洱海流域生态文化综合发展水平评价

Evaluation of the Comprehensive Development Level of Ecological Culture in the Erhai Lake Basin

  • 摘要: 洱海流域生态类型丰富多样,民族、生态和信仰多元共生,呈现出苍洱生态系统与本土文化耦合的生态文化内涵。当前洱海流域生态保护任务艰巨,民族传统文化的保护和发展也面临冲击。为给洱海流域高质量发展提供科学决策依据,本研究构建乡镇尺度生态与文化并重的生态文化评价体系。结果表明:洱海流域喜洲镇、凤羽镇、挖色镇的生态文化综合指数D值均在0.5以上,是流域内生态文化综合发展最好的区域。邓川镇的生态文化综合指数D值较低,为0.26。文化子系统和生态子系统发展较好区域相交于洱海,最终形成了以凤羽镇—喜洲镇—挖色镇为核心轴,辐射洱海流域的生态文化发展空间格局。流域内各乡镇生态与文化子系统耦合协调情况均在中度失调和轻度失调水平。据此将洱海流域划分成四大发展类型区:生态文化协同保护区、生态文化协同发展区、生态保护优先区、文化发展优先区,并提出了具体的发展建议。

     

    Abstract: There are rich and diverse ecological types in Erhai Lake Basin, diverse ethnic, ecological, and religious coexist, which present the ecological and cultural connotations of the coupling between the Cang’er ecosystem and local culture. The current task of ecological protection in the Erhai Lake Basin is arduous, and the protection and development of traditional ethnic culture are also facing challenges. To provide scientific decision-making basis for the high-quality development of the Erhai River Basin, this paper established an ecological and cultural evaluation system that emphasized both ecology and culture at the township level. This study found that: The ecological and cultural comprehensive index D values of Xizhou Town, Fengyu Town, and Wase Town in the Erhai Lake Basin were all above 0.5, making them the regions with the best ecological and cultural comprehensive development in the basin. The ecological and cultural comprehensive index D value of Dengchuan Town was relatively low, at 0.26. The well-developed areas of the cultural and ecological subsystems intersected with the Erhai Lake, ultimately forming a spatial pattern of ecological and cultural development radiating from the Erhai Lake Basin with Fengyu Town, Xizhou Town, and Wase Town as the core axis.The coupling and coordination of ecological and cultural subsystems in various townships within the basin were at moderate and mild levels of imbalance. Based on this, the Erhai Lake Basin was divided into four major development types: ecological and cultural collaborative protection zone, ecological and cultural collaborative development zone, ecological protection priority zone, and cultural development priority zone, and specific development suggestions are proposed.

     

/

返回文章
返回