Citation: | CHEN Ping, CHEN Peng, LAN Pingxiu, et al. Evaluation of the Control Effect of Different Neoseiulus barkeri Application Ways on Frankliniella occidentalis in Tobacco Field[J]. JOURNAL OF YUNNAN AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY(Natural Science), 2023, 38(5): 764-770. DOI: 10.12101/j.issn.1004-390X(n).202301002 |
To explore the predatory mite release way with the best control effect on Frankliniella occidentalis through spraying Neoseiulus barkeri on tobacco plants and/or weeds with different times in the field.
N. barkeri was sprayed one to three times with 15-day intervals, respectively, during tobacco growing season in the field. Three N. barkeri release ways including application N. barkeri on both tobacco and weeds, only on tobacco or weeds were set respectively under each release time. The control effect of N. barkeri on F. occidentalis on tobacco field was evaluated by comparing the population of F. occidentalis under different releasing times and methods.
The application of N. barkeri on tobacco and weeds for three times had the best control effect on the population of F. occidentalis, and the maintenance time was the longest, with the highest relative control effect of 58.02%. The control effect of twice application of the N. barkeri was the second, and the highest relative control effect was 55.57%. While the control effect on F. occidentalis was the worst after only one application of N. barkeri, and the highest relative control effect was only 49.96% and the duration of the control effect was the shortest. At the same application time, the control effect of N. barkeri applied only to tobacco plant was slightly higher than that only to the weeds, but there was no significant difference between them.
The simultaneous release of N. barkeri on tobacco and weeds in tobacco fields can better control F. occidentalis, and the release of N. barkeri on tobacco and weeds at least twice during the tobacco field period (the interval is about 15 days) can achieve relatively good control effect. When the cost is allowed, the more the number of releases of N. barkeri, the better the prevention and control effect on thrips such as F. occidentalis.
[1] |
郑雪, 陈永对, 吴阔, 等. 2014年云南番茄、辣椒上番茄斑萎病毒属病毒与传毒蓟马的发生特点[J]. 南方农业学报, 2015, 46(3): 429. DOI: 10.3969/j:issn.2095-1191.2015.3.428.
|
[2] |
KUO Y W, GILBERTSON R L, TURINI T, et al. Characterization and epidemiology of outbreaks of Impatiens necrotic spot virus on lettuce in coastal California[J]. Plant Disease, 2014, 98(8): 241. DOI: 10.1094/PDIS-07-13-0681-RE.
|
[3] |
ZHAO M F, HO H H, WU Y X, et al. Western flower thrips (Frankliniella occidentalis) transmits Maize chlorotic mottle virus[J]. Journal of Phytopathology, 2014, 162(7/8): 532. DOI: 10.1111/jph.12217.
|
[4] |
高雪, 王偲博, 李正洋, 等. 云南省烟草正番茄斑萎病毒属病毒的调查和鉴定[J]. 中国烟草学报, 2020, 26(1): 85. DOI: 10.16472/j.chinatobacco.2019.164.
|
[5] |
谢永辉, 张留臣, 王志江, 等. 烤烟不同生长期蓟马种类和发生规律分析[J]. 烟草科技, 2019, 52(11): 24. DOI: 10.16135/j.issn1002-0861.2018.0516.
|
[6] |
段艳茹, 杨军章, 游堂贵, 等. 昭通烟区番茄斑萎病毒病流行与西花蓟马数量关系研究[J]. 云南农业大学学报(自然科学), 2020, 35(6): 2. DOI: 10.12101/j.issn.1004-390X(n).202002010.
|
[7] |
韩云, 唐良德, 吴建辉. 蓟马类害虫综合治理研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2015, 31(22): 165. DOI: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb15030049.
|
[8] |
盛福敬, 王恩东, 徐学农, 等. 以甜果螨为食的东方钝绥螨的种群生命表[J]. 中国生物防治学报, 2014, 30(2): 195. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-039X.2014.02.009.
|
[9] |
江高飞, 陈飞, 李晓娇, 等. 巴氏新小绥螨的研究进展[J]. 中国南方果树, 2012, 41(2): 37. DOI: 10.13938/j.issn.1007-1431.2012.02.008.
|
[10] |
尚素琴, 刘平, 陈耀年, 等. 巴氏新小绥螨对二斑叶螨的捕食功能及控制潜力研究[J]. 植物保护, 2017, 43(3): 119. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0529-1542.2017.03.020.
|
[11] |
刘俊清, 方小端, 刘庆岩, 等. 巴彦淖尔市野生枸杞地植绥螨种类记述[J]. 山西农业科学, 2019, 47(2): 257. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2481.2019.02.26.
|
[12] |
朱睿, 郭建军, 乙天慈, 等. 加州新小绥螨对侧多食跗线螨的捕食潜能[J]. 植物保护学报, 2019, 46(2): 466. DOI: 10.13802/j.cnki.zwbhxb.2019.2018008.
|
[13] |
程峻峰, 万方浩, 郭建英, 等. 外来有害入侵生物: 西花蓟马[J]. 中国生物防治学报, 2005(2): 75. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1005-9261.2005.02.003.
|
[14] |
韦日机, 张征, 梁才茂, 等. 胡瓜钝绥螨对柑桔红蜘蛛的控制作用[J]. 中国生物防治, 2007, 23(S1): 8. DOI: 10.16409/j.cnki.2095-039x.2007.s1.002.
|
[15] |
张艳璇, 林坚贞, 季洁. 工厂化生产胡瓜钝绥螨防治柑橘全爪螨的应用效果[J]. 中国植保导刊, 2002, 22(10): 25. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-6820.2002.10.010.
|
[16] |
余德亿, 张艳璇, 唐建阳, 等. 捕食螨在我国农林害螨生物防治中的应用[J]. 昆虫知识, 2008, 45(4): 537. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0452-8255.2008.04.007.
|
[17] |
周炀. 巴氏新小绥螨对芒果茶黄蓟马的控制作用及适应性评价[D]. 海口: 海南大学, 2020.
|
[18] |
钟锋, 吕利华, 高燕, 等. 西花蓟马的危害及生物防治研究进展[J]. 广东农业科学, 2009(8): 120. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-874X.2009.08.039.
|
[19] |
HOY C W, GLENISTER C S. Releasing Amblyseius spp. (Acarina: Phytoseiidae) to control Thrips tabaci (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) on cabbage[J]. Entomophaga, 1991, 36(4): 561. DOI: 10.1007/BF02374439.
|
[20] |
宣丽霞, 胡敏, 王丽梅. 不同密度捕食螨对日光温室茄子红蜘蛛防控效果[J]. 农业科技与信息, 2020(23): 32. DOI: 10.15979/j.cnki.cn62-1057/s.2020.23.011.
|
[21] |
刘平. 巴氏新小绥螨的捕食功能反应及保护利用[D]. 兰州: 甘肃农业大学, 2014.
|
[22] |
LI W Z, LI H L, GUO Z K, et al. Effects of short-term heat stress on the development and reproduction of predatory mite Neoseiulus barkeri (Acari, Phytoseiidae)[J]. Systematic and Applied Acarology, 2021, 26(4): 713. DOI: 10.11158/saa.26.4.5.
|
[23] |
吴千红, 邵则信, 苏德明. 昆虫生态学实验[M]. 上海: 复旦大学出版社, 1991.
|
[24] |
潘义宏, 穆青, 蒋水萍, 等. 综合防治措施对西花蓟马和烤烟番茄斑萎病的防治效果[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2018, 46(22): 96. DOI: 10.15889/j.issn.1002-1302.2018.22.021.
|
[25] |
陈德西, 何忠全, 郭云建, 等. 蓟马在韭菜上的发生规律和防治[J]. 中国农学通报, 2018, 34(15): 145. DOI: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb17040040.
|
[26] |
曲明静, 刘爱娜, 曾庆朝, 等. 气象因子对青岛市花生田西花蓟马种群数量的影响[J]. 花生学报, 2019, 48(4): 43. DOI: 10.14001/j.issn.1002-4093.2019.04.007.
|