• Chinese Science Citation Database (CSCD) Source Journals
  • A Guide to the Core Journals of China
  • Top 100 Sci-Tech Journals of Chinese Universities
  • Chinese Science and Technical Core Journals
  • China Agriculture and Forestry Core Journals (Category A)
Advanced Search
DING Zhilei, ZU Yanqun, CHEN Jianjun, et al. The Influence of Application of Slow-release Fertilizer in Different Proportions on Nitrogen and Phosphorus Loss and Runoff of Agroforestry Systems[J]. JOURNAL OF YUNNAN AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY（Natural Science）, 2016, 31(2): 335-340. DOI: 10.16211/j.issn.1004-390X(n).2016.02.022
Citation: DING Zhilei, ZU Yanqun, CHEN Jianjun, et al. The Influence of Application of Slow-release Fertilizer in Different Proportions on Nitrogen and Phosphorus Loss and Runoff of Agroforestry Systems[J]. JOURNAL OF YUNNAN AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY（Natural Science）, 2016, 31(2): 335-340. DOI: 10.16211/j.issn.1004-390X(n).2016.02.022
shu

The Influence of Application of Slow-release Fertilizer in Different Proportions on Nitrogen and Phosphorus Loss and Runoff of Agroforestry Systems

  • College of Resource and Environment, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming 650201, China

More Information
  • Received Date: October 27, 2014
  • Revised Date: February 19, 2015
  • Published Date: March 29, 2016
    Graphical Abstract
    • Abstract
  • Applying different proportions of slow-release fertilizer in peach tree/soybean intercropping mode as a processing, the application of slow-release fertilizer in different proportions on sediment loss and runoff, nitrogen and phosphorus losses from peach tree/soybean intercropping mode were studied. The results showed that: in the peach/soybean intercropping model, compared with controls, application of slow-release fertilizer significantly reduced the concentration of nitrogen and phosphorus in runoff, and reduced the amount of sediment in the proportion of loss of nitrogen and phosphorus. In terms of the loss of the process, changes in the performance of the three treatments were expressed as increase in the early, decreased in the mid and late stabilized. Compared with the CK, the amount runoff and loss of treatment Ⅰ and Ⅱ were reduced by 8.15% and 23.60%, sediment loss of treatment Ⅰ and Ⅱ were reduced by 5.25% and 18.55%. So in the peach/soybean intercropping patterns, application of slow-release fertilizer can effectively control the runoff erosion, sediment erosion and loss of nitrogen and phosphorus.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References (18)
  • [1] 吴丰昌,孟伟,宋永会,等. 中国湖泊水环境基准的研究进展[J] .环境科学学报,2008,28(12):2385.
    [2] [2] 全为民,严力蛟. 农业面源污染对水体富营养化的影响及防治措施[J] . 生态学报,2002,22(3) : 291.
    [3] [3] 段然,汤月丰,文炯, 等. 减量施肥对湖垸旱地作物产量及氮磷径流损失的影响[J] . 中国生态农业学报,2013,21(5):536.
    [4] [4] 程文娟,史静. 滇池流域农田土壤氮磷流失分析研究[J] . 水土保持学报,2008,22(5):52.
    [5] [5] LI K, SIMA X F, DING S Q,et al. Effects of controlled release fertilizer on loss of nitrogen and phosphorus from farmland[J].Agricultural Science and Technology,2012,13(8):1727.
    [6] [6] 王艳华,邱现奎, 胡国庆,等. 控释肥对坡地农田地表径流氮磷流失的影响[J]. 水土保持学报,2011,25(2):10.
    [7] [7] NAIR P K R, GARRITY D. Agroforestry research and development: the way forward[J]. Advances in Agroforestry, 2012,9(2):515.
    [8] [8] 国家环境保护总局. 水和废水监测分析方法[M] .4版.北京:中国环境科学出版社, 2002.
    [9] [9] 奚旦立,孙裕生,刘秀英.环境监测[M] .北京:高等教育出版社,2004:31.
    [10] [10] 鲍士旦.土壤农化分析[M]. 2版. 北京:中国农业出版社, 2008: 241.
    [11] [11] 吴希媛,张丽萍,张妙仙, 等. 不同雨强下坡地氮流失特征[J] . 生态学报,2007,27(11):4576.
    [12] [12] 窦培谦,王晓燕,王丽华. 非点源污染中氮磷迁移转化机理研究进展[J]. 首都师范大学学报,2006,27(2):93.
    [13] [13] 王昭艳,左长清,曹文洪,等. 红壤丘陵区次降雨条件下果园不同间套种模式径流与泥沙输移特征[J]. 水土保持学报,2011,25(4):74.
    [14] [14] 杨丽霞,杨桂山,苑韶峰, 等. 影响土壤氮素径流流失的因素探析[J]. 中国生态农业学报,2007,15(6):190.
    [15] [15] 高德才,张蕾,刘强.不同施肥模式对旱地土壤氮素径流流失的影响[J].水土保持学报,2014,28(3):209.
    [16] [16] 袁东海,王兆骞,陈欣,等. 不同农作方式下红壤坡耕地土壤磷素流失特征[J]. 应用生态学报,2003(10):1661.
    [17] [17] 李其林,魏朝富,王显军,等. 农业面源污染发生条件与污染机理[J]. 土壤通报,2008,39(1):169.
    [18] [18] 郑少文,郭智,王子臣,等.太湖流域典型蔬菜地氮素径流流失特征[J].水土保持学报,2014,28(3):204.
    • Related Articles

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(7)

    1. 骆美，李静，高庭峰，Nebiyou Legesse，刘莹，张可欣，赖锡军，马友华，胡宏祥. 不同施肥对稻田氮磷流失的影响及机制分析. 农业环境科学学报. 2025(01): 126-139 .
    2. 龚凯，王连春. 缓释肥在林业中的应用研究进展. 林业科技通讯. 2024(06): 7-12 .
    3. 陈佳钰，李永梅，廖学圆，范茂攀，王自林，赵吉霞. 基施缓释肥等氮替代化肥对径流氮素流失和青贮玉米生长的影响. 水土保持研究. 2023(03): 188-194 .
    4. 陈佳钰，李永梅，廖学圆，范茂攀，王自林，赵吉霞. 缓释肥等氮替代尿素对坡耕地径流氮素流失和青贮玉米生长的影响. 水土保持学报. 2023(04): 38-46 .
    5. 武鹏，王玉凤，杨克军，张翼飞，薛盈文，张鹏飞，陈天宇，庞晨，王怀鹏，尹雪巍，杨丽. 不同氮素形态及配比对土壤养分和酶活性及玉米产量的影响. 中国土壤与肥料. 2018(05): 24-32 .
    6. 张萌，马智黠，徐永康，张荣华，芶久兰，陈龙，周瑞荣，柳玲玲，何佳芳. 贵州春马铃薯生物效应及土壤肥力对不同类型缓释肥的响应. 南方农业学报. 2017(05): 793-799 .
    7. 姚金玲，张克强，郭海刚，王风，张贵龙，任天志. 不同施肥方式下洱海流域水稻-大蒜轮作体系氮磷径流损失研究. 农业环境科学学报. 2017(11): 2287-2296 .

    Other cited types(8)

Catalog

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML
    Article views (1925) PDF downloads (521) Cited by(15)
    Turn off MathJax
    Article Contents
    Abstract
    References
    • Copyright © Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University Editorial Department
    • Address: Room 108, Adult Education Building, Yunnan Agricultural University, No. 95 Heijin Road, Kunming, Yunnan Postal Code: 650201
    • Tel: +86-871-65227711 E-mail: ynauzkxb@foxmail.com

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd.

    Return