• Chinese Science Citation Database (CSCD) Source Journals
  • A Guide to the Core Journals of China
  • Top 100 Sci-Tech Journals of Chinese Universities
  • Chinese Science and Technical Core Journals
  • China Agriculture and Forestry Core Journals (Category A)
Jun LIU, Hongyi WANG, Longjun PENG, et al. The Characteristics of Tobacco Thickness in Hubei Province[J]. JOURNAL OF YUNNAN AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY(Natural Science), 2020, 35(3): 541-545. DOI: 10.12101/j.issn.1004-390X(n).201906011
Citation: Jun LIU, Hongyi WANG, Longjun PENG, et al. The Characteristics of Tobacco Thickness in Hubei Province[J]. JOURNAL OF YUNNAN AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY(Natural Science), 2020, 35(3): 541-545. DOI: 10.12101/j.issn.1004-390X(n).201906011

The Characteristics of Tobacco Thickness in Hubei Province

More Information
  • Received Date: June 11, 2019
  • Revised Date: April 05, 2020
  • Available Online: June 22, 2020
  • Published Date: April 30, 2020
  • PurposeDetermining the characteristics of thickness of flue-cured tobacco leaves in Hubei Province in order to provide a better guidance for classification measurements.
    MethodTotal 600 pieces of flue-cured tobacco leaves examined in five physiological parts utilized a multi-point drilling technique to determine thickness and “body difference”.
    Result(1) The order of thickness of tobacco leaves was: parietal>upper two-shed>cutters>lower two-shed>bottom. Leaf block thickness gradually increased from base to medium, and gradually thinned after reaching optimal thickness value. (2) Characteristics of tobacco leaf thickness: bottom leaves were “thin and even”. Lower two-shed leaves were “slightly thinner than an entire leaf, thin base and thick upper”. Cutters were “moderate thickness, thin base, thick and even from medium up”. Upper two-shed leaves were “slightly thicker than an entire leaf, base tip with minor differences, thick and even from medium up”, and the parietal leaves were “thick and even”. (3) “Body difference” of tobacco leaves suggested that observations could be taken from the middle towards base portion of the bottom leaves, the lower two sheds, cutters and the upper two sheds from the tip, the parietal leaves from the medium up towards tip, these measurements enable an accurate sensory judgement of the “body grade” of tobacco leaves.
    ConclusionUnderstanding the characteristics of thickness in variable positions and block portions of the tobacco leaves provides a rapid way for classification.
  • [1]
    国家技术监督局. 中国标准文献分类法[M]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 1989.
    [2]
    魏春阳, 薛超群, 金立锋, 等. 县级区域尺度下烤烟烟叶厚度的区域特征[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2010, 31(4): 52. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-5119.2010.04.011.
    [3]
    张鑫, 付秋娟, 窦家宇, 等. 主要产区烟叶厚度分析研究[J]. 中国烟草学报, 2014, 20(3): 42. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-5708.2014.03.007.
    [4]
    王浩雅, 王理珉, 张强, 等. 烟叶单层厚度与层积厚度测定方法的对比分析[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2011, 39(16): 9585. DOI: 10.13989/j.cnki.0517-6611.2011.16.198.
    [5]
    胡巍耀, 凌军, 杨盼盼, 等. CARS特征变量优选近红外光谱法测定初烤烟烟叶厚度[J]. 云南农业大学学报 (自然科学), 2017, 32(2): 288. DOI: 10.16211/j.issn.1004-390x(n).2017.02.014.
    [6]
    李玉菲, 慕小倩, 张立新, 等. 不同叶位烟叶厚度差异的解剖学分析[J]. 西南农业学报, 2017, 30(9): 2124. DOI: 10.16213/j.cnki.scjas.2017.9.034.
    [7]
    王能如, 李章海, 徐增汉, 等. 烘烤过程中上部叶片厚度及解剖结构的变化[J]. 烟草科技, 2005, 38(9): 29. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0861.2005.09.010.
    [8]
    烟叶分级工专业知识编写组. 烟叶分级工专业知识[M]. 北京: 北京出版集团公司北京出版社, 2013.
    [9]
    李晓, 刘文锋, 张碰元. 河南烤烟烟叶叶片厚度的研究[J]. 农产品加工·学刊, 16.
    [10]
    OTTOLINE L, STEPHE D. 植物发育的机制[M]. 瞿礼嘉, 邓兴旺, 译. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2006.
    [11]
    吴国贺, 李虎林, 孙立娟, 等. 烤烟不同成熟度叶片组织结构与色素含量的变化[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2007, 35(32): 10311. DOI: 10.13989/j.cnki.0517-6611.2007.32.033.
    [12]
    李跃武, 陈朝阳, 江豪, 等. 烤烟品种云烟85烟叶的成熟度I. 成熟度与叶片组织结构、叶色、化学成分的关系[J]. 福建农林大学学报 (自然科学版), 2002, 31(1): 16. DOI: 10.13323/j.cnki.j.fafu(nat.sci.).2002.01.004.
    [13]
    陈建国, 杨扬, 孙航. 高山植物对全球气候变暖的响应研究进展[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2011, 17(3): 435.
    [14]
    施爱萍, 张金政, 张启翔, 等. 不同遮荫水平下4个玉簪品种的生长性状分析[J]. 植物研究, 2004, 24(4): 486. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5102.2004.04.030.
    [15]
    潘红丽, 李迈和, 蔡小虎, 等. 海拔梯度上的植物生长与生理生态特性[J]. 生态环境学报, 2009, 18(2): 722. DOI: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2009.02.036.

Catalog

    Article views (2153) PDF downloads (6) Cited by()