闫育满, 王梦宇. 乡村振兴背景下我国乡村治理绩效评价研究[J]. 云南农业大学学报(社会科学), 2022, 16(1): 46−51. doi: 10.12371/j.ynau(s).202104055
引用本文: 闫育满, 王梦宇. 乡村振兴背景下我国乡村治理绩效评价研究[J]. 云南农业大学学报(社会科学), 2022, 16(1): 46−51. doi: 10.12371/j.ynau(s).202104055
YAN Yuman, WANG Mengyu. Comprehensive Evaluation of Rural Governance Performance under the Rural Revitalization[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Social Science), 2022, 16(1): 46-51. DOI: 10.12371/j.ynau(s).202104055
Citation: YAN Yuman, WANG Mengyu. Comprehensive Evaluation of Rural Governance Performance under the Rural Revitalization[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Social Science), 2022, 16(1): 46-51. DOI: 10.12371/j.ynau(s).202104055

乡村振兴背景下我国乡村治理绩效评价研究

Comprehensive Evaluation of Rural Governance Performance under the Rural Revitalization

  • 摘要: 乡村治理是乡村振兴的重要内容和基础,研究我国乡村治理绩效的测度具有重要的理论与现实意义。分别从产业治理、生态治理、文明治理和生活治理四个维度构建指标体系测度我国乡村治理绩效,同时构建耦合协调模型对乡村治理各子系统间的耦合协调度及其演变规律进行分析。研究表明: 2014—2018年,我国乡村治理各子系统耦合协调度的变化可分为两个阶段:(1)2014—2015年,我国乡村治理各子系统的耦合协调度处于上升状态,但处于不协调阶段;(2)2016—2018年,我国乡村治理各子系统的耦合协调度持续提升、进入协调阶段,2018年已达到优质协调。基于上述研究结果提出对策建议,为今后的乡村治理绩效评估提供参考。

     

    Abstract: Rural governance is an important content and foundation of rural revitalization, so studying the measurement of rural governance performance has important theoretical and practical significance. The thesis constructs an index system to measure the performance of rural governance from four dimensions of industrial governance, ecological governance, civilized governance and life governance. At the same time, it constructs a coupling coordination model to analyze the degree of coupling coordination among the various subsystems of rural governance and its evolution law. Research shows that: From 2014 to 2018, the changes in the coupling and coordination of the various subsystems of rural governance can be divided into two phases: (1)From 2014 to 2015, the coupling and coordination of the various subsystems of rural governance in my country was on the rise, but at Inconsistency stage. (2)From 2016 to 2018, the degree of coupling and coordination of the various subsystems of rural governance in my country continued to improve and entered the coordination stage. In 2018, high-quality coordination has been reached. Finally, countermeasures and suggestions are put forward, which can provide references for future rural governance performance evaluation.

     

/

返回文章
返回