• Chinese Science Citation Database (CSCD) Source Journals
  • A Guide to the Core Journals of China
  • Top 100 Sci-Tech Journals of Chinese Universities
  • Chinese Science and Technical Core Journals
  • China Agriculture and Forestry Core Journals (Category A)
Shaowu YANG, Yang FU, Xingxing LI, et al. Arthropod Community Structure and Its Stability in Perennial Rice Field[J]. JOURNAL OF YUNNAN AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY(Natural Science), 2021, 36(5): 775-782. DOI: 10.12101/j.issn.1004-390X(n).202009022
Citation: Shaowu YANG, Yang FU, Xingxing LI, et al. Arthropod Community Structure and Its Stability in Perennial Rice Field[J]. JOURNAL OF YUNNAN AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY(Natural Science), 2021, 36(5): 775-782. DOI: 10.12101/j.issn.1004-390X(n).202009022

Arthropod Community Structure and Its Stability in Perennial Rice Field

More Information
  • Received Date: September 19, 2020
  • Revised Date: April 04, 2021
  • Available Online: September 01, 2021
  • Published Date: September 29, 2021
  • PurposeTo clarify the composition of arthropod community in perennial rice field, analyze its community characteristics and stability, and provide scientific basis for integrated pest management in perennial rice planting.
    MethodThe five points sampling method, incorporating sweep sampling, plate beating, visual inspection and trapping were used to record the number of arthropod in perennial and conventional rice fields, and the community characteristics of arthropods in perennial rice field were analyzed by using community characteristic index and principal component analysis.
    ResultThere were 17 species of pest and 20 species of enemy in the first season of perennial rice, and there were 15 species of pest and 27 species of enemy in the second season. The individual number of pests in perennial rice field was higher than that of conventional rice in the same year, and the individual number of pests in the second season of perennial rice field was higher than that of the first season. The diversity index and evenness index of arthropod community in the second season of perennial rice field were slightly lower than those in the first season, and the dominance index and dominance concentration index were higher than those in the first season. The values of Ss/Si, Sp/Sb and Sa/Sb of arthropod community in the second season of perennial rice field were significantly lower than those in the first season and conventional rice field (P<0.05), while the values of Sn/Sp and Sn/Sa were significantly higher than those in the first season and conventional rice field (P<0.05). With the increase of planting season, the most important factors for the change of arthropod community in perennial rice field changed from the comprehensive factors of species number of sucking pests and individual number of leaf roller pests, borer pests and predatory enemies in the first season to comprehensive factors of the species number and individual number of sucking pests and leaf roller pests and species number of leaf-feeding pests and predatory enemies in the second season.
    ConclusionThe number of pests in the second season of perennial rice was higher, and the stability of arthropod community was lower than that in the first season. With the increase of planting season of perennial rice, the sucking pests, leaf roller pests and borer pests should be focused on prevention and control to ensure the safe production of perennial rice.
  • [1]
    冯建孟, 何汉明, 朱有勇, 等. 云南地区稻作品种多样性的地理分布格局及其与自然环境和民族文化的关系[J]. 云南农业大学学报(自然科学), 2010, 25(4): 451. DOI: 10.16211/j.issn.1004-390x(n).2010.04.006.
    [2]
    YANG J, QIU H G, HUANG J K, et al. Fighting global food price rises in the developing world: the response of China and its effect on domestic and world markets[J]. Agricultural Economics, 2008, 39(S1): 453. DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-0862.2008.00351.x.
    [3]
    段永华, 张钟, 郭春平, 等. 云南省水稻生产的区域比较优势分析[J]. 农业开发与装备, 2015(4): 22. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-9205.2015.04.021.
    [4]
    杨继荣. 云南地区水稻种植发展现状及制约因素分析[J]. 中国农资, 2014(8): 38.
    [5]
    云南省统计局. 云南统计年鉴[M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2019.
    [6]
    方福平, 程式华. 论中国水稻生产能力[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2009, 23(6): 559. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7216.2009.06.01.
    [7]
    吴碧球, 黄所生, 黄凤宽. 环境因素对水稻品种抗褐飞虱的影响研究概况[J]. 植物保护, 2015, 41(1): 1. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0529-1542.2015.01.001.
    [8]
    汪浩, 张强, 张文地, 等. 腋芽萌发能力对再生稻产量影响的研究进展[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2020, 34(3): 205. DOI: 10.16819/j.1001-7216.2020.9097.
    [9]
    CRISPIN G D, LISINGER J A, 施牛, 等. 再生稻中害虫与天敌的虫口密度[J]. 云南农业科技, 1987(4): 38.
    [10]
    罗克昌, 江天富, 李云平. 再生稻稻瘿蚊发生动态及对产量的影响[J]. 生物安全学报, 2001, 10(2): 108.
    [11]
    蔡志刚. 水稻再生稻高产栽培技术探讨[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2006, 34(1): 75. DOI: 10.13989/j.cnki.0517-6611.2006.01.041.
    [12]
    赵士熙, 王良威, 尤民生, 等. 再生稻田节肢动物群落的研究[J]. 福建农林大学学报, 1995, 24(3): 295. DOI: 10.13323/j.cnki.J.fafu(nat.sci.)1995.03.010.
    [13]
    HUANG G F, QIN S W, ZHANG S L, et al. Performance, economics and potential impact of perennial rice PR23 relative to annual rice cultivars at multiple locations in Yunnan Province of China[J]. Sustainability, 2018, 10(4): 1086. DOI: 10. 3390/su10041086.
    [14]
    羊绍武, 张晓明, 郭海业, 等. 多年生水稻田主要害虫、天敌消长规律及时间生态位分析[J]. 应用昆虫学报, 2019, 56(6): 1370. DOI: 10.7679/j.issn.2095-1353.2019.150.
    [15]
    LU Z X, ZHU P Y, GURR G M, et al. Rice pest management by ecological engineering: a pioneering attempt in China[M]//HEONG K, CHENG J, ESCALADA M. Rice planthoppers. Netherlands: Springer, 2015.
    [16]
    GURR G M, LU Z X, ZHENG X S, et al. Multi-country evidence that crop diversification promotes ecological intensification of agriculture[J]. Nature Plants, 2016, 2(3): 16014. DOI: 10.1038/NPLANTS. 2016.14.
    [17]
    张晓明, 李强, 陈国华, 等. 不同种植模式花椒园昆虫群落的结构及稳定性[J]. 应用生态学报, 2009, 20(8): 1986. DOI: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.2009.0271.
    [18]
    范俊珺, 梁兴格, 陆玉, 等. 文山州稻纵卷叶螟监测预警与综合防控技术[J]. 云南农业科技, 2019(5): 20.
    [19]
    郑庆伟. 2019年云南省农作物主要病虫害发生趋势[J]. 农药市场信息, 2019(4): 55. DOI: 10.13378/j.cnki.pmn.2019.04.046.
    [20]
    杨东海. 文山市农作物病虫害监测预报工作现状与对策分析[J]. 南方农业, 2018, 12(35): 97. DOI: 10.19415/j.cnki.1673-890x.2018.35.051.
    [21]
    翟清明, 林琳, 张雪萍, 等. 乙草胺对农田中小型土壤动物群落结构的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2014, 22(4): 456. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1011.2014.31109.
    [22]
    桂芳艳, 刘雨芳, 莫书银, 等. 转Cry1Ab/Ac基因水稻对稻田底栖动物群落的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2015, 23(9): 1178. DOI: 10.13930/j.cnki.cjea.150375.
    [23]
    马晓慧, 车喜庆, 王井士, 等. 稻蟹共作与常规稻田蜘蛛群落组成及多样性分析[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2019, 27(8): 1157. DOI: 10.13930/j.cnki.cjea.181068.
    [24]
    李琼, 李强, 张晓明. 大豆/玉米间作密度对大豆田节肢动物群落多样性和稳定性的影响[J]. 南方农业学报, 2019, 50(6): 1247. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1191.2019.06.13.
    [25]
    强承魁, 杜予州, 于玲雅, 等. 水稻二化螟越冬幼虫耐寒性物质的动态变化[J]. 应用生态学报, 2008, 19(3): 599. DOI: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.2008.0132.
    [26]
    吕亮, 常向前, 杨小林, 等. 湖北水稻蛀秆螟虫越冬情况调查[J]. 环境昆虫学报, 2018, 40(5): 1051. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-0858.2018.05.12.
    [27]
    韦丽莉, 林兴华, 李文芳, 等. 滇西南稻区稻飞虱越冬情况调查[J]. 中国植保导刊, 2020, 40(4): 39.
    [28]
    羊绍武, 张晓明, 郭海业, 等. 多年生水稻田主要害虫种类及种群动态[J]. 云南农业大学学报(自然科学), 2019, 34(1): 1. DOI: 10.12101/j.issn.1004-390X(n).201712033.
    [29]
    田国强, 陈宇宏, 任彦鸿, 等. 基于主成分分析的梨园节肢动物群落动态研究[J]. 山西农业科学, 2020, 48(5): 799. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2481.2020.05.31.
    [30]
    柴正群, 可胜杰, 黄吉, 等. 不同种植环境夏玉米田节肢动物群落特征及稳定性[J]. 生态学杂志, 2016, 35(12): 3306. DOI: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.201612.002.
    [31]
    陈璨, 阮先乐, 常云霞, 等. 多年生粮食作物研究现状[J]. 生物学教学, 2012, 37(8): 2. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-7549.2012.08.001.
    [32]
    GLOVER J D, REGANOLD J P, BELL L W, et al. Increased food and ecosystem security via perennial grains[J]. Science, 2010, 328(5986): 1638. DOI: 10.1126/science.1188761.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(8)

    1. 许见辉,刘佰明,白义川,王芳,何亮,谷希树,张李香,杨泽众. 天津武清区稻田节肢动物群落多样性. 环境昆虫学报. 2024(02): 449-458 .
    2. 蒲雷,蔡万伦,华红霞,沈栎阳,朱宏远,李绍勤. 江汉平原稻田主要害虫与天敌关系分析. 昆虫学报. 2024(04): 582-588 .
    3. 李宏,马小洁,杨林林,杜广祖,陈斌,李皎. 释放烟蚜茧蜂防治烟田烟蚜的生态效应评估技术. 云南农业大学学报(自然科学). 2024(03): 46-55 .
    4. 农正国,段沛希,刘霞. 杂交水稻与传统水稻田间昆虫及天敌动物群落比较. 现代农业科技. 2024(23): 95-98 .
    5. 何艳艳,龙晓明,杨虎权,孙淦琳,雷金佳,杜广祖,陈斌. 思茅松林下重楼和白及田节肢动物群落组成结构及多样性研究. 环境昆虫学报. 2024(06): 1434-1444 .
    6. 亢菊侠,王壮,仲颜怡. 不同品种设施草莓园节肢动物种群动态监测及群落特征分析. 陕西农业科学. 2023(08): 68-72 .
    7. 谢子菲,徐路宸,黄国嫣,李云国,龚占斌,肖春,郭子俊. 不同品种苹果园昆虫群落多样性及主要害虫发生动态分析. 植物检疫. 2023(05): 47-54 .
    8. 王承勋,许雅娟,曾新德,贾斌斌,潘茜,陆云,许燕,霍建华. 石羊河下游矮脚锦鸡儿群落特征研究. 安徽农业科学. 2023(22): 112-114 .

    Other cited types(4)

Catalog

    Article views (3542) PDF downloads (24) Cited by(12)