乡村振兴背景下乡村ESG发展水平的统计测度及其影响因素研究

Research on Statistical Measurement of Rural ESG Development Level and Its Influencing Factors in the Context of Rural Revitalization

  • 摘要: 在乡村振兴背景下,为探究我国乡村振兴可持续发展能力,本文借鉴ESG理念,采用熵权法、Dagum基尼系数法、空间杜宾模型等多种方法对中国2007—2021年30个省区市的乡村ESG(环境、社会和治理)综合发展水平、区域差异、空间关联及影响因素进行探究。研究发现考察期内,中国乡村ESG综合发展水平整体上升,但各省区市发展不平衡,东部、中部和西部地区呈现出“东高、中快、西低”的趋势,区域差异总体基尼系数呈现明显下降趋势;东部和西部地区内部差异变化较为相似,而中部地区内部差异变化更为复杂;区域间差异变化上,东—中与东—西部地区间的差距逐年扩大,但中—西部地区区域间差异变化波动幅度小。此外,乡村绿地覆盖率、乡镇文化站、太阳能热水器、产业结构高级化等因素对乡村ESG发展有正面影响,且部分因素对邻近省区市存在正面溢出效应。因此,为提高乡村整体ESG发展水平、缩小各区域发展差异,需要注重区域协同发展,加大环境保护力度,推动产业结构高级化,增强文化与数字化基础设施建设。

     

    Abstract: Under the background of rural revitalization, this paper explored the sustainable development capacity of China’ s rural revitalization by drawing on ESG concepts. It adopted methods such as the entropy weight method, Dagum’ s Gini coefficient method, and the spatial Durbin model to investigate the comprehensive development level of rural ESG (Environment, Society, and Governance), regional differences, spatial correlation, as well as nd influencing factors across 30 provincial-level regions in China from 2007 to 2021. The study revealed that during the investigation period, the comprehensive development level of rural ESG in China had shown an overall increase; however, the development across provinces and regions remained unbalanced, displaying a trend of “high in the east, fast in the center, and low in the west” . The overall Gini coefficient of regional disparity had exhibited a clear downward trend. The changes in internal disparities in the eastern and western regions were relatively similar, while the internal disparities in the central region were more complex. In terms of interregional disparities, the gap between the East-Central and East-West regions had widened year by year, whereas changes in the interregional disparities between the Central-West region had been less volatile. The internal differences between the eastern and western regions were similar, while the internal differences within the central region were more complex. The differences between the regions showed a trend characterized by expanding in the east, stabilizing in the middle, and stabilizing in the west. Furthermore, the study found that, factors such as rural green space coverage, township cultural stations, solar water heaters, and an advanced industrial structure positively impacted the development of rural ESG. Some of these factors also exhibited positive spillover effects on neighboring provincial-level regions. Therefore, to enhance the overall ESG development level of rural areas and narrow regional development disparities, it is essential to prioritize regional collaborative development, intensify environmental protection efforts, promote the upgrading of industrial structures, and strengthen the construction of cultural and digital infrastructure.

     

/

返回文章
返回