宋孜涵, 贾曼莉. 新质生产力助力乡村振兴:理论机制与实证检验[J]. 云南农业大学学报(社会科学), 2024, 18(4): 10−17. DOI: 10.12371/j.ynau(s).202403171
引用本文: 宋孜涵, 贾曼莉. 新质生产力助力乡村振兴:理论机制与实证检验[J]. 云南农业大学学报(社会科学), 2024, 18(4): 10−17. DOI: 10.12371/j.ynau(s).202403171
SONG Zihan, JIA Manli. New Quality Productivity Empowers Rural Revitalization: Theoretical Mechanisms and Empirical Verification[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Social Science), 2024, 18(4): 10-17. DOI: 10.12371/j.ynau(s).202403171
Citation: SONG Zihan, JIA Manli. New Quality Productivity Empowers Rural Revitalization: Theoretical Mechanisms and Empirical Verification[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Social Science), 2024, 18(4): 10-17. DOI: 10.12371/j.ynau(s).202403171

新质生产力助力乡村振兴:理论机制与实证检验

New Quality Productivity Empowers Rural Revitalization: Theoretical Mechanisms and Empirical Verification

  • 摘要: 新质生产力为我国乡村振兴发展带来新的机遇与挑战,研究新质生产力对乡村振兴的影响,可为我国建设农业强国提供理论与实证支撑。基于2010—2022年中国31个省份的面板数据,采用双向固定效应、空间效应等模型实证分析新质生产力对乡村振兴的影响机制。研究发现:政府支农力度能够显著地强化新质生产力对乡村振兴的促进效果。新质生产力在赋能乡村振兴的过程中表现出明显的异质性,这种异质性在科技创新水平的维度上尤为明显,即在科技创新水平较高的地区,新质生产力对乡村振兴的正向影响更加显著。从区域异质性的角度来看,西部地区新质生产力对乡村振兴的正向促进作用更加突出。此外,经济发展水平对于新质生产力推动乡村振兴的影响表现为单门槛效应,但省域新质生产力发展对附近省域乡村振兴发展存在虹吸效应。

     

    Abstract: New quality productivity bring new opportunities and challenges for the revitalization and development of rural areas in our country. Studying the impact of these new modes of productivity on rural revitalization can provide theoretical and empirical support for China’ s efforts to build an agricultural powerhouse. Based on panel data from 31 provinces in China from 2010 to 2022, this study empirically analysed the impact mechanism of the new quality productivity on rural revitalization through bidirectional fixed effects and spatial effects models. The study found that, government support for agriculture could significantly enhance the positive impact of new modes of productivity on rural revitalization. New quality productivity showed obvious heterogeneity in the process of empowering rural revitalization, particularly in terms of technological innovation. That was, in areas with higher levels of technological innovation, the positive impact of new quality productivity on rural revitalization was more significant. From a regional heterogeneity perspective, the positive promotional effect of new quality productivity on rural revitalization was more prominent in western regions. In addition, the impact of economic development levels on the role of new quality productivity in promoting rural revitalization demonstrated a single-threshold effect, but the development of provincial new quality productivity had a siphon effect on the development of rural revitalization in nearby provinces.

     

/

返回文章
返回