investment in technology and continuously enhance the strength of technology support for the development of characteristic agriculture.

     

/

返回文章
返回