农村宅基地“三权分置”改革中资格权宜为成员权的妥适性

The Appropriateness of the Membership Right in the Reform of “Three Rights Separation ” of Rural Homestead

  • 摘要: 当今社会宅基地的社会保障功能慢慢弱化而经济价值日益凸显,传统宅基地使用权被诟病,正是因为没有将身份性与财产性相剥离,因此在“三权分置”改革背景下,形成资格权,重新进行权利构造设计具备合理性。2018年“中央一号文件”提出探索农村宅基地“三权分置”改革,但理论界对“资格权”的性质意见不一。目前主要观点为三种,分别为“剩余权说”“成员权说”“宅基地使用权说”。本文主要采用文献分析法,认为在资格权定性过程中,应当形成坚持集体土地公有制、促进城乡土地权利一体化、切实保障农民权利三个基本共识。以中央关于宅基地“三权分置”政策的丰富内涵为指导,综合实践理性反馈的证成路径,可以得出资格权属性应为“成员权”的结论。

     

    Abstract: In today’ s society, the social security function of homestead is gradually weakened and the economic value is increasingly prominent. The traditional homestead use right is criticized because it does not separate identity from property. Therefore, under the background of the “Three Rights Separation ” reform, it is reasonable to form the qualification right and re design the right structure. In 2018, “No.1 document of the Central Committee ” proposed to explore the “Three Rights Separation ” reform of rural homestead, but the theoretical circles have different opinions on the nature of “qualification right ” . At present, there are three main views, which are “surplus right theory ” , “member right theory ” and “homestead use right theory ” . This paper mainly adopts the method of literature analysis, and believes that in the process of qualification, three basic consensus should be formed, namely, adhere to collective land public ownership, promote the integration of urban and rural land rights, and effectively protect the rights of farmers. Under the guidance of the rich connotation of the central government’ s “Three Rights Separation ” policy of homestead and the comprehensive practice of rational feedback, it can be concluded that the attribute of qualification right should be “membership right ” .

     

/

返回文章
返回