政府补贴、寻租与农产品加工企业技术创新

Government Subsidies, Rent-seeking and Technological Innovation in Agricultural Processing Enterprises

  • 摘要: 从资源福利效应及资源诅咒效应两方面构建政府补贴、寻租与农产品加工企业技术创新间的理论基础,采用固定效应模型,探究了政府补贴对农产品加工企业技术创新的作用机制及其政府补贴失效的微观原因。研究发现:(1)农产品加工企业通过寻租活动能够建立政企关系并获得更多的政府补贴,但寻租活动对企业技术创新具有挤出效应,同时,政府补贴与农产品加工企业技术创新存在先抑制后促进的“U”型关系,即同时存在资源诅咒效应和资源福利效应,而企业寻租活动会加剧政府补贴的资源诅咒效应,不利于企业的技术创新的发展;(2)国有、职务犯罪高风险地区的农产品加工企业寻租活动抑制其技术创新水平的提高,非国有农产品加工企业的寻租活动对其技术创新水平的抑制作用显著强于国有农产品加工企业,但这一点在职务犯罪低风险地区并不显著。基于此,本文从提高农产品加工企业政府补贴的投入规模与力度、建立政府补贴事前与事后长效监管机制、持续推进党风廉政建设与反腐败斗争、提升企业管理水平与所在城市经济实力四个方面提出政策建议。

     

    Abstract: Based on the resource welfare effect and resource curse effect, the theoretical basis of the relationship between government subsidies, rent-seeking and technological innovation of agricultural processing enterprises was constructed. The fixed effect model was used to explore the mechanism of government subsidies on technological innovation of agricultural processing enterprises and the micro reasons for the failure of government subsidies.The results show: (1) Agricultural product processing enterprises can establish government-enterprise relationship and obtain more government subsidies, but rent-seeking activities of have a crowding out effect on technological innovation, There is a “U” -shaped relationship between government subsidies and technological innovation of agricultural product processing enterprises, which firstly inhibits and then promotes, so there are both resource curse effect and resource welfare effect. The rent-seeking activities of enterprises will intensify the resource curse effect of government subsidies, which is not conducive to the development of technological innovation of enterprises. (2) The rent-seeking activities of agricultural products processing enterprises in state-owned and high-risk duty crime areas inhibit the improvement of their technological innovation level, and the rent-seeking activities of non-state-owned agricultural products processing enterprises have a significantly stronger inhibitory effect on the improvement of their technological innovation level, but this is not significant in low-risk duty crime areas. Based on this, this paper puts forward policy suggestions from four aspects: improving the investment scale and intensity of government subsidies for agricultural product processing enterprises, establishing a long-term supervision mechanism before and after government subsidies, continuously promoting the construction of party conduct and clean government and the fight against corruption, improving the management level of enterprises and the economic strength of cities.

     

/

返回文章
返回