• Chinese Science Citation Database (CSCD) Source Journals
  • A Guide to the Core Journals of China
  • Top 100 Sci-Tech Journals of Chinese Universities
  • Chinese Science and Technical Core Journals
  • China Agriculture and Forestry Core Journals (Category A)
FAN Xinyang, QIU Lihua, LUO Guoxiang, et al. Analysis of Codon Use Characteristics of CSN3 Gene in River and Swamp Buffalo (Bubalus bubalis)[J]. JOURNAL OF YUNNAN AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY(Natural Science), 2017, 32(2): 238-245. DOI: 10.16211/j.issn.1004-390X(n).2017.02.008
Citation: FAN Xinyang, QIU Lihua, LUO Guoxiang, et al. Analysis of Codon Use Characteristics of CSN3 Gene in River and Swamp Buffalo (Bubalus bubalis)[J]. JOURNAL OF YUNNAN AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY(Natural Science), 2017, 32(2): 238-245. DOI: 10.16211/j.issn.1004-390X(n).2017.02.008

Analysis of Codon Use Characteristics of CSN3 Gene in River and Swamp Buffalo (Bubalus bubalis)

More Information
  • Received Date: August 06, 2016
  • Revised Date: September 13, 2016
  • Published Date: March 29, 2017
  • In this study, codon usage features of milk casein gene CSN3 for both river and swamp buffalo, and the differences in codon usage and evolutionary relationships between buffalo and other species were analyzed based on the data of CSN3 gene from 54 river buffalo and 70 swamp buffalo, and the data of Bos taurus, Bos mutus, Bos bison, Ovis aries, Mus musculus and Homo sapiens recruited from NCBI database. The results showed that codon usage features of CSN3 gene in two types of buffalo were similar. River and swamp buffalo had 26 and 27 biased codon, respectively. Among them, strongly biased codons for both types of buffalo were codon GUU, UCA, AGU, CCA, AGG, GGU and GGA (RSCU ≥ 2). Two types of buffalo only have one difference in the use of the Asp codon, that is, the river buffalo were not bias toward codon GAU and GAC, while swamp buffalo was bias toward codon GAC. Synonymous codon RSCUs of the encoding Asp and Cys of the river type buffalo were 1, while synonymous codon RSCU of swamp buffalo only codon Cys was 1. Furthermore, CSN3 gene of all species in this study were bias toward the synonymous codons with A and U at the third codon position. However,there were differences in the types and numbers of codon usage bias among different species. The differences in codon usage frequency between buffalo and other bovine species were less than those of between buffalo and mouse, and human. Cluster analysis showed two types buffalo gathered into one group, then in turn gathered with cattle, sheep, mouse and human.
  • [1] 徐利娟, 钟金城, 杨万远, 等. 牦牛mtDNA编码蛋白质的基因密码子偏好性研究及聚类分析[J]. 西北农业学报, 2010, 19(6):13. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1389.2010.06.003.
    [2] BULMER M. The selection-mutation-drift theory of synonymous codon usage[J]. Genetics, 1991, 129(3):897.
    [3] MARIN M. Folding at the rhythm of the rare codon beat[J]. Biotechnology Journal, 2008, 3(8):1047. DOI: 10.1002/biot.200800089.
    [4] CHAMARY J V, PARMLEY J L, HURST L D. Hearing silence:non-neutral evolution at synonymous sites in mammals[J]. Nature Reviews Genetics, 2006, 7(2):98.DOI: 10.1038/nrg1770.
    [5] SAUNDERS R, DEANE C M. Synonymous codon usage influences the local protein structure observed[J]. Nucleic Acids Research, 2010, 38(19):6719.DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkq495.
    [6] XIA X. Maximizing transcription efficiency causes codon usage bias[J]. Genetics, 1996, 144(3):1309.
    [7] BONEKAMP F, DALBΦGE H, CHRISTENSEN T, et al. Translation rates of individual codons are not correlated with tRNA abundances or with frequencies of utilization in Escherichia coli[J]. Journal of Bacteriology, 1986, 171(11):5812.
    [8] ANGOV E. Codon usage:nature's roadmap to expression and folding of proteins[J]. Biotechnology Journal, 2011, 6(6):650.DOI: 10.1002/biot.201000332.
    [9] 吴宪明, 吴松锋, 任大明, 等. 密码子偏性的分析方法及相关研究进展[J]. 遗传, 2007, 29(4):420. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-9772.2007.04.006.
    [10] ALEXANDER L J, STEWART A F, MACKINLAY A G, et al. Isolation and characterization of the bovine k-casein gene[J]. European Journal of Biochemistry, 1988, 178(2):395. DOI: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1988.tb14463.x.
    [11] SWAISGOOD H. Primary sequence of kappa-casein[J]. Journal of Dairy Science, 1975, 58(4):583. DOI: S0022-0302(75)84614-5.
    [12] CREAMER L K, PLOWMAN J E, LIDDELL M J, et al. Micelle stability:kappa-casein structure and function[J]. Journal of Dairy Science, 1998, 81(11):3004. DOI: S0022-0302(98)75864-3.
    [13] TAMURA K, PETERSON D, PETERSON N, et al. MEGA5:molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods[J]. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 2011, 28(10):2731. DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msr121.
    [14] 刘庆坡, 谭军, 薛庆中. 籼稻品种93-11同义密码子的使用偏性[J]. 遗传学报, 2003, 30(4):335.
    [15] SHARP P M, LI W H. An evolutionary perspective on synonymous codon usage in unicellular organisms[J]. Journal of Molecular Evolution, 1986, 24(112):28. DOI: 10.1007/BF02099948.
    [16] SHARP P M, COWE E, HIGGINS D G, et al. Codon usage patterns in Escherichia coli, Bacillus subtilis, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Schizosaccharomyces pombe, Drosophila melanogaster and Homo sapiens:a review of the considerable within-species diversity[J]. Nucleic Acids Research, 1988, 16(17):8207. DOI: 10.1093/nar/16.17.8207.
    [17] 张晓峰, 薛庆中. 水稻和拟南芥NBS-LRR基因家族同义密码子使用偏好的比较[J]. 作物学报, 2005, 31(5):596. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:0496-3490.2005.05.012.
    [18] BEHURA S K, SEVERSON D W. Codon usage bias:causative factors, quantification methods and genome-wide patterns:with emphasis on insect genomes[J]. Biological Reviews, 2013, 88(1):49. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2012.00242.x.
    [19] BEHURA S K, STANKE M, DESJARDINS C A, et al. Comparative analysis of nuclear tRNA genes of Nasonia vitripennis and other arthropods, and relationships to codon usage bias[J]. Insect Molecular Biology, 2010, 19:49. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.2002.02057.x.
    [20] BEHURA S K, SEVERSON D W. Coadaptation of isoacceptor tRNA genes and codon usage bias for translation efficiency in Aedes aegypti and Anopheles gambiae[J]. Insect Molecular Biology, 2011, 20(2):177. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2583.2010.01055.x.
    [21] IKEMURA T. Correlation between the abundance of Escherichia coli transfer RNAs and the occurrence of the respective codons in its protein genes[J]. Journal of Molecular Biology, 1981, 146(1):1. DOI: 10.1016/0022-2836(81)90363-6.
    [22] SHARP P M, EMERY L R, ZENG K. Forces that influence the evolution of codon bias[J]. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B:Biological Sciences, 2010, 365(1544):1203. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2009.0305.
    [23] HEY J, KLIMAN R M. Interactions between natural selection, recombination and gene density in the genes of Drosophila[J]. Genetics, 2002, 160(2):595.
    [24] 吴正常, 王靖, 赵乔辉, 等. 猪脂多糖结合蛋白基因(LBP)的密码子偏好性分析[J]. 农业生物技术学报, 2013, 21(10):1135. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7968.2013.10.001.
    [25] 晁岳恩, 吴政卿, 杨会民, 等. 11种植物psbA基因的密码子偏好性及聚类分析[J]. 核农学报, 2011, 25(5):927.
    [26] 刘汉梅, 赵耀, 顾勇, 等. 几种植物waxy基因的密码子用法特性分析[J]. 核农学报, 2010, 24(3):476.
    [27] CHRISTIANSON M. Codon usage patterns distort phylogenies from or of DNA sequences[J]. American Journal of Botany, 2005, 92(8):1221. DOI: 10.3732/ajb.92.8.1221.
    [28] 郭秀丽, 王玉, 杨路成, 等. 茶树CBF1基因密码子使用特性分析[J]. 遗传, 2012, 34(12):1614.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(3)

    1. 冯瑞云, 田翔, 程宏, 王慧杰, 梅超, 左敏, 雷梦林. 蒙古黄芪异黄酮合成酶基因密码子偏好性分析. 山西农业科学. 2019(03): 297-303 .
    2. 苏少锋, 赵一萍, 白东义, 任秀娟, 赵若阳, 陶克涛, 宋海燕, 芒来. 马转录因子TBX3基因的密码子使用偏好性分析. 中国农业大学学报. 2018(07): 53-65 .
    3. 张欣, 尤宏争, 李荣妮, 朱莉飞, 李文通, 梁拥军, 史东杰, 孙砚胜. 金鱼密码子用法特点分析. 华北农学报. 2017(S1): 30-36 .

    Other cited types(0)

Catalog

    Article views (2227) PDF downloads (254) Cited by(3)