Relationship between the Occurrence of Tomato Spotted Wilt Virus and the Number of <i>Frankliniella occidentalis</i> in Zhaotong Tobacco Fields

Yanru DUAN; Junzhang YANG; Tanggui YOU; Yaping CHEN; Yongping TAO; Shuqi HE; Furong GUI

doi:10.12101/j.issn.1004-390X(n).202002010

JOURNAL OF YUNNAN AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY（Natural Science） > 2020 > 35(6): 950-956. > DOI: 10.12101/j.issn.1004-390X(n).202002010

Yanru DUAN, Junzhang YANG, Tanggui YOU, et al. Relationship between the Occurrence of Tomato Spotted Wilt Virus and the Number of Frankliniella occidentalis in Zhaotong Tobacco Fields[J]. JOURNAL OF YUNNAN AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY（Natural Science）, 2020, 35(6): 950-956. DOI: 10.12101/j.issn.1004-390X(n).202002010

Citation:

PDF (884 KB)

Relationship between the Occurrence of Tomato Spotted Wilt Virus and the Number of Frankliniella occidentalis in Zhaotong Tobacco Fields

1.
College of Plant Protection, Yunnan Agricultural University, State Key Laboratory of Conservation and Utilization of Biological Resources of Yunnan, Kunming 650201, China
2.
Zhaotong Tobacco Company of Yunnan Province, Zhaotong 657000, China

More Information

Received Date: February 13, 2020
Revised Date: July 04, 2020
Available Online: September 03, 2020
Published Date: November 29, 2020

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

PurposeTo verify the occurrence of tomato spotted wilt virus (TSWV) in three tobacco fields in Zhaotong, and its relationship with the number of dominant thrips that transmitted the virus.
MethodWith plate beating and blue sticky trap, the five points sampling method was used to survey and record the species and the number of thrips, the occurrence rate of TSWV in Zhaotong tobacco fields was also investigated, and the relationship between the virus and the thrips population was analyzed.
ResultThe major thrips species in Zhaotong tobacco fields were: Frankliniella occidentalis, F. intonsa, Thrips tabaci and T. palmi, among which F. occidentalis was the dominant species, accounting for 81.97% of the total thrips collected. The peak seasons of the F. occidentalis was found in June to July, the results of plate beating and blue sticky trap showed that the cumulative number of F. occidentalis in high-incidence fields was significantly higher than those in the medium-and low-incidence fields (P<0.05), which could reach 3 to 4 times of the low-incidence fields; the number of F. occidentalis on the pheromone blue board [(1204.08±194.76) heads/board] could reach 2.39 times of the common blue board [(503.59±55.63) heads/board], it’s indicate that pheromone blue board had better trapping effect than common blue board. The incidence of TSWV in the three tobacco fields was low at root extending stage (early May to early June), and it’s gradually increases at rapid growth and maturity stages (early June to early September), the occurrence rate of TSWV was between (4.03±0.68)% (low-incidence fields) and (9.01±1.37)% (high-incidence fields). The results of correlation analysis showed that the occurrence rate of TSWV and F. occidentalis population in Zhaotong tobacco fields had a significant positive correlation, which the correlation coefficient was between 0.874 and 0.977.
ConclusionThe occurrence of tomato spotted wilt virus was closely related to the number of F. occidentalis in Zhaotong tobacco fields, “Pest control” is beneficial to control the occurrence of tomato spotted wilt virus.
- tobacco,
- Frankliniella occidentalis,
- tomato spotted wilt virus,
- blue sticky trap

FullText(HTML)

References (35)

References

[1]	BRITTLEBANK C C. Tomato diseases[J]. Journal of the Department of Agriculture in Victoria, 1919, 17: 231.
[2]	唐霜, 沈姝, 史君明, 等. 布尼亚病毒目新分类概述[J]. 生物多样性, 2018, 26(9): 90. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2018042.
[3]	PARRELLA G, GOGNALONS P, GEBRE-SELASSIÈ K, et al. An update of the host range of tomato spotted wilt virus[J]. Journal of Plant Pathology, 2003, 85(4): 227. DOI: 10.1002/jpln.200390076.
[4]	程晓非, 武晓云, 李凡, 等. 番茄斑萎病毒属病毒的多样性[J]. 云南农业大学学报(自然科学), 2007, 22(4): 495. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-390X.2007.04.007.
[5]	尼秀媚, 陈长法, 封立平, 等. 番茄斑萎病毒研究进展[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2014, 42(19): 6253. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0517-6611.2014.19.054.
[6]	姚革. 四川晒烟上发现番茄斑萎病毒(TSWV)[J]. 烟草科技, 1992(6): 41. DOI: 10.13496/j.issn.1007-5119.1992.04.001.
[7]	尹跃艳, 董家红, 徐兴阳, 等. 昆明番茄斑萎病毒不同分离物N基因遗传多样性分析[J]. 西南农业学报, 2013, 26(1): 159. DOI: 10.16213/j.cnki.scjas.2013.01.001.
[8]	于海芹, 刘勇, 黄昌军. 云南省主要烟区正番茄斑萎病毒属(Orthotospovirus)病毒的调查和检测[J/OL]. 基因组学与应用生物学. (2019-11-12)[2019-12-27]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/45.1369.Q.20191111.1554.004.html.
[9]	WIJKAMP I, ALMARZA N, GOLDBACH R, et al. Distinct levels of specifity in thrips transmission of tospovirus[J]. Phytopathology, 1995, 85(10): 1069. DOI: 10.1094/Phyto-85-1069.
[10]	MEDEIROS R B, RESENDE R D O, DE AVILA A C. The plant virus tomato spotted wilt tospovirus activates the immune system of its main insect vector, Frankliniella occidentalis[J]. Journal of Virology, 2004, 78(10): 4976. DOI: 10.1128/JVI.78.10.4976-4982.2004.
[11]	NAGATA T, ALMEIDA A C L, RESENDE R O, et al. The competence of four thrips species to transmit and replicate four tospoviruses[J]. Plant Pathology, 2004, 53(2): 136. DOI: 10.1111/j.0032-0862.2004.00984.x.
[12]	廖倩. 四种蓟马的传毒效率比较及其与病毒发生流行的关系[D]. 金华: 浙江师范大学, 2015.
[13]	张友军, 吴青君, 徐宝云, 等. 危险性外来入侵生物——西花蓟马在北京发生危害[J]. 植物保护, 2003, 29(4): 58. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0529-1542.2003.04.023.
[14]	杜宇, 杨碧, 周力兵, 等. 输华石竹属种苗检疫性有害生物风险评估[J]. 植物检疫, 2001, 15(5): 300. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-2755.2001.05.021.
[15]	路虹, 石宝才, 宫亚军. 西花蓟马寄主植物研究初报[C]//罗晨, 季延寿. 第五届生物多样性保护与利用高新科学技术国际研讨会论文集. 北京: 北京科学技术出版社, 2005.
[16]	吕要斌, 张治军, 吴青君, 等. 外来入侵害虫西花蓟马防控技术研究与示范[J]. 应用昆虫学报, 2011, 48(3): 488. DOI: 10.7679/j.issn.2095-1353.2011.086.
[17]	陈建斌, 刘勇, 郑立敏, 等. 番茄斑萎病毒及其与传播介体西花蓟马互作的研究进展[J]. 贵州农业科学, 2017, 45(4): 54. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3601.2017.04.014.
[18]	朱贤朝, 王彦亭, 王智发, 等. 中国烟草病害[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2002.
[19]	SCHNEWEIS D J, WHITFIELD A E, ROTENBERG D. Thrips developmental stage-specific transcriptome response to tomato spotted wilt virus during the virus infection cycle in Frankliniella occidentalis, the primary vector[J]. Virology, 2017, 500: 226. DOI: 10.1016/j.virol.2016.10.009.
[20]	MORITZ G, KUMM S, MOUND L. Tospovirus transmission depends on thrips ontogeny[J]. Virus Research, 2004, 100(1): 143. DOI: 10.1016/j.virusres.2003.12.022.
[21]	NAGATA T, INOUE-NAGATA A K, VAN LENT J, et al. Factors determing vector competence and specificity for transmission of tomato spotted wilt virus[J]. Journal of General Virology, 2002, 83(3): 663. DOI: 10.1099/0022-1317-83-3-663.
[22]	王泽华, 吴青君, 徐宝云, 等. 西花蓟马对多杀菌素的抗性汰选和遗传方式[J]. 应用昆虫学报, 2011, 48(3): 553. DOI: 10.7679/j.issn.2095-1353.2011.096.
[23]	付步礼, 曾东强, 刘奎, 等. 蓟马类害虫抗药性研究进展[J]. 农学学报, 2014, 4(3): 28. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-7774.2014.03.007.
[24]	张宏瑞, OKAJIM S J, LAURENCE A M. 蓟马采集和玻片标本的制作[J]. 昆虫知识, 2006, 43(5): 725. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0452-8255.2006.05.033.
[25]	中国科学院中国动物志编辑委员会. 中国经济昆虫志: 第五十五册: 缨翅目[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1997.
[26]	李云洲, 默宁, 闫见敏, 等. 番茄斑萎病毒病研究进展[J]. 园艺学报, 2018, 45(9): 1750. DOI: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2018-0282.
[27]	郑雪, 李兴勇, 陈晓燕, 等. 番茄斑萎病毒与传毒蓟马发生流行的相关性[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2015, 43(5): 130. DOI: 10.15889/j.issn.1002-1302.2015.05.039.
[28]	杨真. 云南省烟草蓟马种类及其天敌种类研究[D]. 昆明: 云南农业大学, 2016.
[29]	袁成明, 郅军锐, 李景柱, 等. 贵州省蔬菜蓟马的种类、分布及综合防治[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2008, 47(12): 1442. DOI: 10.14088/j.cnki.issn0439-8114.2008.12.030.
[30]	穆青, 潘悦, 蒋水萍, 等. 释放捕食螨对蓟马传播烟草番茄斑萎病的控制效果[J]. 贵州农业科学, 2016, 44(9): 63. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3601.2016.09.015.
[31]	吴树松, 肖春. 西花蓟马在烟草植株上的分布特点及防治技术[J]. 现代农业科技, 2009(15): 169. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-5739.2009.15.121.
[32]	谢永辉, 张留臣, 王志江, 等. 烤烟不同生长期蓟马种类和发生规律分析[J]. 烟草科技, 2019, 52(11): 23. DOI: 10.16135/j.issn1002-0861.2018.0516.
[33]	BRODBECK B V, STAVISKY J, FUNDERBURK J E, et al. Flower nitrogen status and populations of Frankliniella occidentalis feeding on Lycopersicon esculentum[J]. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 2001, 99(2): 165. DOI: 10.1023/A:1019269703960.
[34]	OTIENO J A, STUKENBERG N, WELLER J, et al. Efficacy of LED-enhanced blue sticky traps combined with the synthetic lure Lurem-TR for trapping of western flower thrips (Frankliniella occidentalis)[J]. Journal of Pest Science, 2018, 91(4): 1301. DOI: 10.1007/s10340-018-1005-x.
[35]	米娜. 两种蓟马趋光规律及不同波长色板田间诱捕效果评价[D]. 北京: 中国农业科学院, 2019.

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(13)

1.	曲春娟，刘燊，姜晓静，朱悦，曲明静，李晓. 我国不同地区花生蓟马的物种组成及种群动态. 中国油料作物学报. 2025(01): 176-185 .
2.	陈品璐，杜霞，罗雪峰，李姗蓉，况觅，陈娟妮. 蔬菜主要连作病害发生现状、病原特性及趋势分析. 植物医学. 2025(01): 1-11 .
3.	申莉莉，张富强，张万红，江连强，宫燕伟，刘东阳，刘艳华，沈广材，杨金广. 番茄斑萎病毒的分离鉴定与抗性烟草种质筛选. 植物保护. 2025(02): 97-103 .
4.	帖展疆，张桂源，马朝阳，穆建国，王贺亚，王鹏，惠慧，张学坤. 新疆向日葵主产区有害蓟马优势种群鉴定及其解毒酶对防治药剂的响应. 石河子大学学报(自然科学版). 2024(05): 545-551 .
5.	沈广材，张富强，郭应成，董文凤，申莉莉，杨金广，焦裕冰，宫燕伟. 云南省保山市烟草病毒多样性及其危害特征. 植物医学. 2024(06): 23-31 .
6.	刘泽凡，谢德安，韩家宝，谢晏芬，马力，高斯源，彭瑞琦，赵宇婷，伏祥泽，程文岗，冯永洪，张雁，张华萍，黄英，代磊杰，王岚锋. 无人机低容量喷雾技术对蓟马及番茄斑萎病毒的防治效果. 农药. 2023(02): 146-150 .
7.	陈平，陈鹏，兰平秀，王根朝，李伟，宁德凯，谢永辉，李凡. 巴氏新小绥螨释放方式对烟草大田期西花蓟马的防治效果评价. 云南农业大学学报(自然科学). 2023(05): 764-770 .
8.	孙秀文，王桂萍，刘晓，李霞，王光召，张伟丽，王希波，李丽莉，门兴元，郭文秀，杨向黎，迟宝杰，于毅. 金龟子绿僵菌CQMa421与4种新烟碱类农药混配对西花蓟马毒力的增效作用. 安徽农业科学. 2023(24): 122-126 .
9.	曹旎，苏家恩，周彦夷，张亚斌，李建军，田露，姜艳坤，钟杰，陈锦，杨志娟. 烟草番茄斑萎病防治药剂筛选（英文）. Agricultural Science & Technology. 2023(04): 47-52 .
10.	杨军章，龚林，马若，游堂贵，段艳茹，张燕，唐玉春，马殿丽，和淑琪. 有色地膜覆盖对烟草番茄斑萎病毒病发生的影响. 贵州农业科学. 2022(02): 38-43 .
11.	方丽婷，王盛强，浦仕献，孙浩宸，付堯. 昭通地区烟草番茄斑萎病的发生与综合防治. 现代农业科技. 2022(10): 73-76 .
12.	杨程. 云南烟区烟草病虫害的立体防治. 植物医学. 2022(03): 18-24 .
13.	段艳茹，和淑琪，陈亚平，马若，杨军章，桂富荣. 高CO_2浓度下西花蓟马在烟草上的生长发育和繁殖特征. 南方农业学报. 2021(02): 404-411 .

Other cited types(1)

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article views (2160) PDF downloads (21) Cited by(14)

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Relationship between the Occurrence of Tomato Spotted Wilt Virus and the Number of Frankliniella occidentalis in Zhaotong Tobacco Fields

Abstract

References

Cited by

Periodical cited type(13)

Other cited types(1)

Catalog

Export File

Citation

Format

Content