• Chinese Science Citation Database (CSCD) Source Journals
  • A Guide to the Core Journals of China
  • Top 100 Sci-Tech Journals of Chinese Universities
  • Chinese Science and Technical Core Journals
  • China Agriculture and Forestry Core Journals (Category A)
LIN Wanshu. Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Index Systems of Cabbage in Gutian Mountain Area[J]. JOURNAL OF YUNNAN AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY(Natural Science), 2015, 30(3): 477-483. DOI: 10.16211/j.issn.1004-390X(n).2015.03.025
Citation: LIN Wanshu. Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Index Systems of Cabbage in Gutian Mountain Area[J]. JOURNAL OF YUNNAN AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY(Natural Science), 2015, 30(3): 477-483. DOI: 10.16211/j.issn.1004-390X(n).2015.03.025

Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Index Systems of Cabbage in Gutian Mountain Area

More Information
  • Received Date: October 23, 2014
  • Revised Date: January 05, 2015
  • Published Date: May 15, 2015
  • In order to understand the application effects of nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P) and potassium (K) on cabbage in Gutian mountain area and establish cabbage soil fertility indicators, nine groups of cabbage3414fertilizer experiment were conducted. The results showed that: Under the existing soil fertility levels, applying N, P and K fertilizers was the major measure to improve the yield of Chinese cabbage and increase the economic benefit in Gutian. Applying N, P and K fertilizers increased the average yields by 37.1%, 11.5% and 17.4%, respectively; Applying 1 kg N, P and K fertilizers increased the economic benefit by 186.6, 145.2, 109.4 Yuan. The input-output ratios of N, P2O5, K2O were 35.9:1, 26.9:1 and 20.3:1, respectively. The cabbage low soil fertility levels of N, P and K nutrient contents were critical index 131.4 mg/kg, 8.9 mg/kg and 59.9 mg/kg and the high fertility levels of the soil N, P and K nutrient contents were 189.9 mg/kg, 43.4 mg/kg and 159.4 mg/kg. The highest average yields with applying N, P and K fertilizers were (231.01 69.95), (56.59 34.09), (198.7 40.63) kg/hm2; The optimum economic yields were (222.13 64.28), (52.69 30.97), (188.55 33.27) kg/hm2. The study provides a scientific basis for local cabbage soil fertilization.
  • [1] 黄徳明.十年来我国测土施肥的进展[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2003,9(4):495-499.
    [2] [2] 陆允甫,吕晓男.中国测土测土施肥工作的进展和展望[J].土壤学报,1995,32(3):241-251.
    [3] [3] 农业部种植业管理司.测土配方施肥管理与技术培训教材[S].
    [4] [4] 陈新平,张福锁.通过3414试验建立测土配方施肥技术指标体系[J].中国农技推广,2006(4):37-39.
    [5] [5] 王圣瑞,陈新平,高祥照,等.34140 肥料试验模型拟合的探讨[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2002,8(4): 409-413.
    [6] [6] 鲁如坤.土壤农业化学分析方法[M].北京:中国农业科技出版社,2000.
    [7] [7] 沈善敏.中国土壤肥力[M].北京:中国农业出版社,1998:351.
    [8] [8] 土壤养分丰缺指标.中国农业仪器网[EB/OL].2009-08-26.
    [9] [9] 章明清,徐志平,姚宝全,等.Monte Carlo法在多元肥效模型参数估计和推荐施肥中的应用[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2009,15(2):366-373.
    [10] [10] 章明清,林代炎,林仁埙,等.极值判别分析在三元肥效模型推荐施肥中的作用[J].福建农业学报,1995,10(2):54-59.
    [11] [11] 李娟,章明清,姚宝全,等.福建省主要蔬菜氮磷钾营养特性及其施肥指标体系研究[J].福建农业报,2011,26(3):332-439.
    [12] [12] 戴树荣,洪彩.南安市花生氮磷钾推荐施肥指标研究[J].福建农业学报,2010,25(4):422-427.
    [13] [13] 戴树荣.南安县域甘薯的土壤养分丰缺指标研究[J].中国土壤与肥料,2010,(3):11-16.
    [14] [14] 王兴仁,陈新平,张福锁,等.施肥模型在我国推荐施肥中的应用[J].植物营养与肥料学报,1998, 4(1):67-74.
    [15] [15] 章明清,林代炎,林仁埙.福建水稻区域施肥模型及其推荐施肥研究[J].福建省农科院学报, 1996,12(1):51-55.
    [16] [16] 侯彦林,陈守伦.施肥模型研究综述[J].土壤通报,2004,35(4):493-501.
    [17] [17] 姚宝全,徐志平,章明清,等.福建主要粮油作物测土配方施肥指标体系研究.区域施肥模型及其推荐施肥[J].福建农业学报,2009,24(2):137-142.
    [18] [18] 张福锁.测土配方施肥技术要鉴[M].北京:中国农业大学出版社, 2006:93-111.
    [19] [19] 刘顺国,刑岩,韩晓日.辽宁省水稻土壤养分丰缺指标建立初探[J].土壤通报,2008,39(4):871-873.
    [20] [20] 杨守春,陈伦寿.黄淮海平原主要作物优化施肥和土壤培肥技术[M].北京:中国农业科技出版社,1991:1-26.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(1)

    1. 王贻莲,黄鼎立,魏艳丽,李红梅,杨合同,李纪顺. 土壤调理剂和木霉LTR-2联合施用对小油菜连作障碍土壤的修复. 山东科学. 2022(06): 74-79+91 .

    Other cited types(0)

Catalog

    Article views (1902) PDF downloads (316) Cited by(1)