陈松林, 余雨, 赵勇. “五治融合”乡村治理体系下新乡贤参与困境与对策研究——以芜湖市D村为例[J]. 云南农业大学学报(社会科学), 2024, 18(2): 88−95. doi: 10.12371/j.ynau(s).202310091
引用本文: 陈松林, 余雨, 赵勇. “五治融合”乡村治理体系下新乡贤参与困境与对策研究——以芜湖市D村为例[J]. 云南农业大学学报(社会科学), 2024, 18(2): 88−95. doi: 10.12371/j.ynau(s).202310091
CHEN Songlin, YU Yu, ZHAO Yong. Research on the Dilemma and Countermeasures of New Villagers’ Participation under the Rural GovernanceSystem of “Five Governance Integration” :Taking D Village in Wuhu City as An Example[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Social Science), 2024, 18(2): 88-95. DOI: 10.12371/j.ynau(s).202310091
Citation: CHEN Songlin, YU Yu, ZHAO Yong. Research on the Dilemma and Countermeasures of New Villagers’ Participation under the Rural GovernanceSystem of “Five Governance Integration” :Taking D Village in Wuhu City as An Example[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Social Science), 2024, 18(2): 88-95. DOI: 10.12371/j.ynau(s).202310091

“五治融合”乡村治理体系下新乡贤参与困境与对策研究以芜湖市D村为例

Research on the Dilemma and Countermeasures of New Villagers’ Participation under the Rural GovernanceSystem of “Five Governance Integration” :Taking D Village in Wuhu City as An Example

  • 摘要: 在乡村治理实践中,新乡贤由于其独特的优势而广受关注,成为“五治融合”治理体系建设的关键力量。通过对芜湖市D村的调研,发现新乡贤通过宣传政治思想、协助党务村务和参与党组织领办合作社,参与政治;通过调解民间纠纷和禁赌禁毒,参与法治;通过道德评议会和红白理事会,参与德治;通过“三能共建机制”,参与自治;通过引进智慧化生产技术,参与智治。参与困境是激励措施不健全导致参与主体固化、参与制度不健全导致参与行为失范、参与能力不足导致参与领域受限。摆脱困境的对策是“三化措施”激励新乡贤参与治村,“三项标准”完善新乡贤治村制度,“三个强化”提高新乡贤参与能力。

     

    Abstract: In the practice of rural governance, new rural sages have attracted wide attention due to their unique advantages, and have become the key force in the construction of the “five governance integration” governance system. Through the investigation of D village in Wuhu City, it was found that new rural sages participated in politics by publicizing political thoughts, assisting party affairs and village affairs, and participating in party organizations to lead cooperatives. Participated in the rule of law by mediating civil disputes and banning gambling and drugs; through the moral council and the red and white council, participated in the rule of virtue ; participated in autonomy through the “three-energy co-construction mechanism” ; participated in intelligent governance by introducing intelligent production technology. The participation dilemma is that the imperfect incentive measures lead to the solidification of the participants, the imperfect participation system leads to the anomie of participation behavior, and the lack of participation ability leads to the limitation of participation field. The countermeasures to get rid of the dilemma are “three measures” to encourage new rural sages to participate in village governance, “three standards” to improve the system of new rural sages village governance, and “three strengthening” to improve the ability of new rural sages to participate.

     

/

返回文章
返回