• Chinese Science Citation Database (CSCD) Source Journals
  • A Guide to the Core Journals of China
  • Top 100 Sci-Tech Journals of Chinese Universities
  • Chinese Science and Technical Core Journals
  • China Agriculture and Forestry Core Journals (Category A)
SUN Jianping, TANG Li, XU Yongbo, et al. Effect of Nitrogen Application on Urease Activity in Rhizosphere Soil of Wheat and Faba Bean Intercropping System[J]. JOURNAL OF YUNNAN AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY(Natural Science), 2015, 30(3): 464-470. DOI: 10.16211/j.issn.1004-390X(n).2015.03.023
Citation: SUN Jianping, TANG Li, XU Yongbo, et al. Effect of Nitrogen Application on Urease Activity in Rhizosphere Soil of Wheat and Faba Bean Intercropping System[J]. JOURNAL OF YUNNAN AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY(Natural Science), 2015, 30(3): 464-470. DOI: 10.16211/j.issn.1004-390X(n).2015.03.023

Effect of Nitrogen Application on Urease Activity in Rhizosphere Soil of Wheat and Faba Bean Intercropping System

More Information
  • Received Date: March 23, 2014
  • Revised Date: September 23, 2014
  • Published Date: May 15, 2015
  • Urease activity influences the transformation of urea and nutrients utilization of crops in soil. Field experiment was conducted to investigate the effects of nitrogen application rates on urease activity of rhizospheric soil in wheat//faba bean system, nitrogen application rates of wheat were 0(N0), 112.5(N1), 225.0(N2), 337.5(N3)kg/hm2; The nitrogen application rate of faba bean was the half of the wheat. The results showed that nitrogen application could improve the yield of wheat//faba bean and the LER of N0, N1, N2 and N3 were 1.15, 1.10, 1.05 and 1.02, respectively. The wheat//faba bean intercropping system had advantage of yield. Nitrogen application influenced the urease activity in the rhizospheric soil of wheat and faba bean. Compared with monocropping, in the tillering stages, the urease activity in rhizospheric soil of wheat in intercropping system increased by 4.66% and the order of increasing amount was N0N2N1N3, while the urease activity in rhizospheric soil of faba bean in intercropping increased by 6.60% and the order of increasing amount was N2N1N0N3. In the jointing stages, the urease activity in the rhizospheric soil of wheat in intercropping increased by14.08% and the order of increasing amount was N2N1N3N0, while the urease activity in rhizospheric soil of faba bean in intercropping increased by 8.24% and the order of increasing amount was N0N2N1N3. In the maturing stages, the rhizospheric soil urease activity of wheat in intercropping increased by 7.03% and the order of increasing amount was N2N3N1N0, while the rhizospheric soil urease activity of faba bean in intercropping are increased by 5.25% and the order of increasing amount was N0N1N2N3. It is concluded that the level of nitrogen application have a great influence on the urease activity in rhizospheric soil of wheat and faba bean in wheat//faba bean system.
  • [1] 张为政. 作物茬口对土壤酶活性和微生物的影响[J]. 土壤肥料, 1993(5): 12-14.
    [2] [2] 李勇. 试论土壤酶活性与土壤肥力[J]. 土壤通报, 1989, 20(4): 190-192.
    [3] [3] 孙波, 赵其国, 张桃林, 等. 土壤质量与持续环境Ⅲ.土壤质量评价的生物学指标[J]. 土壤, 1997, 29(5): 225-234.
    [4] [4] TILMAN D, REICH P B, KNOPS J, et al. Diversity and productivity in a long-term grassland experiment[J]. Science, 2001, 294(5543): 843-845.
    [5] [5] 郭建英, 万方浩, 胡雅辉, 等. 不同作物布局对转基因抗虫棉田节肢动物群落结构的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2007, 18(9): 2061-2068.
    [6] [6] ZHU Y Y, CHEN H R, FAN J H, et al. Genetic diversity and disease control in rice[J]. Nature, 2000, 406: 718-722.
    [7] [7] TSUBO M, WALKER S, MUKHALA E. Comparisons of radiation use efficiency of mono-/inter-cropping systems with different row orientations[J]. Field Crops Research, 2001,71:17-29
    [8] [8] 董艳, 汤利, 郑毅, 等. 施氮对间作蚕豆根际微生物区系和枯萎病发生的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2010, 30(7): 1797-1805.
    [9] [9] 赵平, 郑毅, 汤利, 等. 小麦蚕豆间作施氮对小麦氮素吸收、累积的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2010, 18(4): 742-747.
    [10] [10] 魏兰芳, 汤利, 郑毅, 等. 小麦蚕豆间作条件下不同施氮量对作物根际微生物数量的影响[J]. 云南农业大学学报: 自然科学, 2008, 23(3): 368-374.
    [11] [11] 邱现奎, 董元杰, 万勇善, 等. 不同施肥处理对土壤养分含量及土壤酶活性的影响[J]. 土壤, 2010, 42(2): 249-255.
    [12] [12] 关松荫. 土壤酶及其研究法[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 1986:260-360.
    [13] [13] 徐雁, 向成华, 李贤伟. 土壤酶的研究概况[J]. 四川林业科技, 2010, 31(2): 14-20.
    [14] [14] 曾艳, 周柳强, 黄金生, 等. 不同氮肥处理对桑园土壤酶活性的影响[J]. 南方农业学报, 2013, 44(22): 253-256.
    [15] [15] 袁玲, 杨邦俊, 郑兰君, 等. 长期施肥对土壤酶活性和氮磷养分的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 1997, 3(4): 301-307.
    [16] [16] 郭天财, 宋晓, 马冬云, 等. 施氮量对冬小麦根际土壤酶活性的影响[J]. 应用生态报, 2008, 19(1): 110-114.
    [17] [17] CARREIRO M M, SINSABAUGH R L, REPERT D A, et al. Microbial enzyme shifts explain litter decay responses to simulated nitrogen deposition[J]. Ecology, 2000, 81: 2359-2365.
    [18] [18] 薛冬, 姚槐应, 何振立, 等. 红壤酶活性与肥力的关系[J]. 应用生态学报, 2005, 16(8): 1455-1458.
    [19] [19] 熊明彪, 雷孝章, 曹叔尤, 等. 小麦生长期内土壤养分与土壤酶活性变化及其相关性研究[J]. 水土保持学报, 2003, 17(4): 27-30.
    [20] [20] 高秀君, 张仁陟, 杨招弟. 不同耕作方式对旱地土壤酶活性动态的影响[J]. 土壤通报, 2008, 39(5): 1012-1026.
    [21] [21] 马忠明, 杜少平, 王平, 等. 长期定位施肥对小麦玉米间作土壤酶活性的影响[J]. 核农学报, 2011, 25(4): 796-801.
    [22] [22] 覃娟, 李剑, 刘霞. 甘蓝水萝卜间作对土壤理化性状及酶活性影响[J]. 北方园艺, 2010(7): 20-22.
    [23] [23] 王俊华, 尹睿, 张华勇, 等. 长期定位施肥对农田土壤酶活性及其相关因素的影响[J]. 生态环境, 2007, 16(1): 191-196.
    [24] [24] 刘恩科, 赵秉强, 李秀英, 等. 长期施肥对土壤微生物量及土壤酶活性的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2008, 32(1): 176-182.
    [25] [25] 刘均霞, 陆引罡, 远红伟, 等. 玉米/大豆间作条件下作物根系对氮素的吸收利用[J]. 华北农学报, 2008, 23(1): 173-175.
    [26] [26] 王平, 马忠明, 包兴国, 等. 长期不同施肥方式对小麦玉米间作土壤蔗糖酶活性的影响[J]. 农业现代化研究, 2009, 30(5): 611-614.
    [27] [27] 范君华, 刘明. 塔里木海岛棉生育全程土壤微生物与酶活性的动态变化[J]. 中国农学通报, 2005, 21(4): 202-205.
    [28] [28] 刘均霞, 陆引罡, 远红伟, 等. 玉米大豆间作对根际土壤微生物数量和酶活性的影响[J]. 贵州农业科学, 2007, 35(2): 60-61.
    [29] [29] 姜莉, 陈源泉, 隋鹏, 等. 不同间作形式对玉米根际土壤酶活性的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2010, 26(9): 326-330.
    [30] [30] 张向前, 黄国勤, 卞新民, 等. 间作对玉米品质产量及土壤微生物数量和酶活性的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2012, 32(22): 7082-7090.
    [31] [31] 章铁, 刘秀清, 孙晓莉, 等. 栗茶间作模式对土壤酶活性和土壤养分的影响[J].中国农学通报, 2008, 24(4): 265-268.
  • Related Articles

    [1]DAI Xingxun, DI Yining, LI Wanting, ZHU Liping, LI Weichun, SHA Bencai, ZI Shuhui, LIU Lufeng. Screening, Identification and Biological Activity of Rhizosphere Functional Microorganisms in Alpine Aconitum carmichaelii[J]. JOURNAL OF YUNNAN AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY(Natural Science). DOI: 10.12101/j.issn.1004-390X(n).202411019
    [2]DUAN Yipeng, TANG Aiping, WU Yongming, LI Liang, LI Ya, DENG Mi, LIU Yajun. Effects of Different Remediation Measures on Physicochemical Properties and Enzyme Activities of Cadmium- contaminated Paddy Soil[J]. JOURNAL OF YUNNAN AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY(Natural Science), 2024, 39(6): 160-168. DOI: 10.12101/j.issn.1004-390X(n).202403012
    [3]Chengqian LIU, Shuhua FENG, Xiang LI, Yongmei HE, Yanxue ZHANG, Yanqun ZU, Yuan LI, Chunmei XIE. Effect of Soluble Sugar and Organic Acid on the Active Organic Carbon Content and Methane Emission in Paddy Soil[J]. JOURNAL OF YUNNAN AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY(Natural Science), 2021, 36(4): 708-716, 744. DOI: 10.12101/j.issn.1004-390X(n).202010012
    [4]Zhongkui LI, Yaru DING, Yinggang ZHOU, Aifen LING, Xiaoci LI, Yulan CHEN, Hongli LI, Yan WANG. Effect of Different Previous Crops on the Nutrient Content, Enzyme Activity and Bacterial Community Structure in Tobacco Growing Soil[J]. JOURNAL OF YUNNAN AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY(Natural Science), 2020, 35(4): 708-716. DOI: 10.12101/j.issn.1004-390X(n).201909033
    [5]Xiaoqian LIU, Xingrong DU, Yujiao TAN, Qi LUO, Na WANG. The Effects of Different Ratios between Phosphate-solubilizing Bacteria and Potassium-solubilizing Bacteria Fertilizers on the Flue-cured Tobacco Growth and the Enzyme Activities in the Rhizospheric Soil[J]. JOURNAL OF YUNNAN AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY(Natural Science), 2019, 34(5): 845-851. DOI: 10.12101/j.issn.1004-390X(n).201803046
    [6]Xingying TANG, Yang HONG, Liguang ZHAO, Zhi XU, Li TANG. Effects of Combination of Organic and Inorganic Fertilization on the Normalized Enzyme Activity of Flue-cured Tobacco Soil under Continuing Chemical Fertilizers Reduction[J]. JOURNAL OF YUNNAN AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY(Natural Science), 2019, 34(1): 152-159. DOI: 10.12101/j.issn.1004-390X(n).201705058
    [7]Guanzhen TONG, Xiaoping FU, Yan YANG, Li FENG, Zemin XIANG, Yuehong PU, Jiangping FAN. Advances in Research on the Distribution and Pharmacological Activities of Epicatechin[J]. JOURNAL OF YUNNAN AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY(Natural Science), 2018, 33(2): 343-349. DOI: 10.12101/j.issn.1004-390X(n).201705044
    [8]LI Haojie, LIN Can, YU Xueping, LI Shuiqing. Synthesis and Insecticidal Activity of New Substituted Acylhydrazone Compounds[J]. JOURNAL OF YUNNAN AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY(Natural Science), 2016, 31(4): 761-766. DOI: 10.16211/j.issn.1004-390X(n).2016.04.028
    [9]QIN Xiaomin, ZHENG Yi, TANG Li, LONG Guangqiang. Effects of Nitrogen Application Rates on Rhizosphere Soil Enzyme Activity and Potential Nitrification in Maize and Potato Intercropping[J]. JOURNAL OF YUNNAN AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY(Natural Science), 2015, 30(6): 886-894. DOI: 10.16211/j.issn.1004-390X(n).2015.06.010
    [10]YIN Peng, HU Hongyu, HU Xia, HUANG Jiao, WU Yan. Responses of Soil Microbial Activity under Snow Cover on Litter Input[J]. JOURNAL OF YUNNAN AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY(Natural Science), 2015, 30(4): 618-623. DOI: 10.16211/j.issn.1004-390X(n).2015.04.021
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(10)

    1. 胡冬平,唐江华,徐文修,房彦飞,罗晓颖,王怀港,王晨. 氮肥配施有机肥对半干旱区旱地小麦土壤三大菌群和酶活性及产量的影响. 南京农业大学学报. 2025(01): 144-151 .
    2. 尹若涵,高丹娜,张维玲,许林英,刘琼,祝贞科,鲁顺保,葛体达,张艳杰. 套作蚕豆对梨园土壤肥力和微生物群落结构的影响. 农业资源与环境学报. 2024(05): 1023-1034 .
    3. 王爱萍,姜彧宸,冯月,池田,温强,董琦. 施氮与种植方式对北方旱作农田土壤酶活力及养分含量的影响. 华北农学报. 2023(03): 130-138 .
    4. 李丹丹,姜彧宸,落彩林,冯月,王爱萍,董琦. 氮磷分施和间作对春小麦花期土壤养分和酶活性的影响. 山西农业科学. 2022(10): 1414-1421 .
    5. 杨琼会,樊红柱,李富程,曾祥忠,周子军,秦鱼生. 成都平原冲积水稻土土壤酶活性对轮作模式与长期秸秆还田的响应. 西南农业学报. 2021(03): 508-513 .
    6. 王慧,李鑫,陈梦妮. 水氮配合对不同耐旱性红小豆根际土壤酶活性的影响. 山西农业科学. 2020(11): 1812-1815+1819 .
    7. 谭施北,习金根,郑金龙,贺春萍,吴伟怀,梁艳琼,黄兴,李锐,易克贤. 剑麻麻茎还田及配施不同水平氮肥对土壤肥力和剑麻生长的影响. 热带作物学报. 2019(05): 839-849 .
    8. 秦宇坤,李鹏程,郑苍松,孙淼,刘帅,严智泽,徐文修,董合林. 氮肥施用量对棉花产量及土壤脲酶活性的影响. 新疆农业大学学报. 2018(02): 86-92 .
    9. 刘文辉,张英俊,师尚礼,贺永娟,孙建,魏小星. 高寒区施肥和豆科混播水平对燕麦人工草地土壤酶活性的影响. 草业学报. 2017(01): 23-33 .
    10. 余注光,黄晓露,冯娇银,杨梅. 巨尾桉萌芽林引入降香黄檀后的土壤化学性质变化. 北华大学学报(自然科学版). 2017(02): 243-247 .

    Other cited types(18)

Catalog

    Article views (2107) PDF downloads (387) Cited by(28)