The Effect of Adding Chitosan in Feed on Growth Performance and Slaughter Performance of Peking Duck

JIAO Deling; ZENG Luyao; YANG Di; YANG Li; HUANG Yong; CONG Li; WEI Hongjiang; PAN Weirong

doi:10.16211/j.issn.1004-390X(n).2016.03.006

JOURNAL OF YUNNAN AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY（Natural Science） > 2016 > 31(3): 410-415. > DOI: 10.16211/j.issn.1004-390X(n).2016.03.006

JIAO Deling, ZENG Luyao, YANG Di, et al. The Effect of Adding Chitosan in Feed on Growth Performance and Slaughter Performance of Peking Duck[J]. JOURNAL OF YUNNAN AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY（Natural Science）, 2016, 31(3): 410-415. DOI: 10.16211/j.issn.1004-390X(n).2016.03.006

Citation:

PDF (860 KB)

The Effect of Adding Chitosan in Feed on Growth Performance and Slaughter Performance of Peking Duck

1.
Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed of Yunnan Province, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming 650201, China
2.
College of Animal Science and Technology, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming 650201, China
3.
Nanjing Zhuokang Biological Technology Co., Ltd., Nanjing 211101, China

More Information

Received Date: September 06, 2015
Revised Date: November 24, 2015
Published Date: May 29, 2016

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

In this study the growth and slaughter performance of Peking Ducks was investigated by adding different proportions of chitosan in feed. Eight hundred 10-day-old Peking Ducks were selected and randomly divided into four groups. Each group was divided into four replicates, and each repeated group had 50 of the 10-day-old Peking Ducks (half male and half female). The experimental groups were fed with the basic diet added with 0.5%, 1.0% and 2.0% of chitosan, and without any antibiotic. The control groups were fed with the basic diet added by 0.02% zinc bacitracin polypeptide antibiotics. Free food, drinking water, natural light and cage were used in the whole experiment. The added chitosan and antibiotic effect were compared through detecting the body weight, feed intake, feed meat ratio, survival ratio and slaughtering performance of Peking ducks. Thus, the appropriate proportion of chitosan in feed was screened out. The experimental results were as follows: there was no significant difference in body weight between the experimental groups and the control group (P0.05), while compared with the experimental group, the ratio of feed to meat was significantly higher than that of the control group (P0.05). However, the survival rate of the control group was lower than those of the experimental groups and the control group had significant improvement on feed efficiency (P0.05). On the slaughter ratio, half eviscerated ratio, eviscerated ratio and chest ratio, there were no significant difference among the groups (P0.05). The luminance value, red value and yellow value also were not significantly different (P0.05), and there was no obvious difference on the surface of the meat sensory quality. These findings suggest that the addition of chitosan in feed can also obtain the similar effect as antibiotics in feed on the growth performance and slaughter performance. Among them, the effect of adding 1.0% chitosan in feed is relatively good, which can be used as an alternative to addition of antibiotics in feed. This study provides a theoretical basis for the feed adding with chitosan instead of antibiotics.
- chitosan,
- antibiotics,
- Peking Duck,
- growth performance,
- slaughter performance

FullText(HTML)

References (18)

References

[1]	侯春林,卢建照,包聚良,等.几丁质生物学特性研究[J].中国修复重建外科杂志,1993,7(2):115.
[2]	[2] 王文斌,顾其胜,吴萍.透明质酸钠:一种新型的防止术后组织粘连的高分子可吸收生物医学材料[J].透析与人工器官,1997,8(1):4.
[3]	[3] 伍喜林,杨凤.饲用抗生素抗菌药物的合理应用[J].饲料工业,2001,22(11):20.
[4]	[4] STARR M P, REYNOLDS D M. Streptomycin resistance of coliform bacteria from turkeys fed streptomycin[J]. American Journal of Public Health, 1951, 4(1): 1375.
[5]	[5] BARNES E M. The effect of antibiotic supplements on the faecal streptococci (Lancefield group D)of poultry[J]. The British Veterinary Journal, 1958, 114: 333.
[6]	[6] ELLIOT S D. BARNES E M. Changes in serological type and antibiotic resistance of Lancefield group D streptococci in chickens receiving dietary chlortetracycline[J]. Journal of General Microbiology, 1959, 20(2): 426.
[7]	[7] 李凯年.抗生素生长促进剂的历史、作用及发展趋势[J].畜牧兽医科技信息,2005(10):7.
[8]	[8] 盛志坚,侯春林.几丁糖抑制细菌生长的实验研究[J].中国修复重建外科杂志,1994,8(2):81.
[9]	[9] CHEN C S, LIAU W Y, TSAI G J. Antibacterial effects of N-sulfonated and N-sulfobenzoyl chitosan and application to oyster preservation[J].Journal of Food Protection, 1998, 61(9): 1124.
[10]	[10] 中华人民共和国卫生部.保健食品检验与评价技术规范[S],2003.
[11]	[11] 朱景瑞.家禽学实验指导[M].上海:上海科学技术出版社,1963.
[12]	[12] 贾汝敏,王润莲,杨茂东.碳酸氢钠对高温下珍珠鸡生产性能及血液pH值的影响[J].湛江海洋大学学报,1999,19(2):63.
[13]	[13] 杨燕军,陈有亮.颜色的仪器测定法及其在肉色测定中的应用[J].肉类工业,2004(1):43.
[14]	[14] 刘志恒,李学荣,孙军德,等.几丁聚糖在农业上应用的研究进展[J].沈阳农业大学学报,2001,32(6):459.
[15]	[15] 卞雅娜,刘殿祥.壳聚糖的研究进展[J].职业与健康,2002,18(1):44.
[16]	[16] 蒋挺大.甲壳素[M].北京:化学工业出版社,2003:50.
[17]	[17] LESSON S, SUMMERS J D, PROULX J. Production and carcass characteristics of the duck[J].Poultry Science,1982,61:2456.
[18]	[18] 张伟力.季节和屠宰日对商品猪胴体和肉质性状的影响[J].中国畜牧杂志,1995,31(6):12.

[1]	Fenglei DING, Le ZHANG, Lei YU, Hejuan WANG, Lili ZHANG, Xiaoxiao LI, He SONG, Zhaorong DONG. Differences in Nitrogen Accumulation and Root Zone Soil Nitrogen Transformation in Different Maize Genotypes[J]. JOURNAL OF YUNNAN AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY（Natural Science）, 2022, 37(6): 1004-1013. DOI: 10.12101/j.issn.1004-390X(n).202111072
[2]	Fupeng MEI, Zhiyuan HUANG, Jiaxiang WU, Mengzhuang CUN, Guiru ZHAO, Shihua LI, Wangfu YANG, Shuhui ZI. Effects of Nitrogen Reduction on Intercropping Advantage of Maize and Aconitum vilmorinianum[J]. JOURNAL OF YUNNAN AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY（Natural Science）, 2022, 37(5): 890-896. DOI: 10.12101/j.issn.1004-390X(n).202111008
[3]	Yunling CUI, Liqin ZHANG. Effect of SODmN Reduction Application on the Yield, Profit and Nutrient Utilization of Spring Maize in Hexi Oasis Irrigation Area[J]. JOURNAL OF YUNNAN AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY（Natural Science）, 2021, 36(2): 353-358. DOI: 10.12101/j.issn.1004-390X(n).201907056
[4]	Zhiying GAO, Zhaopei ZHANG, Lei FAN, Yonghui YANG. Effects of Light Intensity and Nitrogen Level on the Growth, Photosynthetic Physiology and Dry Matter Accumulation of Maize[J]. JOURNAL OF YUNNAN AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY（Natural Science）, 2020, 35(2): 187-195. DOI: 10.12101/j.issn.1004-390X(n).201811001
[5]	Tongxin AN, Yuanman YANG, Feng ZHOU, Zhiwei FAN, Mengli CHEN, Jing LU, Bozhi WU. Effect of Maize and Potato Intercropping on Their Root Growth and Distribution[J]. JOURNAL OF YUNNAN AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY（Natural Science）, 2018, 33(2): 363-370. DOI: 10.12101/j.issn.1004-390X(n).201504030
[6]	XU Zhaoli, YANG Yuhong, DUAN Yuqi, JIN Yan. Effect of Nitrogen Application Rate and Nitrate Nitrogen Ratio on Accumulation and Distribution of P, K and Cl of Flue-cured Tobacco[J]. JOURNAL OF YUNNAN AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY（Natural Science）, 2017, 32(6): 1028-1035. DOI: 10.16211/j.issn.1004-390X(n).2017.06.010
[7]	JIA Manman, XIAO Jingxiu, TANG Li, ZHENG Yi. Effects of Nitrogen Supply on Yields and Photosynthesis Characteristics of Crops in Wheat and Broad Bean Intercropping[J]. JOURNAL OF YUNNAN AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY（Natural Science）, 2017, 32(2): 350-357. DOI: 10.16211/j.issn.1004-390X(n).2017.02.022
[8]	ZHANG Leichang, TANG Li, DONG Yan, ZHENG Yi. Nitrogen Absorption of Crops Affected by Root Interaction in Maize and Soybean Intercropping[J]. JOURNAL OF YUNNAN AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY（Natural Science）, 2016, 31(6): 1111-1119. DOI: 10.16211/j.issn.1004-390X(n).2016.06.022
[9]	QIN Xiaomin, ZHENG Yi, TANG Li, LONG Guangqiang. Effects of Nitrogen Application Rates on Rhizosphere Soil Enzyme Activity and Potential Nitrification in Maize and Potato Intercropping[J]. JOURNAL OF YUNNAN AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY（Natural Science）, 2015, 30(6): 886-894. DOI: 10.16211/j.issn.1004-390X(n).2015.06.010
[10]	SUN Jianping, TANG Li, XU Yongbo, ZHENG Yi. Effect of Nitrogen Application on Urease Activity in Rhizosphere Soil of Wheat and Faba Bean Intercropping System[J]. JOURNAL OF YUNNAN AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY（Natural Science）, 2015, 30(3): 464-470. DOI: 10.16211/j.issn.1004-390X(n).2015.03.023

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(10)

1.	阮贞静，周静，李海，王强凤，傅敬东，纪韵祚，张振林，安曈昕. 氮肥追施对烤烟套作早熟玉米氮素利用及产质量的影响. 云南农业大学学报(自然科学). 2024(06): 151-159 .
2.	常青，李立军，渠佳慧，张艳丽，韩冬雨，赵鑫瑶. 土默川平原麦后复种饲用玉米‖油菜模式的增产优势及氮素利用效率. 作物杂志. 2023(03): 167-174 .
3.	梅富鹏，黄之远，吴加香，寸梦壵，赵桂茹，李世华，杨旺福，字淑慧. 减氮对玉米黄草乌间作优势的影响. 云南农业大学学报(自然科学). 2022(05): 890-896 .
4.	郭涛，邢英英，姜文婷，李卓远，张腾，密菲瑶，王秀康. 滴灌施肥对马铃薯根层土壤养分含量、产量及水分利用效率的影响. 河南农业科学. 2021(09): 16-24 .
5.	乔冰洁，杨小华，吴静，徐宝连. 马铃薯-玉米间作模式研究进展. 中国马铃薯. 2021(05): 463-468 .
6.	赵薇，伊文博，王顶，吴开贤，赵平，龙光强，汤利. 间作对马铃薯种植土壤硝化作用和硝态氮供应的影响. 应用生态学报. 2020(12): 4171-4179 .
7.	钱韩玲，朱启林，周龙，龙光强，汤利. 间作促进作物磷吸收的氮素调控效应. 农业资源与环境学报. 2019(04): 471-479 .
8.	王雪蓉，张润芝，李淑敏，许宁，牟尧，张春怡. 不同供氮水平下玉米/大豆间作体系干物质积累和氮素吸收动态模拟. 中国生态农业学报(中英文). 2019(09): 1354-1363 .
9.	钱欣，许和水，葛军勇，曾昭海，任长忠，郭来春，王春龙，胡跃高. 施氮量及间作对燕麦、向日葵生产力及土壤硝态氮累积的影响. 中国农业大学学报. 2018(03): 1-9 .
10.	刘鸿高，李建宾，顾才上，吴伯志. 间作马铃薯覆盖不同地膜对土壤温湿度和产量的影响. 云南农业大学学报(自然科学). 2017(01): 44-51 .

Other cited types(7)

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article views (1834) PDF downloads (534) Cited by(17)

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

The Effect of Adding Chitosan in Feed on Growth Performance and Slaughter Performance of Peking Duck

Abstract

References

Related Articles

Cited by

Periodical cited type(10)

Other cited types(7)

Catalog

The Effect of Adding Chitosan in Feed on Growth Performance and Slaughter Performance of Peking Duck

Abstract

References

Related Articles

Cited by

Periodical cited type(10)

Other cited types(7)

Catalog

Export File

Citation

Format

Content