• Chinese Science Citation Database (CSCD) Source Journals
  • A Guide to the Core Journals of China
  • Top 100 Sci-Tech Journals of Chinese Universities
  • Chinese Science and Technical Core Journals
  • China Agriculture and Forestry Core Journals (Category A)
WU Jiong, SHI Cuixian, ZU Yanqun, et al. Research on Soil Moisture Retention Capacity and Crop Water Use Efficiency in Chili Pepper and Maize Intercropping System[J]. JOURNAL OF YUNNAN AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY(Natural Science), 2016, 31(1): 153-159. DOI: 10.16211/j.issn.1004-390X(n).2016.01.024
Citation: WU Jiong, SHI Cuixian, ZU Yanqun, et al. Research on Soil Moisture Retention Capacity and Crop Water Use Efficiency in Chili Pepper and Maize Intercropping System[J]. JOURNAL OF YUNNAN AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY(Natural Science), 2016, 31(1): 153-159. DOI: 10.16211/j.issn.1004-390X(n).2016.01.024

Research on Soil Moisture Retention Capacity and Crop Water Use Efficiency in Chili Pepper and Maize Intercropping System

More Information
  • Received Date: March 26, 2015
  • Revised Date: May 24, 2015
  • Published Date: January 15, 2016
  • Field experiments were conducted in order to understand effects of soil moisture retention capacity, soil water storage and crop water use efficiency in chili pepper and maize intercropping system (10:2) in Yanshan County, Yunnan Province in 2013. The results showed that: (1) soil moisture retention capacity in intercropped marginal chili pepper line and middle chili pepper line were higher than those in soil of monoculture system. Soil moisture retention capacity in growth period was higher than that in fruiting stage. The average non-capillary water-holding capacity of intercropped chili pepper was higher 54.86% than monoculture system. (2) Soil water storage in maize monoculture system was higher than in chili pepper monoculture system in harvesting stage. Soil water storage in harvesting stage was higher 64.95% than in sowing stage. (3) Yield and crop water use efficiency of intercropped middle chili pepper line were higher than marginal chili pepper line, but there were not significant different among intercropping system and monoculture system. Yield and crop water use efficiency of intercropped maize were higher than monoculture system. Soil water storage, yield, and crop water use efficiency are improved by maize and pepper intercropping.
  • [1] 高金虎,孙占祥,冯良山,等. 秸秆与氮肥配施对玉米生长及水分利用效率的影响[J]. 东北农业大学学报,2011,42(11):116.
    [2] [2] LI L, SUN J H, ZHANG F S, et al. Wheat/maize or wheat/soybean strip intercropping: I. Yield advantage and interspecific interactions on nutrients [J]. Field Crops Research, 2001, 71(2):123.
    [3] [3] AGEGNEHU G, GHIZAW A, SINEBO W. Yield potential and land-use efficiency of wheat and fababean mixed intercropping [J]. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 2008,28:257.
    [4] [4] 安瞳昕,李彩虹,吴伯志,等. 玉米不同间作方式对坡耕地水土流失的影响[J].水土保持学报,2007,21(5):18.
    [5] [5] 王俊强,腾云飞,马宝新,等.玉米/辣椒间作群体对光能利用的研究[J].中国农学通报,2010,26(13):109.
    [6] [6] 杨翠玲,祖艳群,李元,等. 不同配比的蔬菜与玉米间套作消减农田径流污染的研究[J]. 农业环境科学学报,2013,32(2):378.
    [7] [7] 徐小军,何丙辉,胡恒,等.汶川地震区土壤物理性质与渗透性的坡面分布特征[J].水土保持研究,2011,25(6):34.
    [8] [8] 赵锦梅,张徳罡,刘长仲.东祁连山土地利用方式对土壤持水能力和渗透性的影响[J].自然资源学报,2012,27(3):422.
    [9] [9] 宋泽芬,王克勤,杨云华,等.澄江山河流域不同土地利用类型面源污染输出特征[J].水土保持学报,2008,22(2):98.
    [10] [10] 魏镇泽,柴强,黄鹏,等. 玉米间作豌豆水分利用效率对供水水平和种植密度的响应[J]. 西北农业学报,2012,21(8):135.
    [11] [11] 郭清毅,黄高宝. 保护性耕作对旱地麦-豆双序列轮作农田土壤水利用效率的影响[J].水土保持学报,2005,19(3):165.
    [12] [12] 柴亚凡,王恩姮,陈祥伟,等. 植被恢复模式对黑土贮水性能及水分入渗特征的影响[J].水土保持学报,2008,22(1):60.
    [13] [13] 李红,范素芳,张光灿,等. 黄土丘陵区退耕还林后不同林地土壤孔隙与贮水特性[J].水土保持通报,2010,30(1):27.
    [14] [14] 李卓,吴普特,冯浩,等. 容重对土壤水分蓄持能力影响模拟试验研究[J].土壤学报,2010,47(7):611.
    [15] [15] 马波,吴发启,陈宇,等.玉米不同生育期茎秆流特征及模型构建[J].农业工程学报,2011,27(1):118.
    [16] [16] 李淑文,于淼,杜建云,等.不同灌水处理下土壤水分动态及玉米水分利用效率研究[J].河北农业大学学报,2010,33(4):17.
    [17] [17] 祖艳群,胡文友,吴伯志,等.辣椒玉米间作条件下作物对氮、磷和钾的吸收利用特征研究[J].中国农学通报,2009,25(12):234.
    [18] [18] 殷文,柴强,胡发龙. 少耕轮作小麦间作玉米的产量表现和水分利用效率[J].西北农业学报,2013,22(6):47.
  • Related Articles

    [1]WANG Zhaodi, MASIXONXAY Kuwait, WANG Junle, LI Mingrui, QIN Li, ZHAN Fangdong, YANG Zhixin. Effects of Soil Sterilization and Fungicide Application on Growth and Heavy Metal Accumulation in Soybean[J]. JOURNAL OF YUNNAN AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY(Natural Science), 2024, 39(5): 151-159. DOI: 10.12101/j.issn.1004-390X(n).202309018
    [2]SONG Xinru, GENG Jicheng, XU Jie, CHEN Jianjun, CHEN Jun, DENG Weiping, MEI Xinyue. Risk Assessment and Accumulation Characteristics of Five Heavy Metals in Panax notoginseng[J]. JOURNAL OF YUNNAN AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY(Natural Science), 2024, 39(1): 153-158. DOI: 10.12101/j.issn.1004-390X(n).202212042
    [3]Yuanyuan CHEN, Hongguang DOU, Wenjin DING, Sina TAO, Haipeng ZHANG. Effects of Biogas Slurry Replacement on Soil Nutrients and Heavy Metal Accumulation in Annual Wheat-maize Rotation in Shajiang Black Soil Area[J]. JOURNAL OF YUNNAN AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY(Natural Science), 2023, 38(4): 684-693. DOI: 10.12101/j.issn.1004-390X(n).202301005
    [4]Yan MEI, Wengang CUI, Suihua LIU, Fang LIU, Xinding ZHANG, Yuemei HUANG, Hongze ZHANG, Yunlu LI. Heavy Metal Pollution Status and Human Health Risk Assessment of Farmland around the Karst Mining Area in Central Guizhou[J]. JOURNAL OF YUNNAN AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY(Natural Science), 2022, 37(6): 1071-1080. DOI: 10.12101/j.issn.1004-390X(n).202205027
    [5]Hanwen CUI, Guangbin YANG, Wengang CUI. Distribution Characteristics and Risk Assessment of Soil Heavy Metal in Karst Peri-urban Areas in Guanshan Lake District, Guiyang City[J]. JOURNAL OF YUNNAN AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY(Natural Science), 2022, 37(2): 351-357. DOI: 10.12101/j.issn.1004-390X(n).202104024
    [6]Dongmei LU, Xue LI, Jifen LI, Jiliang WEN, Shuying LI, Chunrong ZHU, Yuanqing ZHOU, Cuiping ZHANG. Heavy Metal Pollution Characteristics and Ecological Risk Analysis for Soil in Tea Core Plantations of Xinping County[J]. JOURNAL OF YUNNAN AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY(Natural Science), 2018, 33(6): 1154-1162. DOI: 10.12101/j.issn.1004-390X(n).201804037
    [7]JIANG Jialei, SI Wen, TANG Xiaodong, ZHAO Panpan, ZHU Shuxiu, LIN Ken, CHEN Xiaoshui, LU Minghua. Research on the Linear Comprehensive Evaluation Model of Heavy Metals in Tobacco Leaf[J]. JOURNAL OF YUNNAN AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY(Natural Science), 2017, 32(2): 276-287. DOI: 10.16211/j.issn.1004-390X(n).2017.02.013
    [8]QIN Li, ZHAN Fangdong, ZU Yanqun, MENG Jingxuan, JIN Lei, LI Yuan. Accumulation Characteristics of Pb,Cd and Zn by Chenopodium ambrosioides L.Intercropping With Maize and Broad Bean[J]. JOURNAL OF YUNNAN AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY(Natural Science), 2017, 32(1): 153-160. DOI: 10.16211/j.issn.1004-390X(n).2017.01.023
    [9]WANG Huifang, YU Chaoguang, WANG Tao, XIE Yinfeng. The Research Progresses on Mitigative Mechanism of Silicon on Heavy Metal Toxicity in Plant[J]. JOURNAL OF YUNNAN AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY(Natural Science), 2016, 31(3): 528-535. DOI: 10.16211/j.issn.1004-390X(n).2016.03.021
    [10]LI Ling, ZHANG Yu, LIAN Yanxue, LIN Quanying. Pollution and Assessment of Heavy Metals in Roadside Pavement Sediment of Wuyishan City[J]. JOURNAL OF YUNNAN AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY(Natural Science), 2015, 30(6): 916-923. DOI: 10.16211/j.issn.1004-390X(n).2015.06.014
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(9)

    1. 邹文桐,王艳君,曹智,金美芳,林茂兹. 不同种植模式下重金属污染对牧草叶片光合特性和重金属含量的影响. 热带亚热带植物学报. 2021(01): 31-40 .
    2. 闫秀秀,徐应明,王林,陶雪莹,孙约兵,梁学峰. 叶用油菜和孔雀草间作对植物生长和镉累积的影响. 环境科学. 2020(11): 5151-5159 .
    3. 徐年,詹林川,刘娜,薛中俊,赵颖颖,胡宏祥,符小菲,李先藩,吴孟君. 间作黑麦草-酸模对油菜生长及镉富集的影响. 惠州学院学报. 2019(03): 44-48 .
    4. 王吉秀,李祖然,李博,李元,湛方栋,祖艳群,何永美. 间作植物根系对Pb斑块胁迫适应机制. 农业环境科学学报. 2019(12): 2738-2748 .
    5. 朱红霞,贾艳蕾,景华宇,张家洋. 混种3种观赏植物对白三叶铅积累的影响. 水土保持学报. 2018(01): 291-296+302 .
    6. 刘小平,高润霞,吕发生,刘华强,廖敦秀. 小白菜间作对苎麻地上部分汞吸收富集的影响. 中国农学通报. 2018(24): 29-33 .
    7. 亓琳,王晓凌,赵威,兰志坚. 锶在蚕豆中的富集特征及其对抗氧化酶活性的影响. 核农学报. 2017(12): 2392-2398 .
    8. 刘晨,郭佳,赵敏,钟斌,郭华,侯淑贞,徐炜杰,杨芸,王任远,叶正钱,柳丹. 毛竹幼苗与伴矿景天间作对铜镉锌转运积累的影响. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版). 2017(05): 615-622 .
    9. 陈青春,陈平. 植物修复技术在环境污染治理的应用现状. 污染防治技术. 2016(02): 59-62+69 .

    Other cited types(12)

Catalog

    Article views (2116) PDF downloads (561) Cited by(21)