• Chinese Science Citation Database (CSCD) Source Journals
  • A Guide to the Core Journals of China
  • Top 100 Sci-Tech Journals of Chinese Universities
  • Chinese Science and Technical Core Journals
  • China Agriculture and Forestry Core Journals (Category A)
WANG Ruixue, TANG Li, XU Zhi, et al. Analysis of Main Soil Factors Limiting Vegetables Production under Greenhouse in Jinning County[J]. JOURNAL OF YUNNAN AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY(Natural Science), 2017, 32(1): 140-145. DOI: 10.16211/j.issn.1004-390X(n).2017.01.021
Citation: WANG Ruixue, TANG Li, XU Zhi, et al. Analysis of Main Soil Factors Limiting Vegetables Production under Greenhouse in Jinning County[J]. JOURNAL OF YUNNAN AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY(Natural Science), 2017, 32(1): 140-145. DOI: 10.16211/j.issn.1004-390X(n).2017.01.021

Analysis of Main Soil Factors Limiting Vegetables Production under Greenhouse in Jinning County

More Information
  • Received Date: December 13, 2015
  • Revised Date: March 07, 2016
  • Published Date: January 29, 2017
  • Five years planted soil was used to find the main factors limiting greenhouse vegetable production in the method of wild investigating combined with chemical analysis and mathematical statistics in Jinning County, Yunnan Province.The distribution of greenhouse vegetable soil nutrients, pH, EC, CEC in different soil layers(0~10 cm, 10~20 cm and 20~30 cm) and the relationship between these factors and vegetable yield were studied, the main soil factors limiting vegetable yields were found out. The results suggested that:(1) Distribution of soil nutrient content was significantly vertical and accumulation in 0~10 cm lever. Soil acidification and secondary salinization were mainly concentrated in 0~20 cm soil layer. (2) Soil pH was positively correlated with vegetable yield (n=39,r=0.462**)while EC had negative relationship with crop yield (n=39,r=-0.448**). Soil pH and EC were the most limiting factors in vegetable production. (3) Nitrogen fertilizer inputs significantly correlated with soil EC (n=39, r=0.802**) and soil acidification (n=39,r=-0.759**), and increased amounts of nitrogen inputs significantly speed up the process of soil acidification and secondary salinization.In order to reduce the risk of soil acidification and secondary salinization under plastic tunnel and improve the production, we suggested that decrease fertilizer inputs (particularly nitrogen) while increasing organic fertilizer application in this region. Aimed to provide a reference basis of scientific nutrient managements and promoting sustainable development of facilities vegetable soil and production.
  • [1] 郭世荣, 孙锦, 束胜, 等. 我国设施园艺概况及发展趋势[J]. 中国蔬菜, 2012(18):1.
    [2] [2] 冯永军, 陈为峰, 张蕾娜, 等. 设施园艺土壤的盐化与治理对策[J].农业工程学报,2001,17(2):111.
    [3] [3] GUO J H, LIU X J, ZHANG Y, et al. Significant acidification in major Chinese crop lands[J]. Science, 2010, 327(5968):1008. DOI: 10.1126/science.1182570.
    [4] [4] SHEN W S, LIN X G, SHI W M, et al. Higher rates of nitrogen fertilization decrease soil enzyme activities, microbial functional diversity and nitrification capacity in a Chinese polytunnel greenhouse vegetable land[J]. Plant and Soil, 2010, 337(1):137. DOI 10.1007/s11104-010-0511-2.
    [5] [5] QIU S J, JU X T, INGWERSEN J, et al. Changes in soil carbon and nitrogen pools after shifting from conventional cereal to greenhouse vegetable production[J]. Soil and Tillage Research,2010, 107(2):80. DOI 10.1007/s11104-010-0712-8.
    [6] [6] 张昌爱, 劳秀荣. 保护地土壤模拟酸化对油菜根系的影响[J]. 耕作与栽培,2003(1):48.DOI: 10.13605/j.cnki.52-1065/s.2003.01.027.
    [7] [7] 郭文忠, 王学梅, 李丁仁, 等. 保护地土壤次生盐渍化对茼蒿生长发育和硝酸盐积累的影响[J]. 陕西农业科学, 2003(2):3.
    [8] [8] 张金锦, 段增强. 设施菜地土壤次生盐渍化的成因、危害及其分类与分级标准的研究进展[J].土壤, 2011, 43(3):361.DOI: 10.13758/j.cnki.tr.2011.03.003.
    [9] [9] 范庆锋, 张玉龙, 陈重. 保护地蔬菜栽培对土壤盐分积累及pH值的影响[J]. 水土保持学报,2009, 23(1):103. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2009.01.037.
    [10] [10] 包立, 张乃明, 农明英. 滇池东大河流域土壤磷素累积规律及空间分布特征研究[J].土壤, 2014, 46(3):470. DOI: 10.13758/J.cnki.tr.2014.03.014.
    [11] [11] 张乃明, 李成学, 李阳红. 滇池流域土壤磷累积特征与释放风险研究[J].土壤,2007, 39(4):665. DOI: 10.13758/j.cnki.tr.2007.04.033.
    [12] [12] 鲁如坤. 土壤农业化学分析方法[M]. 北京:中国农业科技出版社, 1999:156.
    [13] [13] 刘凤淮, 文廷刚, 杜小凤, 等. 蔬菜连作障碍因子分析及其防治措施[J]. 江西农业学报, 2008, 20(5):41.
    [14] [14] 杜新民, 吴忠红, 张永清, 等. 不同种植年限日光温室土壤盐分和养分变化研究[J].水土保持学报,2007, 21(2):78. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2007.02.020.
    [15] [15] 曾路生, 崔德杰, 李俊良, 等. 寿光大棚设施菜地土壤呼吸强度、酶活性、pH与EC的变化研究[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2009, 15(4):865.
    [16] [16] 王嫒华, 段增强, 赵宇, 等. 积盐条件下土壤酸化过程的特异性研究[J]. 土壤学报, 2015, 52(1):228.
    [17] [17] 曾路生, 高岩, 李俊良, 等. 寿光大棚菜地酸化与土壤养分变化关系研究[J].水土保持学报,2010, 24(4):157. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2010.04.045.
    [18] [18] 沈灵凤, 白玲玉, 曾希柏, 等.施肥对设施菜地土壤硝态氮累积及pH的影响[J].农业环境科学学报, 2012, 31(7):1350.
    [19] [19] JU X T, KOU C L, ZHANG F S, et al. Nitrogen balance and ground water nitrate contamination:comparison among three intensive cropping systems on the north China Plain[J].Environmental Pollution,2006,143(1):117. DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2005.11.005.
    [20] [20] SHI W M, YAO J, YAN F. Vegetable cultivation under greenhouse conditions leads to rapid accumulation of nutrients, acidification and salinity of soils and groundwater contamination in South-Eastern China[J].Nutrition Cycle in Agroecosystems,2009, 83(1):73.DOI: 10.1007/s10705-008-9201-3.
    [21] [21] 雷宝坤, 张维理, 段宗颜, 等. 滇池流域设施条件下生菜氮磷减控研究[J]. 西南农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2005,27(1):55.DOI: 10.13718/j.cnki.xdzk.2005.01.013.
    [22] [22] 钱晓雍, 沈根祥, 郭春霞, 等. 不同废弃物对设施菜地次生盐渍化土壤的修复效果[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2014, 33(4):737.
    [23] [23] 黄东风, 王果, 李卫华, 等. 不同施肥模式对蔬菜生长、氮肥利用及菜地氮流失的影响[J].应用生态报,2009,20(3):631.DOI: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.2009.0099.
    [24] [24] 范庆锋, 虞娜, 张玉玲, 等. 设施蔬菜栽培对土壤阳离子交换性能的影响[J]. 土壤学报, 2014, 51(5):1132.
  • Related Articles

    [1]LI Mingmin, WANG Junsong, HE Xian, BAO Zhimi, YANG Shuntao, KONG Yan, FENG Haitao, TANG Cheng. Analysis of Pollution Sources in Erhai Lake Based on Principal Component Analysis and Positive Matrix Factorization[J]. JOURNAL OF YUNNAN AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY(Natural Science). DOI: 10.12101/j.issn.1004-390X(n).202405028
    [2]TIAN Shihan, DENG Yishu, BAO Li, LI Jiarong, SU Youbo, ZHANG Naiming, XIA Yunsheng. Spatial Variability Characteristics and Evaluation of Soil Fertility in the Main Winter-early Vegetable Production Areas of Yuanmou, Yunnan[J]. JOURNAL OF YUNNAN AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY(Natural Science), 2024, 39(4): 149-158. DOI: 10.12101/j.issn.1004-390X(n).202306029
    [3]WANG Haixiang, DU Chunjiang, WEI Qin, HOU Ying, XU Juan, YANG Meng, LIU Xiangyi, SU Weigeng. Study on the Suitable Harvest Period of Gastrodia elata Bl. in Tonghai Based on Principal Component Analysis[J]. JOURNAL OF YUNNAN AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY(Natural Science), 2024, 39(2): 101-107. DOI: 10.12101/j.issn.1004-390X(n).202310027
    [4]Yanhui GUO, Yi YANG, Zhiquan YANG, Zhijun KONG. Fuzzy Comprehensive Analysis on the Slope Stability of Jinjiang Farmland Irrigation Canal[J]. JOURNAL OF YUNNAN AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY(Natural Science), 2021, 36(5): 905-911. DOI: 10.12101/j.issn.1004-390X(n).202008066
    [5]Qianchao WANG, Zhiyou KONG, Junna LIU, Xiuju HUAN, Ping ZHANG, Yongjiang LIU, Li LI, Peng QIN. Analysis and Evaluation of the Genetic Characteristics of Main Nutrients and Antioxidant Components in Quinoa Seeds[J]. JOURNAL OF YUNNAN AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY(Natural Science), 2020, 35(6): 931-937. DOI: 10.12101/j.issn.1004-390X(n).202002034
    [6]Jiahong YUAN, Zhengjie LIU, Huilin WU, Zichao MAO, Chun LIN. The Analysis of the Main Agronomic Traits of 111 Quinoa Germplasm Resources[J]. JOURNAL OF YUNNAN AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY(Natural Science), 2020, 35(4): 572-580, 650. DOI: 10.12101/j.issn.1004-390X(n).201904041
    [7]Yao ZOU, Yan XU, Shengxiang CHEN, Liqiang TAN, Qian TANG. Evaluation of Photosynthetic Performance in 25 Tea Cultivars Based on the Analysis of Factor and Cluster[J]. JOURNAL OF YUNNAN AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY(Natural Science), 2019, 34(1): 89-96. DOI: 10.12101/j.issn.1004-390X(n).201709015
    [8]Jing LIU, Jiacheng ZHAO, Hui GAO, Yikun HUA, Jiefei QIU, Wen ZHANG, Ruijie WENG, Ruijun DENG, Hui WANG. Change of the Volatile Aroma Components of Cut Tobacco in Different Cutting Widths in Drying Process[J]. JOURNAL OF YUNNAN AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY(Natural Science), 2018, 33(1): 79-89. DOI: 10.12101/j.issn.1004-390X(n).201608031
    [9]ZHAO Jiacheng, GAO Hui, WANG Hui, LIU Jing, WANG Yuzhen, LIN Hongjia, CUI Yuxiang, HUA Yikun. Effects of Cutting Width of Tobacco on Cut Tobacco Structure and its Distribution Stability[J]. JOURNAL OF YUNNAN AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY(Natural Science), 2017, 32(4): 668-677. DOI: 10.16211/j.issn.1004-390X(n).2017.04.015
    [10]ZHANG Shiying, ZHANG Naiming, WANG Jin. Soil Microbial Community of Vineyard with Different Planting Years and Correlation Analysis with Fertility Factors[J]. JOURNAL OF YUNNAN AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY(Natural Science), 2015, 30(1): 101-106. DOI: 10.16211/j.issn.1004-390X(n).2015.01.017
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(11)

    1. 杨立强,丁宁,赵淑国,李斌,齐萌,宋立松,杨绍鑫,李哲. 基于烟支物理指标的分析方法应用. 农产品加工. 2024(01): 98-102 .
    2. 武云杰,刘欢,王瑞珍,王浩宇,孙觅,郑聪,吴剑平,周建军,田斌强,李春光. 烟丝加工过程中的破碎规律研究. 河南农业科学. 2024(02): 162-170 .
    3. 王瑞珍,李春光,孙觅,李全胜,田斌强,姬会福,王欢欢,武云杰. 含水率和温度对烟丝破碎规律的影响. 中南农业科技. 2023(06): 118-124 .
    4. 刘洪坤,邓国栋,李斌,周博,赵继俊,陈志浩,朱文魁. 基于变径圆的烟丝宽度图像检测方法. 烟草科技. 2022(02): 77-83 .
    5. 郭华诚,吴艳艳,张峻松,朱远洋,郜海民,邹严颉,李瑞丽. 切丝宽度对细支烟卷制质量、主流烟气及感官质量的影响. 食品与机械. 2021(02): 194-198 .
    6. 任发军,胡发志,郭春晖,张康伟,黄刚. 不同规格卷烟物质指标影响因素研究进展. 湖南文理学院学报(自然科学版). 2021(04): 83-87 .
    7. 高桂园. 影响卷烟物理指标的研究进展. 中外企业家. 2020(04): 235 .
    8. 李晓玲. 切丝宽度对细支卷烟质量的影响. 甘肃科技. 2020(07): 9-10 .
    9. 李旭,崔晓梦,彭钰涵,焦凯旋,樊虎,沈凯,边腾飞,潘凡达. 切丝宽度对卷烟品质影响的研究进展. 农产品加工. 2020(22): 74-76 .
    10. 楚晗,范磊,王爱霞,王天怡,李劲锋,李晓,姚二民. 不同规格卷烟烟丝结构与物理质量的差异性研究. 南方农业学报. 2019(07): 1565-1571 .
    11. 王天怡,高尊华,范磊,楚晗,李静浩,李晓,姚二民. 基于灰色关联法的短支烟烟丝结构优化研究. 食品与机械. 2019(07): 210-214 .

    Other cited types(0)

Catalog

    Article views (1914) PDF downloads (407) Cited by(11)