小农户参与农业全产业链增值收益的选择偏好及其异质性分析

Small Farmholders’ Preference for Participating in the Value-added Benefits of the Holistic Agricultural Industry Chain and Its Heterogeneity Analysis

  • 摘要: 随着农业现代化进程加快,探究小农户如何通过参与农业全产业链实现收益增值成为重要课题。立足甘肃省小农户实际,本文从行为偏好视角出发,构建农户参与路径、利益联结机制、服务供给和政策支持四大属性框架。基于对甘肃省14个市州自然村300份问卷数据的调查,运用多项Logit模型对其参与偏好及偏好异质性进行实证分析。研究结果表明:第一,小农户普遍偏好通过“农户+合作社”模式参与农业全产业链,倾向选择订单合约等稳定联结机制,对覆盖技术信息、农资物流与资金服务的综合服务有较强需求,政策性金融支持成为其首选政策工具。第二,性别、年龄、教育水平、收入水平等因素显著影响其参与方式的选择,表现出强烈的个体异质性。第三,在增值收益方面,合作社参与、订单合约、金融支持及综合服务均显著提高收益水平,而龙头企业参与对农户收益增值具有负向影响。研究结果为完善农业全产业链政策设计、提升小农户组织化水平及推动现代农业体系建设提供了理论与实践依据。

     

    Abstract: With the acceleration of agricultural modernization, it has become an important topic to explore how small farmholders can realize the value-added of income by participating in the holistic agricultural industry chain. Based on the actual situation of small farmholders in Gansu Province, this paper constructed four attribute frameworks from the perspective of behavioral preference: farmer participation path, interest linkage mechanism, service supply and policy support. Based on the survey of 300 questionnaire data from 14 cities and prefectures, the participation preference and preference heterogeneity were empirically analyzed by using multiple Logit models. The results showed that: Firstly, small farmholders generally prefered to participate in the holistic agricultural industry chain through the “farmer cooperative” model, tended to choose stable linkage mechanisms such as order contracts, and had a strong demand for comprehensive services covering technical information, agricultural logistics and capital services, and policy-based financial support had become their preferred policy tool. Secondly, factors such as gender, age, education level, and income level significantly affected the choice of participation methods, showing strong individual heterogeneity. Thirdly, in terms of value-added income, cooperative participation, order contracts, financial support and comprehensive services had significantly increased the income level, while the participation of leading enterprises had a negative impact on the income appreciation of rural households. The results of this study provided a theoretical and practical basis for improving the policy design of the whole agricultural industry chain, improving the organizational level of small farmholders, and promoting the construction of modern agricultural system.

     

/

返回文章
返回