• Core Journal of Chinese Humanities and Social Sciences of AMI
  • National Excellent Social Science Journal of Agricultural Universities
  • The most popular journal of Comprehensive Humanities and Social Sciences
FENG Yingbin, GUO Yuanyuan, KONG Lingshen. The Cognition and Influencing Factors of the Damage of Rural Households' Housing Land Quittance Rights[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Social Science), 2019, 13(6): 130-136. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-390X(s).2019.06.020
Citation: FENG Yingbin, GUO Yuanyuan, KONG Lingshen. The Cognition and Influencing Factors of the Damage of Rural Households' Housing Land Quittance Rights[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Social Science), 2019, 13(6): 130-136. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-390X(s).2019.06.020

The Cognition and Influencing Factors of the Damage of Rural Households' Housing Land Quittance Rights

DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-390X(s).2019.06.020
More Information
  • Received Date: May 07, 2019
  • Revised Date: May 19, 2019
  • Based on the survey data of 167 rural households in 6 counties of Guizhou Province, this paper uses the dual Logistic regression model to probes into the cognition of damage of the rights and interests and the difference of influencing factors in the process of housing land quittance. The results showed that the proportion of farmers who perceived their rights and interests to be damaged was 34.73% and 65.27% respectively. The main factors influencing the cognition of farmers' rights and interests are the age of the head of household, the education level of the head of household, the number of family population, the coefficient of maintenance, the total income of the family, the area of the homestead, the situation and the channels of understanding. Under the condition of significant level, the age of the head of household, the number of family population, the area of homestead and the channels of understanding have a positive effect on the cognition of farmers' rights and interests, the education level of head of household, the coefficient of maintenance, the total income of the family and the situation of understanding have the negative effect. In the process of homestead reclamation in the future, according to different regions, different types of farmers take targeted policies and measures to effectively promote homestead reclamation under the premise of uniform compensation standard.
  • [1]
    王敏,诸培新,张建.农地流转对农户宅基地退出意愿影响研究:基于江苏省855户农户的调查结果分析[J].南京农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2016, 16(4

    ):81.
    [2]
    许恒周,郭玉燕,吴冠岑,等.代际差异视角下农民工土地流转意愿的影响因素分析:基于天津613份调查问卷的实证研究[J].资源科学, 2012, 34(10):1864.
    [3]
    吴云青,王多多,密长林,等.生计资产差异对农户宅基地退出意愿的影响研究:基于天津市403份调查问卷的实证分析[J].干旱区资源与环境, 2017, 31(9):26. DOI: 10.

    13448/j. cnki. Jalre. 2017. 275.
    [4]
    彭长生.农民分化对农村宅基地退出补偿模式选择的影响分析:基于安徽省的农户调查数据[J].经济社会体制比较, 2013(6):133.
    [5]
    孙艳梅,刘新平,周义才.少数民族聚居区农户宅基地退出意愿影响因素分析:以新疆特克斯县为例[J].中国农业资源与区划, 2016, 37(12):36. DOI: 10.

    7621/cjarrp. 1005-9121. 20161206.
    [6]
    佟艳,牛海鹏,樊良新,等.农户闲置宅基地退出意愿及影响因素研究:以河南省为例[J].干旱区资源与环境, 2017, 31( 10):26. DOI: 10.

    13448/j. cnki. Jalre. 2017. 309.
    [7]
    朱新华.户籍制度对农户宅基地退出意愿的影响[J].中国人口·资源与环境, 2014, 24( 10):129. DOI: 10.

    3969/j. issn. 1002-2104. 2014. 10. 018.
    [8]
    王兆林,杨庆媛,骆东奇.农民宅基地退出差异性受偿意愿及其影响因素分析[J].中国土地科学, 2018, 32(9):28. DOI: 10.

    11994/zgtdkx.20180723.120830.
    [9]
    张婷,张安录,邓松林.期望收益、风险预期及农户宅基地退出行为:基于上海市松江区、金山区农户的实证分析[J].资源科学, 2016, 38(8):1503. DOI: 10.

    18402/resci. 2016.08.09.
    [10]
    朱新华,蔡俊.感知价值、可行能力对农户宅基地退出意愿的影响及其代际差异[J].中国土地科学, 2016, 30(9):64. DOI: 10.

    11994/zgtdkx.20161024.124548.
    [11]
    周晓芳,周永章.贵州典型喀斯特地貌区农村聚落空间分布研究:以清镇红枫区、毕节鸭池区和关岭-贞丰花江区为例[J].中国岩溶, 2011, 30(1):78.
    [12] 吕军书,翁晓宇.农户宅基地退出的补偿意愿调查及政策建议[J].西北农林科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2019, 19(1):52. DOI:10. 13968/j. cnki. 1009-9107. 2019.01.07.
    [13]
    万亚胜,程久苗,吴九兴,等.基于计划行为理论的农户宅基地退出意愿与退出行为差异研究[J].资源科学, 2017, 39(7):1281. DOI: 10.

    18402/resci. 2017.07.06.
    [14]
    王介勇,刘彦随,陈玉福.黄淮海平原农区农户空心村整治意愿及影响因素实证研究[J].地理科学, 2012, 32(12):1452.
    [15]
    夏敏,林庶民,郭贯成.不同经济发展水平地区农民宅基地退出意愿的影响因素:以江苏省7个市为例[J].资源科学, 2016, 38(4):728. DOI: 10.

    18402/resci. 2016.04.14.
    [16]
    张勇.农村宅基地有偿退出的政策与实践:基于2015年以来试点地区的比较分析[J].西北农林科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2019, 19(2

    ):83. DOI:10. 13968/j. cnki. 1009-9107. 2019.02.10.
    [17]
    胡银根,吴欣,王聪,等.农户宅基地有偿退出与有偿使用决策行为影响因素研究:基于传统农区宜城市的实证[J].中国土地科学, 2018, 32(11):21. DOI: 10.

    11994/zgtdkx. 20181101. 142333.
    [18]
    朱新华,陆思璇.风险认知、抗险能力与农户宅基地退出[J].资源科学, 2018, 40(4):698. DOI: 10.

    18402/resci. 2018.04.04.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(1)

    1. 许晨曦,陈英,谢保鹏,裴婷婷. 农户对宅基地“三权分置”政策认知——概念界定、量表开发与效度检验. 干旱区资源与环境. 2022(03): 51-58 .

    Other cited types(5)

Catalog

    Article views (1659) PDF downloads (25) Cited by(6)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return