农户跨期农业技术采纳行为的影响因素研究以秸秆还田技术为例

Research on Influencing Factors of Farmers’ Inter-temporal Agricultural Technology Adoption Behavior: An Example of Straw Returning Technology

  • 摘要: 具有跨期属性的秸秆还田技术是我国推进农业绿色发展的重要举措。将影响农户秸秆还田技术采纳行为的农户内部因素、联结因素和外部因素纳入同一分析框架,基于甘肃省中东部地区245户农户调研数据,首先采用Logistic模型确定影响秸秆还田技术采纳行为的主要影响因素,然后采用ISM模型对各影响因素的逻辑关联与层级结构进行深入分析。研究表明:(1)农户秸秆还田技术采纳行为影响因素分析框架中有18个变量对农户采纳行为具有显著影响;(2)户主年龄、受教育程度、是否位于示范区和是否参与技术培训是深层根源因素;信息获取能力、是否加入合作社、经营规模、政府秸秆禁烧和补贴政策是中层间接因素;农户技术认知水平、兼业化水平、家庭人均年收入和地权期限是表层直接因素。基于此,从积极培养新型职业农民、完善农业技术推广体系、稳定土地经营权、拓宽农户信息采集渠道、大力发展“三品一标”农产品等方面提出对策建议。

     

    Abstract: Straw returning technology with intertemporal attributes is an important measure to promote the green development of agriculture areas in China. The internal factors, connecting factors and external factors that affect the adoption behavior of farmers’ straw returning technology were incorporated into the same analysis framework. Based on the survey data of 245 farmers in the central and eastern part of Gansu Province, the logistic model was used to determine the factors affecting the adoption behavior of straw returning technology. The main influencing factors, and then the ISM model was used to deeply analyze the logical relationship and hierarchical structure of each influencing factor. The research showed that: (1) There were 18 variables in the analysis framework of farmers’ straw returning technology adoption behavior influencing factors that had a significant impact on farmers’ adoption behavior; (2) The age of the head of the household, education level, whether it was located in the demonstration area, and whether to participate in technical training were important factors. The underlying root factors; the ability to obtain information, whether to join the cooperative, the scale of operation, the government’ s straw burning ban and subsidy policies were the indirect factors at the middle level; the level of farmers’ technical cognition, the level of part-time jobs, the per capita annual income of the family and the duration of land rights were the direct factors at the surface. Based on this, countermeasures and suggestions were put forward in terms of actively cultivating new professional farmers, improving agricultural technology extension system, stabilizing land management rights, expanding farmers’ information collection channels, and vigorously developing “three products and one standard” agricultural products.

     

/

返回文章
返回